This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

How do you know... ON/KUN and beyond

Okay, my head's swimming and I have work every day until Tuesday, but.

I understood what undrentide said in this post almost completely.

I have yet to read the second topic Elizabeth posted, and the first one was too complicated but I'll skim it over, hopefully it'll sink in.

Then, aardwolf asked:
その女の人は私から花をあげます does not work here again.
あげる means "to give", not "to get".

So I came up with:
1) kara signifies morau
2) so then it would be morau
3) because morau is to recieve

He then asked:
but how would you say
A gave X to B. (person talking is C)
or
B san recieved X from A. (person talking is C)

I read Tori's response,

Which stems off Kira's topic, which I haven't covered, so I'll have to do it again. But I thought the same thing in the first sentence, but I thought only morau could be used in the second sentence.

I just have to re-read everything. Thank you guys for posting responses!

面白い説明してくれてありがとうござします!
You know what's even more astounding, I understood that and I think I also have the hiragana down for that... omoshiroi setsumei shite kurete arigatou gosaimasu. (I'm only typing in romaji because I'm too lazy to get my phone.)
 
Ahhhh...~~the ever deepening mysteries of "kureru" ! I still get a headache from this....Kureru can be a favor/positive benefit given to the speaker of course or between two third parties, the recipient of which is an associate of the speaker, but the above sentence does translate to (In Group someone ha/ga ) GAVE her (the indirect object) flowers today. Which means to be fully grammatical the giver has to either be explicitly named or understand from context to be that significant other, etc. It simply describes the situation from the side of that giver...

"Mite mite! kyou hana wo kureta yo! ureshii!" = (look ! look ! (He) gave me flowers today ! I'm so happy !)
"Mite mite! kyou hana wo moratta! ureshii!" (look look! I got flowers today! I'm so happy!)


Morau can be marked with either particles に or から。And kureru can also be between 2 third parties.

Difference between ageru, kureru and morau...
 
Last edited:
Just my impression

ナ陳ゥ窶堙?陳ゥ窶堙?。ツ債。窶愿コ窶ーテ披?堙ー窶堋ュ窶堙ェ窶堋ス窶堙個。窶堋、窶堙ェ窶堋オ窶堋「ツ〜ツ。
ナ陳ゥ窶堙?陳ゥ窶堙?。ツ債。窶愿コ窶ーテ披?堙ー窶堋ュ窶堙ェ窶堋ス窶堙ヲツ。窶堋、窶堙ェ窶堋オ窶堋「窶堙仰。

In the former she simply reports to me that (He) gave her flowers today, whereas the latter sounds like "(He) gave us flowers." It might be sentence final particles issues, though.
 

Yeah Kureru still really spins my head sometimes. Morau and ageru is more straight forward. The only real definite situation i use kureru in is when asking for a favor from a really good friend

Kara and ni both mark the giver when using morau. I'm told though that kara is more used when your talking about a giver thats not...human? Like for example

私は大学から諸学金をもらいました。
I received a scholarship from the university.
 
Yeah, that can't be helped. It has to be kara with non human indirect objects.

Using kureru with inanimate objects is usual pretty safe as well.
 
Hey guys. So here's the compilation of my material from Genki Ch. 13 + 14. I no doubt got a lot wrong and I ask you once again to help me and make sure that at least the structure is right. I have forgotten a LOT since I haven't done it in a week, I am planning to review Ch 13 and 14 and hopefully the listening comprehensions which I suck at.

---



For this one, I put the Hiragana next to the Kanji because I'm horrible at doing the entire thing, you know what I mean?
ヒ彙窶堋ケ窶堙ゥ 窶堙坂?堙遺?堋ケ窶堙ゥ
窶堙??堋ォ窶堙ゥ
ツ行窶堋ッ窶堙ゥ 窶堋「窶堋ッ窶堙ゥ
ナステ倪?堙ィ窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ 窶堋ゥ窶堙ィ窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ
窶藩??堙ェ窶堙ゥ 窶堋ア窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ
ナ陳ゥ窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ 窶堙昶?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ
窶堙「窶堙溪?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ
ツ寝窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ 窶堙銀?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ
窶佚停?堙??堙ゥ 窶堙懌?堙??堙ゥ
窶ーj窶堋ー窶堙ゥ 窶堋ィ窶堙ヲ窶堋ー窶堙ゥ
窶「テ停?堙溪?堙ゥ 窶堋?窶堙溪?堙ゥ
窶慊ュ窶堋ッ窶堙ゥ 窶堙坂?堋ス窶堙ァ窶堋ッ窶堙ゥ



This was the first time I ever had a -te before a verb. If you recall from Elizabeth's first topic, I had never done it, and while I can understand the concept of it, it's not sinking in. I'm sure I'll get it when I review.

窶堋「窶堋「窶堋ヲツ、ツ辛窶ーテ溪?堋ャ窶堙?食窶堙冷?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙ア窶堙??堋オ窶堋スツ。
窶堋「窶堋「窶堋ヲツ、窶愿ッ窶堋オ窶ーテ溪?堋ャ窶堙??堙??堋ォ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙ア窶堙??堋オ窶堋スツ。
窶堋「窶堋「窶堋ヲツ、窶扨窶ーテ溪?堋ャ窶堙??愿シ窶堙ェ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙ア窶堙??堋オ窶堋スツ。
窶堋「窶堋「窶堋ヲツ、窶纏窶堋オ窶ーテ溪?堋ャ窶堙??堙??堋ゥ窶堋ッ窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙ア窶堙??堋オ窶堋スツ。
窶堋「窶堋「窶堋ヲツ、窶伉ス窶ーテ溪?堋ャ窶堙??牢窶「窶敘?o窶堋ヲ窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙ア窶堙??堋オ窶堋スツ。
窶堋「窶堋「窶堋ヲツ、ナ?ツヲ窶ーテ溪?堋ャ窶堙??ーj窶堋ー窶堙懌?堋コ窶堙ア窶堙??堋オ窶堋スツ。



ナスナスナ陳ア窶堋ェ窶堋?窶堙ゥ窶堋オツ、窶堋ス窶堋ュ窶堋ウ窶堙アツ宿窶佚ィ窶堋ェ窶堋?窶堙ゥ窶堋オツ、ツ債。ツ週窶堙坂?纏窶堋オ窶堋「ツ。
窶堙「窶堋ウ窶堋オ窶堋「窶堋オツ、ツ親ツ静倪?堋セ窶堋オツ、窶堋「窶堋「ツ人窶堙??堋キツ。
ツ静ヲツ青カ窶堙最陳オ窶堋オ窶堋「窶堋オツ、窶卍キ窶堋「ニ椎槌竹ツーニ暖窶堙ーツ鞘?倪?堋ゥ窶堙遺?堋ュ窶堋ソ窶堙。窶堋「窶堋ッ窶堙遺?堋「窶堋オツ、ナ弛ツ催鞘?堙固ステカ窶ケテ??堙ーナステヲ窶堙ィ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙アツ。
ツ食窶堙冷?「ツィ窶堙坂?堋ィ窶堋「窶堋オ窶堋ュ窶堙遺?堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋ス窶堋オツ、ナ陳セ窶杯窶堋ェ窶堙ュ窶堋ゥ窶堙ァ窶堙遺?堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋ス窶堋オツ、窶板キツ行窶堙最?y窶堋オ窶堙遺?堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋スツ。
窶「窶版ステ冷?堙ー窶堙絶?堋「窶堙??堋「窶堙ゥ窶堋オツ、ツ催ー窶愿コニ恥ツーニ弾ニ達窶堙可行窶堙≫?堋ス窶堋オツ、ツ行窶堋ッ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。
ナ?ツソナスナ。窶堋ェ窶愿??堙溪?堙遺?堋「窶堋オツ、窶「ツカ窶邸窶堋ェ窶堙ュ窶堋ゥ窶堙ァ窶堙遺?堋「窶堋オツ、ツ新窶「ツキ窶堙ー窶愿??堙溪?堙遺?堋「ツ。
窶愿コ窶怒ナ津ェ窶堙ーヒ彙窶堋ケ窶堙ゥ窶堋オツ、窶堙?窶堋、窶佚・ツ人窶堋セ窶堋オツ、窶板キツ行窶堋ェ窶堙??堋ォ窶堙懌?堋キツ。



ナスq窶ケナク窶堙固スナセツ、ナ?wツ校窶堙俄?「テ?窶堋ッ窶堋スツ、ナステ披?堋ェ窶ー^窶彎窶堙??堋ォ窶堙遺?堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋スツ。
窶ー窶昶?「M窶堙ー窶敞停?堋ヲ窶堙懌?堋キツ。
窶愿コ窶怒ナ津ェ窶堙ー窶「テ冷?ケツュ窶堋キ窶堙ゥ窶堙娯?堙?、窶愿コ窶怒窶堙可行窶堙≫?堙??堙昶?堋ス窶堋「ツ。
ナ椎ス窶堙可行窶堙≫?堙??堙昶?堋ス窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋スツ。
ヒ?ェ窶愿コ窶堙俄?愿アナスナセナ?テ披?堋ョ窶堙ァ窶堋「窶「テ冷?ケツュ窶堋キ窶堙ゥツ。
ヒ?ェツ週ナ?テ披?堙架?ェ窶ーテアニ椎槌湛ニ暖ニ停?ーニ停?懌?堙可行窶堋ュツ。
#8 doesn't fit right with me, but here's what I have: ヒ?ェニ停?「ナ椎ス窶堙架彁窶「S窶毒凪?ー~窶堙ーナスg窶堋「窶堙懌?堋キツ。(Are they asking me how much I use in a month, as in, spend in a month?)



窶吮??ツ坂?佛津ェ窶堋ェヒ彙窶堋ケ窶堙ゥツ。
窶ーj窶堋ー窶堙遺?堋「ツ。
ツ静ェ窶禿・窶堋ェナ塚??堙溪?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。
窶督セ窶愿コナ?wツ校窶堙可行窶堋ッ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。(窶堙や?堙?窶堙ィ)
窶堋ス窶堋ュ窶堋ウ窶堙アツ食窶堙冷?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥツ。
ツ債。窶愿コ窶堙債出窶堋ゥ窶堋ッ窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。



窶堋ア窶堙≫?堙 (窶堙??堙ア窶堙按?) 窶ーテ娯?堙ー窶ーテ娯?堋ヲ窶堙懌?堋キ窶堋ゥツ?
窶堙??堋ア窶堙???窶堋「窶「ナセ窶堙ー窶敞停?堋ヲ窶堙懌?堋キ窶堋ゥツ?
ツ催ー窶禿ゥ窶堙債寝窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋スツ。
ナスq窶ケナク窶堙固スナセ窶堙家痴ツーニ筑ニ停?懌?堙ーツ食窶堙冷?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋ス窶堋ェツ、ツ債。ニ痴ツーニ筑ニ停?懌?堙ーツ食窶堙冷?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥツ。
窶堋ィツ青ウナ椎ス窶吮?ヲ窶「ツィ窶堙ー窶吮?ヲ窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙懌?堋オ窶堋スツ。

Then, before I went off the potentials completely, I remembered I wanted to ask this:
窶堋、窶堋ソ窶堙俄?ケA窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。
窶怒窶堋ェ窶敞停?堋ヲ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。

Are these acceptable? I'm 99% sure the second one is.



ニ陳?但ニ椎?窶堙才?ェ窶愿コ窶堙架?ェナスナセナ?テ披?愿コ窶怒ナ津ェ窶堙姑弾ツーニ致窶堙ー窶「ツキ窶堋ォ窶堙懌?堋キツ。
ニ淡ニ停?。ニ停?懌?堙才?ェツ週ナ?テ披?堙架?ェ窶ーテアニ湛ツーニ恥ツー窶堙鳴行窶堋ォ窶堙懌?堋キツ。
窶堙昶?堋ソ窶堋ア窶堙才?ェニ停?「ナ椎ス窶堙俄?愿ア窶ーテア窶敞停?堋「窶「ツィ窶堙ー窶堋オ窶堙懌?堋キツ。
ニ単ニ停?懌?堙才?ェ窶扼窶堙架?ェ窶忸窶板キツ行窶堙ー窶堋オ窶堙懌?堋キツ。

My own sentences. I wanted to see if they will work in the past:
ニ湛ニ弾ニ達ツーニ置窶堙債静ヲツ週窶堙架?ェ窶ーテアニ但ニ停?ケニ弛ニ辰ニ暖窶堙俄?「テ?窶堋「窶堋スツ。
窶「テェ窶堙坂?ケナス窶扼窶堙俄?愿アツ週ナ?テ板静ヲツ青カ窶堋セ窶堙≫?堋スツ。
Then, these:
ツ静ヲツ週窶堙俄?愿ア窶ーテアツ好窶堋ォ窶堙鞍椎槌湛ニ暖ニ停?ーニ停?懌?堙可食窶堙冷?堙可行窶堙≫?堙??堙昶?堋スツ。
I tried to go to your favorite restaurant twice last week.
ツ債。ツ行窶堋ッ窶堙遺?堋「ツ、窶凅窶堋ュツ債。ナ椎スツ行窶堋ォ窶堋サ窶堋、窶堙??堋キツ。/ ツ行窶堋ッ窶堙ゥ窶堋ゥ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ェ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙アツ。
I cant come now, but it looks like I can come later this month. / but I can probably come later this month.
窶堋ゥ窶堋ウ窶堙債重窶堋ュ窶堙遺?堋ウ窶堋サ窶堋、窶堙??堋キツ。
窶堋サ窶堙ェ窶堙坂?凖俄?堋ュ窶堋サ窶堋、窶堙?窶堙遺?堋「ツ。
ツ静ヲツ青カ窶堙俄?堙遺?堙ィ窶堋サ窶堋、窶堙?窶堙遺?堋「ツ。
窶愿コ窶怒窶堙可行窶堙≫?堋ス窶堋ア窶堙??堋ェ窶堋?窶堙ゥ窶堋ゥ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。


And with that, this begins Chapter 14. This is the chapter with morau/ageru/kureru.


ニ耽ニ単ニ歎窶堙坂?堋ッ窶堋ソ窶堋ゥ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ェ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙アツ。
ニ陳?但ニ椎?窶堙坂?堋ゥ窶堙披?堋ォ窶堙俄?ケツサ窶督。窶堋ェ窶堙遺?堋「窶堋ゥ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。
ニ蓄ニ蛋ニ坦窶堙坂?堋サ窶堙固ステ環真窶堋ェ窶堙吮?堋オ窶堋「窶堋ゥ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。
窶堋ア窶堙姑短ツーニ耽ツー窶堙最ス窶樞?堙嫁ス窶板坂?。窶堙ュ窶堙遺?堋「窶堋ゥ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ェ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙アツ。
ニ耽ニ単ニ歎窶堙哉陳?但ニ椎?窶堙家致ニ陳哉竹ツーニ炭窶堋キ窶堙ゥ窶堋ゥ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ェ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙アツ。


ニ筑ニ探ニ棚窶堙坂?堋「窶堙や?堙?窶堋「窶堋サ窶堋ェ窶堋オ窶堋ゥ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ェ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙アツ。
ニ塚?脱ニ坦窶堙最?wツ校窶堙??「テ冷?ケツュ窶堋キ窶堙ゥ窶堋ゥ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ェ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙アツ。
ニ湛ツー窶堙最スナスナ陳ア窶堙個青ャツ静鯛?堋ェ窶堋「窶堋「窶堋ゥ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ェ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙アツ。
ツ催ー窶禿ゥツ寝窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋ス窶堋ゥ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ェ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙アツ。


窶版。窶氾ーツ鞘?倪?堙ー窶ーテッナステ絶?堙俄?倪?披?堙ィ窶堋ス窶堙ァツ?
ニ恥ツーニ弾ニ達窶堙俄?堋「窶堋ォ窶堋ス窶堙ァ窶堙??堋、窶堋ゥツ?
窶伉≫?堋ュツ寝窶堋ス窶堙ァ窶堙??堋、窶堙??堋キ窶堋ゥツ?
ツ静ヲツ青カ窶堙可坂?。窶堋「窶堋ス窶堙ァツ?

--The part with kureru, morau, and ageru--

ニ単ニ停?懌?堙哉湛ツー窶堙俄?扠窶堙ー窶堋?窶堋ー窶堋スツ。/ ニ湛ツー窶堙哉単ニ停?懌?堙俄?扠窶堙ー窶堙?窶堙ァ窶堙≫?堋スツ。
ナス窶樞?堋ェニ湛ツー窶堙嫁スツォツ鞘?倪?堙ー窶堋?窶堋ー窶堋スツ。/ ニ湛ツー窶堙最ス窶樞?堋ゥ窶堙ァナスツォツ鞘?倪?堙ー窶堙?窶堙ァ窶堙≫?堋スツ。
Skipping the give part, ニ湛ツー窶堙最ス窶樞?堙家歎ニ槌槌団窶堙ー窶堋ュ窶堙ェ窶堋スツ。
ナス窶樞?堋ェニ単ニ停?懌?堙嫁スナセナ致窶堙ー窶堋?窶堋ー窶堋スツ。/ ニ単ニ停?懌?堙最ス窶樞?堙俄?堙壺?堋オ窶堙ー窶堋ュ窶堙ェ窶堋スツ。


窶認窶傳窶堋ゥ窶堙ァ窶堋ィ窶ケテ?窶堙ー窶堙懌?堙ァ窶堋「窶堙懌?堋オ窶堋スツ。
窶ーテ??伉ー窶堙可新窶堋オ窶堋「窶佚、ツ焦?窶堙ー窶堋?窶堋ー窶堋スツ。
窶ーテ??伉ー窶堙家樽ニ耽ツー窶堙ー窶堋ュ窶堙ェ窶堋スツ。
?
?
窶堙??堙?窶堋セ窶堋ソ窶堙俄?ーf窶ーテヲ窶堙個静倪?「窶樞?堙ー窶堋?窶堋ー窶堋ス窶堋「ツ。
ツ?
ツ?
I want to clarify before I do them. I will do them once I understand it.
4: On Valentines day, what have you experienced getting? What have you given?
5: On Valentines day, what have you experienced receiving? What have you received?
7: What's the best present (that made you glad?)? Who did you recieve it from?
8: What's the best present (that made you sad?)? Who did you recieve it from?

If my interpretations are right I'll fill them out.

Thank you in advance for helping me out, guys.
 

Your interpretations are for the most part correct except for number 4.

4. Have you given anything on Valentines day before? What have you given?
5. Have you received anything on Valentines day before? What have you received?
6. What present made you the happiest? Who was it from?
7. What present made you unhappy? Who was it from?
 
Ah yes, a simple typo, I meant to put giving. I'll do them in a while, thanks!
 
Hi Putrefaction,

You got the potential forms, ツ〜窶堋キ窶堋ャ窶堙?〜ツ(窶堙ァツ)窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋「, ツ〜窶堋オツ、ツ〜窶堋オ phrase right.


~~~~~
ナスq窶ケナク窶堙固スナセツ、ナ?wツ校窶堙懌?堙?/COLOR]窶「テ?窶堋ッ窶堋スツ(ナ?wツ校窶堙可/窶堙懌?堙??「テ?窶堋「窶堙??堋「窶堋ッ窶堋ス sounds more natural)窶堋ェツ、
ナステ披?堙ー窶ー^窶彎窶堙??堋ォ窶堙遺?堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋スツ。ツ(ナステ披?堋ェ is also OK, ナステ披?堙娯?ー^窶彎窶堋ェ窶堙??堋ォ窶堙遺?堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋ス is another option)

窶ー窶昶?「M窶堙ー窶敞停?堋ヲ窶堙懌?堋キツ。(or 窶ー窶昶?「M窶堋ェ窶敞停?堋ヲ窶堙懌?堋キ as the question is 窶ーツス窶堋ェツ)


窶愿コ窶怒ナ津ェ窶堙ー窶「テ冷?ケツュ窶堋オ窶堙??堋「窶堙ゥ窶堙娯?堙?、窶愿コ窶怒窶堙可行窶堙≫?堙??堙昶?堋ス窶堋「ツ。
(because you're already learning Japanese.)

ナ椎ス窶堙可行窶堙≫?堙??堙昶?堋ス窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋スツ。

It's OK as the answer to Q4, but to Q3 you should make it present as it is asking about ツ債。.

ヒ?ェ窶愿コ窶堙俄?愿アナスナセナ?テ披?堋ョ窶堙ァ窶堋「窶「テ冷?ケツュ窶堋キ窶堙ゥツ。
ヒ?ェツ週ナ?テ披?堙架?ェ窶ーテアニ椎槌湛ニ暖ニ停?ーニ停?懌?堙可行窶堋ュツ。
ツ週窶堙架?ェ窶ーテア... is also OK (and maybe more commonly used.)

As for Q8, your interpretation is correct, it means "how much do you spend a month?"
Here ナスg窶堋、 means "to spend money". so your answer
ヒ?ェニ停?「ナ椎ス窶堙架彁窶「S窶毒凪?ー~窶堙ーナスg窶堋「窶堙懌?堋キツ。
is good! (And I wish I could spend that much in a month! )
~~~
You answered correctly for the next group of questions.

窶吮??ツ坂?佛津ェ窶堋ェヒ彙窶堋ケ窶堙ゥツ。
窶ーj窶堋ー窶堙遺?堋「ツ。
ツ静ェ窶禿・窶堋ェナ塚??堙溪?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。
窶督セ窶愿コナ?wツ校窶堙可行窶堋ッ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。(窶堙や?堙?窶堙ィ)
窶堋ス窶堋ュ窶堋ウ窶堙アツ食窶堙冷?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥツ。
ツ債。窶愿コ窶堙債出窶堋ゥ窶堋ッ窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。

~~~
窶堋ア窶堙≫?堙 (窶堙??堙ア窶堙按?) 窶ーテ娯?堙ー窶ーテ娯?堋ヲ窶堙懌?堋キ窶堋ゥツ?
should be 窶堙??堙ア窶堙?/COLOR]窶ーテ娯?堙ー窶ーテ娯?堋ヲ窶堙懌?堋キ窶堋ゥツ?

The rest of the answers are OK.

窶堙??堋ア窶堙???窶堋「窶「ナセ窶堙ー窶敞停?堋ヲ窶堙懌?堋キ窶堋ゥツ?
ツ催ー窶禿ゥ窶堙債寝窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋スツ。
ナスq窶ケナク窶堙固スナセ窶堙家痴ツーニ筑ニ停?懌?堙ーツ食窶堙冷?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋ス窶堋ェツ、ツ債。ニ痴ツーニ筑ニ停?懌?堙ーツ食窶堙冷?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥツ。
窶堋ィツ青ウナ椎ス窶吮?ヲ窶「ツィ窶堙ー窶吮?ヲ窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙懌?堋オ窶堋スツ。

Though the last one would be more natural to say
窶堋ィツ青ウナ椎ス窶堙俄?吮?ヲ窶「ツィ窶堙ー窶吮?ヲ窶堙ゥ窶堋ア窶堙??堋ェ窶堙??堋ォ窶堙懌?堋オ窶堋スツ。

~~~

Yes, both are correct!


ニ陳?但ニ椎?窶堙才?ェ窶愿コ窶堙架?ェナスナセナ?テ披?愿コ窶怒ナ津ェ窶堙姑弾ツーニ致窶堙ー窶「ツキ窶堋ォ窶堙懌?堋キツ。
ニ淡ニ停?。ニ停?懌?堙才?ェツ週ナ?テ披?堙架?ェ窶ーテアニ湛ツーニ恥ツー窶堙鳴行窶堋ォ窶堙懌?堋キツ。
窶堙昶?堋ソ窶堋ア窶堙才?ェニ停?「ナ椎ス窶堙俄?愿ア窶ーテア窶敞停?堋「窶「ツィ窶堙ー窶堋オ窶堙懌?堋キツ。
ニ単ニ停?懌?堙才?ェ窶扼窶堙架?ェ窶忸窶板キツ行窶堙ー窶堋オ窶堙懌?堋キツ。

In the above sentences, ヒ?ェツ週ナ?テ披?堙可/ヒ?ェニ停?毒椎ス窶堙可/ヒ?ェ窶扼窶堙 are OK but usually we say
ツ週窶堙架?ェ窶ーテアツ、ナ椎ス窶堙俄?愿ア窶ーテアツ、窶扼窶堙架?ェ窶忸
~~~

ニ但ニ停?ケニ弛ニ辰ニ暖窶堙俄?「テ?窶堋ュ sounds a bit awkward. Also ツ静ヲツ週 does not take 窶堙 but stands on its own.
If Steve walked to the place for his part-time job, then
ニ湛ニ弾ニ達ツーニ置窶堙債静ヲツ週ヒ?ェ窶忸ニ但ニ停?ケニ弛ニ辰ニ暖窶堙俄?「テ?窶堋「窶堙??堋「窶堙≫?堋スツ。

窶「テェ窶堙坂?ケナス窶扼窶堙俄?愿アツ週ナ?テ板静ヲツ青カ窶堋セ窶堙≫?堋スツ。
Same about 窶ケナス窶扼ツ、 it does not need 窶堙?
窶「テェ窶堙坂?ケナス窶扼窶愿アツ週ナ?テ板静ヲツ青カ窶堋セ窶堙≫?堋スツ。
Do you mean ツ静ヲツ青カ窶堙??堋オ窶堙??慊ュ窶堋「窶堋ス by ツ静ヲツ青カ窶堋セ窶堙≫?堋スツ?

ツ静ヲツ週ツ not ツ静ヲツ週窶堙
Otherwise it is OK.


ツ債。窶堙梗/COLOR]ツ行窶堋ッ窶堙遺?堋「窶堋ェツ、ツ債。ナ椎ス窶ーツコツ旬窶堙俄?堙債行窶堋ュ窶堋ゥ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ェ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙ア or ツ行窶堋ッ窶堋サ窶堋、窶堙??堋キ
ツ行窶堋ォ窶堋サ窶堋、ツ: something looks like it might go. It is strange to use about yourself because it sounds as if you're observing yourself as a third person...
ツ行窶堋ッ窶堋サ窶堋、ツ: might be able to come

Note: you use ツ行窶堋ュ for come.
It is OK but only when you're talking about coming to the person you're talking to.
Otherwise you should use 窶藩??堙ゥ.

窶堋ゥ窶堋ウ窶堙債重窶堋ュ窶堙遺?堋ウ窶堋サ窶堋、窶堙??堋キツ。ツ 窶嗜窶嗚
窶堋サ窶堙ェ窶堙坂?凖俄?堋ュ窶堋サ窶堋、窶堙?窶堙遺?堋「ツ。ツ ツ?ィツ 窶凖俄?堋ュ窶堙遺?堋ウ窶堋サ窶堋、窶堋セツ。
ツ静ヲツ青カ窶堙俄?堙遺?堙ィ窶堋サ窶堋、窶堙?窶堙遺?堋「ツ。ツ ツ?ィツ 窶堙遺?堙ェ窶堋サ窶堋、窶堙俄?堙遺?堋「ツ。
窶愿コ窶怒窶堙可行窶堙≫?堋ス窶堋ア窶堙??堋ェ窶堋?窶堙ゥ窶堋ゥ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。ツ 窶嗜窶嗚 (if you're describing someone else, not yourself)


窶版。窶氾ーツ鞘?倪?堙ー窶ーテッナステ絶?堙俄?倪?披?堙ィ窶堋ス窶堙ァツ? ツ?ィツ 窶倪?披?堙≫?堋ス窶堙ァツ?
ニ恥ツーニ弾ニ達窶堙俄?堋「窶堋ォ窶堋ス窶堙ァ窶堙??堋、窶堋ゥツ?ツ ツ?ィツ ツ行窶堙≫?堋ス窶堙ァ窶堙??堋、窶堙??堋キ窶堋ゥツ?
窶伉≫?堋ュツ寝窶堋ス窶堙ァ窶堙??堋、窶堙??堋キ窶堋ゥツ?ツ 窶嗜窶嗚
ツ静ヲツ青カ窶堙可坂?。窶堋「窶堋ス窶堙ァツ?ツ ツ?ィツ 窶ーテッ窶堙≫?堋ス窶堙ァツ?

Be careful about the conjugation of some verbs.
Also ツ坂?。窶堋、 and ツ 窶ーテッ窶堋、 are different. To meet is 窶ーテッ窶堋、.
 
Hi Putrefaction,

You got the potential forms, ~すぎて~(ら)れない, ~し、~し phrase right.

Yay! Awesome!


"歩いていけた" I think I can dissect this, it's the te form of walk...in the past tense? So this goes all the way back to forget/forgot, I was going to ask why you would use the -te iketa instead of just -keta...:?

鉛筆を買えます。(or 鉛筆買えます as the question is 何

Should've seen this one!

日本語を勉強しているので、日本に行ってみたい。
(because you're already learning Japanese.)
Right! I know the -te form is to do the present, so...uh oh...back to the other question about -keta :\

月に行ってみたかった。

It's OK as the answer to Q4, but to Q3 you should make it present as it is asking about 今.
I think I missed a question!

一日に二時間ぐらい勉強する。
一週間に一回レストランに行く。
週に一回... is also OK (and maybe more commonly used.)

I guess if you don't put in a specific number, it's assumed as you're talking about one week?


Haha, I'm so used to just putting yen that I didn't think. Dollars would be more exact, and that's a lot for college student!!

You answered correctly for the next group of questions.
AWESOME!!

こっな (どんな?) 歌を歌えますか?
should be どんな歌を歌えますか?

I was thinking that, but I recently learned konna so I thought it'd be better to put that in, but donna makes more sense. Thanks!

Ah, a ni marker for the day. That'd make sense, as you'd use kayoubi ni... I remember way back in Genki I you don't always need to use ni regarding times of the day and relative things to the present, is that right?

In the above sentences, 一週間に/一ヶ月に/一年に are OK but usually we say
週に一回、月に二回、年に一度

I actually wanted to ask you about the 年に一度. I remember this means "one year one time", could I have also used 年に一回? Or conversely, 週に一度?



I see, most of the questions I have on this are already asked above. I think what I asked is true.

Same about 去年、 it does not need に.
母は去年二週間先生だった。
Do you mean 先生として働いた by 先生だった?

I usually mess these things up. The first sentence was supposed to read:
My mother was a teacher for two weeks last year.
母は去年二週間先生だった。

I haven't done the -te (another verb) form yet so I assume I'm wrong on this one.


Aah, not even close. Haha!

それは痛くそうもない。 → 痛くなさそうだ。
The one I wrote applies to verbs only, the first to adjectives? I should've remembered!

先生になりそうもない。 → なれそうにない。
Sorry, I never did this one...would you mind giving me a basic overview of this form? Is it specific to naru?

日本に行ったことがあるかもしれない。 OK (if you're describing someone else, not yourself)

And if I was describing myself, what would it be? I was actually writing this for myself. Just take out the whole koto ga aru, leave it itta kamoshiremasen?



Holy snap, I completely blanked out and I put the verb stem (before the -masu) instead of the past tense.

Be careful about the conjugation of some verbs.
Also 合う and 会う are different. To meet is 会う.

Are the hiragana the same? I put it in my iPhone and that's what popped out, weird.

:sorry::sorry::sorry::sorry: Thank you so much! I'll post the other ones I left out and such. I'll also definitely leave you rep when I can!!
 
I know I had questions, I also want to add some more in this post. Too many, I know...


I went back and looked at "looks like..." and came up with these:

この本は古そうですね?(This book looks old, doesn't it?)
いいえ、古くなさそう。(No, it doesn't look old.)
古そうな本を持っている。(I'm carrying an old book.)
家に早く帰れそうです。/ 家に早く帰れそうもありません。
This one I'm going to type out my explanation. It should read:
It looks like I can go home early! / It doesn't look like I can go home early.
I combined the possible form, with looks like, with an adverb before it.
kaeru = ri verb, therefore its possible is kaereru.
soo = take verb stem (before -masu), therefore kaereru -> kaeresoodesu.
To negate, after soo, put mo and arimasen. kaeresoomoarimasen.

Sorry for the romaji. But I have a feeling that the last one's wrong too!

Now on to that #7 from the ageru/morau/kureru. It reads:
一番うれしかったプレゼントは何ですか?

The part where I'm confused, as I've never seen it before, is highlighted in blue. This is no qualifier, is it? I can understand it clearly as you can see, but for some reason the structure isn't sinking in? I can see it's talking about the past tense as signified by katta, so is this a regular adjective in the past tense just modifying "present"?


Thank you once again for answering my many questions

--edit
I thought it'd automerge, weird. In any case, sorry for the double post!
 
いけた (行けた) is not related to 歩いて(い)た。 It is the past potential form of 行く (歩く+いく = to go to by foot, by walking) used in responding to the question contrasting childhood and adult abilities. 歩いていくことが出来たけど。。。 is fine too, of course.

 
ナ陳ゥ窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ 窶堙昶?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ
ナ陳ゥ窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ is not inccorect for the potential form of ナ陳ゥ窶堙ゥ, but ナ陳ゥ窶堋ヲ窶堙ゥ is more commonly used. ナ陳ゥ窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ tends to be used as the passive form.

窶督セ窶愿コナ?wツ校窶堙可行窶堋ッ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。(窶堙や?堙?窶堙ィ)
When you use 窶堙や?堙?窶堙ィ, it should be ツ行窶堋ゥ窶堙遺?堋「窶堙や?堙?窶堙ィ. The potential form + 窶堙や?堙?窶堙ィ is odd in meaning in this usage of 窶堙や?堙?窶堙ィ.

Sorry, I never did this one...would you mind giving me a basic overview of this form? Is it specific to naru?
窶堙遺?堙ゥツ?ィ窶堙遺?堙ィ窶堋サ窶堋、窶堙?窶堙遺?堋「
(Someone) seems not to become a teacher.
窶堙遺?堙ェ窶堙ゥ(the potential form)ツ?ィ窶堙遺?堙ェ窶堋サ窶堋、窶堙?窶堙遺?堋「
I couldn't become a teacher./(Someone) seems not to be able to become a teacher.

And if I was describing myself, what would it be? I was actually writing this for myself. Just take out the whole koto ga aru, leave it itta kamoshiremasen?
Yes, except your memory is so vague.



That past form shows that ツ(ツ債。窶堙懌?堙?ステ?ツ催帚?堙俄?禿。窶堙≫?堋ス窶吮??窶堙?)ヒ?ェ窶敕披?堋、窶堙ェ窶堋オ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋スニ致ニ椎槌端ニ停?愴暖, the best present in the ones you've really received. Whereas ヒ?ェ窶敕披?堋、窶堙ェ窶堋オ窶堋「ニ致ニ椎槌端ニ停?愴暖 means the best present you want now including the ones you haven't received yet.
 
The resultant verb negation turning "-sou da" into "-sou mo nai/nakatta" actually ends up fairly emphatic. It is not a horribly common combination. I would translate the reibun as follows : There's no way that I'll be able to go home early !/There's no sign I'll be able to go leave early. など。。。 ☝


What's the happiest present you received ? It is a modifier of present.
 

Yeah I thought of "happiest present" but that sounds kind of really strange in english for me. I envision the present having a huge smilie face being plastered on it or something.

:?
 
Yeah I thought of "happiest present" but that sounds kind of really strange in english for me. I envision the present having a huge smilie face being plastered on it or something.
:?
より、「喜ばれたプレゼント」は普通だと思います。でも、「喜ばせたプレゼント」は聞いたことがない。。。 :? Happiest present sort of slides off the tongue like a funny casual mix of English and some other dialect...but other descriptors are OK (most terrifying,most memorable/most treasured present) and this IS Japanese that will never win a medal for conciseness after all...
 
Ah, I see. The subject of the adjectival clause is not the present but "you" in the example sentense. Maybe where you stumbled was here?

ツ(窶斗窶堙債)窶堋ア窶堙姑致ニ椎槌端ニ停?愴暖窶堋ェ窶堋、窶堙ェ窶堋オ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋スツ。: I was happy (to receive) this present.
ツ(窶斗窶堋ェツ)窶堋、窶堙ェ窶堋オ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋スニ致ニ椎槌端ニ停?愴暖: the present I was happy (to receive)

ツ(窶堋?窶堙遺?堋ス窶堋ェ窶伉。窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙?)ヒ?ェ窶敕披?堋、窶堙ェ窶堋オ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋スニ致ニ椎槌端ニ停?愴暖: the present you were/felt happiest to receive


ツ(窶伉。窶堙≫?堙??佛?ナスティ窶堙可)ナ?テャ窶堙寂?堙ェ窶堋スニ致ニ椎槌端ニ停?愴暖 refers to a description on the giver side. In contrast, ツ(窶伉。窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙?スツゥ窶「ツェ窶堋ェツ)窶堋、窶堙ェ窶堋オ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋ス/ナ?テャ窶堙ア窶堋セニ致ニ椎槌端ニ停?愴暖 does on the receiver side.;-)
 
But isn't うれしかった in the past tense? I'm so confused on this. The only thing I can see is there's no verb so to modify anyting in the past tense I guess I'd have to be the adjective... :? What if I just made it ureshii puresento like I'd normally make it?
 
sorry for the late reply!
thanks for the links to the other discussion and explanations, i think i have kureru/ageru/morau down now.
arigatou gozaimashita~~!
 

窶堙?窶堙ァ窶堙≫?堙??堋、窶堙ェ窶堋オ窶堋「ニ致ニ椎槌端ニ停?愴暖
presents which you are happy to receive (anytime, or in the future)
窶堙?窶堙ァ窶堙≫?堙??堋、窶堙ェ窶堋オ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋スニ致ニ椎槌端ニ停?愴暖
presents you've already received and felt happy about
 
So is the うれしかった modifying the プレゼント or the time in which it is? I'm still confused and I'm sorry!

omoshiroi hon = interesting book
omoshirokatta hon = (was) interesting book?
 
"you've already received and were/felt happy at the time," as repeatedly mentioned.

omoshiroi hon = interesting book
omoshirokatta hon = (was) interesting book?
窶堋ィ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ォ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋ス窶怒
the book you've already read and felt interesting/were interested in (at the time)

This doesn't mean "not interested in now."
 
おもしろかった本
the book you've already read and felt interesting/were interested in (at the time)
This doesn't mean "not interested in now."
Very similar to English. More natural is "a book that I thought was interesting."
Omoshirokatta to omotta hon. In Japanese, though, I understand this implies no longer interested, or a loss of interest from the time it was read to the present. :?
 
Not sinking in. Not your fault, it's my fault, just like the -ta / -te ita problem I have.


I'm just stumbled all together. I'm sure you see that in the latter posts.
See, your first sentence makes perfect sense to me because I've been using it since forever, it's past tense at the end of a sentence which means it modifies the feeling to past tense and therefore the sentence. And if I made it ureshii instead of ureshikatta, it'd be in the present.
The second one is an adjective before a noun, so it means it's modifying the noun. I can also do this, just like omoshiroi hon. Elizabeth said:
What's the happiest present you received ? It is a modifier of present.

But I don't understand, it's before the present, so isn't it modifying the noun as well as time or am I getting that wrong too?

the best present in the ones you've really received. Whereas 一番うれしいプレゼント means the best present you want now including the ones you haven't received yet.

I understand and it makes sense but it's just not sinking in.

Should I be thinking "was happy present" in terms of ureshikatta puresento vs "happy present" in terms of ureshii puresento? Can you give me another example so I can type out what I think?
 
No. That's not just an adjective but more likely an adjectival clause modifying ニ致ニ椎槌端ニ停?愴暖, as already wrote. The subject of the clause, "I," is omitted in the second example.

ツ(窶斗窶堋ェツ債。窶堙懌?堙??堙俄?伉。窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙?)窶堋、窶堙ェ窶堋オ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋スニ致ニ椎槌端ニ停?愴暖: the present I was happy to receive(not "was happy present")

Very similar to English. More natural is "a book that I thought was interesting."
Omoshirokatta to omotta hon. In Japanese, though, I understand this implies no longer interested, or a loss of interest from the time it was read to the present. :?
Depending on the context(e.g. ナスq窶ケナク窶堙個債?窶堙坂?堋ィ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ォ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋ス窶怒), yes. But 窶堋ィ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ォ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋ス窶怒 generally means the simple past, because 窶堋ィ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ォ窶堋「 is ナ?'ツ湘ョツ・ナ?'ナ?oナ蛋窶覇ナスナ? an emotional/sensuous adjective.
Need a word or phrase translated?
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…