Ewok85 said:
Japanese history is longer than that of say Australia (hah) or America and although it cant boast to be as good as some parts of Europe it has a long and diverse history.
This is not true. Both Australia and the US's history start in Europe. Both countries were founded mainly by the UK and are integral part of the UK's history until their independance. Japan's history (by definition, time from which we have written documents) only starts in the 6th century AD, after the fall of the Roman Empire (or the end of the European Antiquity).
Don't you learn about ancient Greece and Rome, or about the Renaissance or European colonisation in Australia (and the US, for American readers) ? Yes, you do, but you don't necessarily learn about Asian or African history. That proves my point.
jieshi said:
I disagree that japanese culture is boring. Would we all be on these forums actively investigating japanese culture, traditonal and pop if it was boring?
BeNippon was referring to culture in the purest sense of the word, which means the arts, classical music, theatre, literature, etc. That does not include pop culture, but the more traditional aspects. In Japan's case, noh, kabuki, ukiyoe, haiku, shamisen,
tea ceremony, etc. - which most people would find boring in comparison to what Europe did in these centuries (from great cathedrals and renaissance paintings to romantic chateaux or classical music, without forgetting literature like Shakespeare, Dante or Voltaire, or even Dickens, Dumas or Hugo).
jieshi said:
well you have the whole story of the last samurai (not the tom cruise movie) but the real last samurai, Saigo Takamori (read a very interesting book on it). The Meji and Heian periods ( oh and tokugawa). There is very interesting stories from all of these. These are just some examples.
This is history, not culture properly speaking. Japan's history, especially the
Meiji era to which Saigo Takamori belongs, is the most interesting part of the "Old Japan". I have written a few articles about important Meiji characters in
JREF's Glossary. But please don't confuse culture and history. At best we could say that a branch of history studies the traditional culture of a country (like Arts History), but not the other way round. In other words, a country's culture is part of its history, but its history is not part of its culture.
I'd say that Japan's history has some interesting periods, and more boring ones (or interesting but very limited in content), while Japanese traditional culture is mostly boring (ukiyoe are the only thing I can really appreciate). This is just my personal perception.