Last night my flat mate told me he used babelfish on the Japanese wikipedia page on the guy and it spat out that he was a fascist.
US, English wiki claims he is an anarchist.
How does that happen?
Fascists and anarchists are like polar opposites.
The first, the state is all, everything. Anarchists on the other hand, tend to oppose the state as "illegitimate authority".
I don't agree with everything anyone who calls themselves an "anarchist" says or does. But they are an interesting lot. And usually overlooked by official history books despite often contributing greatly to a better world (looking back with historical hindsight).
History shows anarchists are often condemned merely because of their political beliefs. Stateside, Emma Goldman and Sacco & Venzetti come to mind.
I'll have to look into the sedition crime.
wikipedia
Sedition is a term of law which refers to covert conduct, such as speech and organization, that is deemed by the legal authority as tending toward insurrection against the established order.
So for example, is a conviction of sedition for having written or spoken the opinion that "the existence of the state or government is a bad thing" ?
Some governments (and I'm not saying Japan does this) consider merely "opposing its existence" to be seditious. Which, if these governments claim to be protecting freedom, which includes freedom of thought & opinion, is quite the opposite.