This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Crime Iwao Hakamada cleared of murders after 46 years on death row

thomas

Unswerving cyclist
Admin
Joined
14 Mar 2002
Messages
21,057
Reaction score
18,914
The Shizuoka District Court on Thursday found former death row inmate Iwao Hakamada innocent of multiple murders, overturning a conviction based on fabricated evidence that kept him imprisoned for nearly five decades. The court agreed with the defence's arguments and evidence presented in the retrial, concluding that Hakamada, now 88, did not kill four family members in 1966. Absent from the courtroom, Hakamada has been fighting for his freedom since his arrest 58 years ago.


Due to mental illnesses developed during his decades behind bars, the court exempted him from testifying in the retrial hearings. In declaring Hakamada's innocence, Presiding Judge Kunii Koshi determined that three pieces of evidence were fabricated by investigative authorities to secure a conviction. One such fabrication was the prosecution's claim that Hakamada had confessed to the crimes. The judge stated that the confession was obtained through inhumane interrogation tactics, violating the suspect's right to remain silent.






 
Asahi has a special feature on the case, with a general overview of the murders in 1966 and Hakamada's arrest, the legal proceedings, the fabrications of the police and the prosecutors, and the letters he wrote while on death row.



 
I wonder why they let him sit there for so long. Practically speaking they would have never had to address this travesty if they had executed him decades ago.
 
I love it when "justice" I proven wrong.
 
I wonder why they let him sit there for so long. Practically speaking they would have never had to address this travesty if they had executed him decades ago.

Do you mean by executing someone innocent? While often distorted and circumvented, the rule of law still prevails in Japan. The problem is procedural: there were/are no clear rules for law enforcement to share evidence with defence lawyers. They reported that some of these regulations date back to the Meiji period. As seen in the Ghosn case, prosecutors will do everything to save their face and their conviction rate of over 99%. In the case of Mr Hakamada, they went as far as to manipulate evidence. I wonder if prosecutors and police can be held responsible for falsifying evidence.
 
Yes. The most puzzling thing about this whole thing to me is how he managed to get this overturned. Confessions are coerced as a matter common practice. And I'm sure evidence handling if often is dubious as well. Did one of the original investigators become a witness for him?
 

I doubt that many of them are still alive. Legal proceedings started in 1966. It's Mr Hakamada's sister that needs to be credited. She had fought for her brother for decades. She was present when the verdict was read yesterday, as her brother couldn't attend in person.
 
But still, how could the judge have decided the confession was coerced then? It doesn't compute. Maybe there was original video of it...
 


The focus now shifts to whether prosecutors, who again demanded the death penalty in the retrial, will appeal Thursday's ruling. The defence team has urged prosecutors not to challenge an acquittal.

I'd be surprised if they didn't.

The verdict also begs the question of who killed the family in 1966.
 
If found he was framed , here in the US there would probably be a big law suit where they have to pay him millions for false imprisonment. Wonder if he will get anything for all that jail time?
 
If found he was framed , here in the US there would probably be a big law suit where they have to pay him millions for false imprisonment. Wonder if he will get anything for all that jail time?

I am sure he's entitled to compensation, but what's appropriate for wrongfully spending 46 years on death row?
 
A month in Thailand with hot women and all he can drink , all expenses paid , LOL. Be his luck , he'd have a heart attack the first day probably.
 
But still, how could the judge have decided the confession was coerced then? It doesn't compute. Maybe there was original video of it...


More on the evidence taken from the JT comment section:

 
I remember when I was in Fukuoka (71-73) , the police had a horrible reputation. I was told stories about them beating confessions out of people. The owner of the bar where I worked said payoffs to police were common. An acquaintance I knew got picked up with birth control pills (not in their original package) and was arrested for drug procession , LOL. He said by the time the cops got done with him , he would have turned in his mother for crimes so they would give him a break. The 5am raid where they kicked in the door to my apartment and panicked when they learned a "gaijin" owned it , did not do much to make me like them , LOL. If the guy was truly innocent , I really feel bad for him.
 
The Supreme Public Prosecutors' Office on 8 October said it will not appeal the 26 September ruling of the Shizuoka District Court that acquitted Hakamada, 88, in a long-awaited retrial. The decision confirms Hakamada's innocence, ending his 58-year battle to clear his name. The prosecutor's office did criticize the district court's ruling, which acknowledged evidence against Hakamada had been fabricated.

Still, prosecutors were unwilling to accept that "investigative authorities fabricated evidence."



I hope Mr Hakamada will receive compensation in his lifetime and enjoy the rest of his days.
 
I've read the Wikipedia about this case, and there were some pretty obvious holes. I'm surprised he was even convicted at all.
 
The Police Chief of Shizuoka, Tsuda Takayoshi, issued an apology on Monday to Hakamata Iwao, who spent nearly half a century on death row. During a visit to Hakamata's home in Hamamatsu, Chief Tsuda expressed deep remorse for the immeasurable hardship and suffering inflicted upon Hakamata during his decades-long ordeal. This personal apology marks a significant step as it is the first time an official from the police or prosecution has directly addressed the injustice of Hakamata's wrongful conviction. Hakamata was arrested by Shizuoka police in 1966 but released in 2014 after new evidence emerged casting doubt on his guilt. The apology serves as a poignant acknowledgement of the grave errors made by the justice system and a testament to the pursuit of justice, even in the face of such a prolonged injustice.








I wonder if any of the investigating cops and prosecutors (1966-1980 and thereafter) are still alive. These guys faked evidence and should have been prosecuted themselves.
 
Wrongful convictions in capital (& other) cases are so common we have The Innocence Project to try to rectify the wrongs. I wonder if Japan has any similar initiatives.

 
Today, the Shizuoka District Court ruled that Hakamada Iwao should receive compensation of over 217 million yen, or about 1.45 million dollars. The amount is the highest in Japan, according to Hakamada's defence team.


 
Yep that sounds about right.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…