Putrefaction
不幸中の幸い. . . がない.
- 7 Nov 2008
- 905
- 24
- Thread starter
-
- #551
その女の人は私から花をあげます does not work here again.
あげる means "to give", not "to get".
but how would you say
A gave X to B. (person talking is C)
or
B san recieved X from A. (person talking is C)
Both あげる and もらう can be used also for the third person, as in the thread Elizabeth-san quoted. So the answer is,
彼は彼女に花を買ってあげた。
彼女は彼に花を買ってもらった。
You know what's even more astounding, I understood that and I think I also have the hiragana down for that... omoshiroi setsumei shite kurete arigatou gosaimasu. (I'm only typing in romaji because I'm too lazy to get my phone.)面白い説明してくれてありがとうござします!
Ahhhh...~~the ever deepening mysteries of "kureru" ! I still get a headache from this....Kureru can be a favor/positive benefit given to the speaker of course or between two third parties, the recipient of which is an associate of the speaker, but the above sentence does translate to (In Group someone ha/ga ) GAVE her (the indirect object) flowers today. Which means to be fully grammatical the giver has to either be explicitly named or understand from context to be that significant other, etc. It simply describes the situation from the side of that giver...Ahh hah that old topic~! hazukashii
It really depends on what you want to focus on in the sentence. The fact that you received something or that someone gave something to you. When you use which is well difficult to define I think. But because the subject is often dropped in Japanese eventually understanding the nuance difference between morau and kureru are important I think.
If a girl said to me "Mite mite! kyou hana wo kureta yo! ureshii!" (look look! I got flowers today! I'm so happy!) I immediately think it must have been someone close to her (and in most cases its her boyfriend).
Morau can be marked with either particles に or から。And kureru can also be between 2 third parties.Okay, my head's swimming and I have work every day until Tuesday, but.
I understood what undrentide said in this post almost completely.
I have yet to read the second topic Elizabeth posted, and the first one was too complicated but I'll skim it over, hopefully it'll sink in.
Then, aardwolf asked:
So I came up with:
1) kara signifies morau
2) so then it would be morau
3) because morau is to recieve
Just my impressionAhhhh...~~the ever deepening mysteries of "kureru" ! I still get a headache from this....Kureru can be a favor/positive benefit given to the speaker of course or between two third parties, the recipient of which is an associate of the speaker, but the above sentence does translate to (In Group someone ha/ga ) GAVE her (the indirect object) flowers today. Which means to be fully grammatical the giver has to either be explicitly named or understand from context to be that significant other, etc. It simply describes the situation from the side of that giver...
"Mite mite! kyou hana wo kureta yo! ureshii!" = (look ! look ! (He) gave me flowers today ! I'm so happy !)
"Mite mite! kyou hana wo moratta! ureshii!" (look look! I got flowers today! I'm so happy!)
Ahhhh...~~the ever deepening mysteries of "kureru" ! I still get a headache from this....Kureru can be a favor/positive benefit given to the speaker of course or between two third parties, the recipient of which is an associate of the speaker, but the above sentence does translate to (In Group someone ha/ga ) GAVE her (the indirect object) flowers today. Which means to be fully grammatical the giver has to either be explicitly named or understand from context to be that significant other, etc. It simply describes the situation from the side of that giver...
"Mite mite! kyou hana wo kureta yo! ureshii!" = (look ! look ! (He) gave me flowers today ! I'm so happy !)
"Mite mite! kyou hana wo moratta! ureshii!" (look look! I got flowers today! I'm so happy!)
Morau can be marked with either particles に or から。And kureru can also be between 2 third parties.
Difference between ageru, kureru and morau...
Yeah, that can't be helped. It has to be kara with non human indirect objects.Yeah Kureru still really spins my head sometimes. Morau and ageru is more straight forward. The only real definite situation i use kureru in is when asking for a favor from a really good friend
Kara and ni both mark the giver when using morau. I'm told though that kara is more used when your talking about a giver thats not...human? Like for example
私は大学から諸学金をもらいました。
I received a scholarship from the university.
4: On Valentines day, what have you experienced getting? What have you given?
5: On Valentines day, what have you experienced receiving? What have you received?
7: What's the best present (that made you glad?)? Who did you recieve it from?
8: What's the best present (that made you sad?)? Who did you recieve it from?
Then, before I went off the potentials completely, I remembered I wanted to ask this:
窶堋、窶堋ソ窶堙俄?ケA窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。
窶怒窶堋ェ窶敞停?堋ヲ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。
Are these acceptable? I'm 99% sure the second one is.
ニ但ニ停?ケニ弛ニ辰ニ暖窶堙俄?「テ?窶堋ュ sounds a bit awkward. Also ツ静ヲツ週 does not take 窶堙 but stands on its own.My own sentences. I wanted to see if they will work in the past:
ニ湛ニ弾ニ達ツーニ置窶堙債静ヲツ週窶堙架?ェ窶ーテアニ但ニ停?ケニ弛ニ辰ニ暖窶堙俄?「テ?窶堋「窶堋スツ。
Same about 窶ケナス窶扼ツ、 it does not need 窶堙?窶「テェ窶堙坂?ケナス窶扼窶堙俄?愿アツ週ナ?テ板静ヲツ青カ窶堋セ窶堙≫?堋スツ。
ツ静ヲツ週ツ not ツ静ヲツ週窶堙Then, these:
ツ静ヲツ週窶堙俄?愿ア窶ーテアツ好窶堋ォ窶堙鞍椎槌湛ニ暖ニ停?ーニ停?懌?堙可食窶堙冷?堙可行窶堙≫?堙??堙昶?堋スツ。
I tried to go to your favorite restaurant twice last week.
ツ債。ツ行窶堋ッ窶堙遺?堋「ツ、窶凅窶堋ュツ債。ナ椎スツ行窶堋ォ窶堋サ窶堋、窶堙??堋キツ。/ ツ行窶堋ッ窶堙ゥ窶堋ゥ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ェ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙アツ。
I cant come now, but it looks like I can come later this month. / but I can probably come later this month.
Hi Putrefaction,
You got the potential forms, ~すぎて~(ら)れない, ~し、~し phrase right.
子供の時、学校まで歩けた(学校に/まで歩いていけた sounds more natural)が、
車を運転できなかった。(車が is also OK, 車の運転ができなかった is another option)
鉛筆を買えます。(or 鉛筆が買えます as the question is 何が)
Right! I know the -te form is to do the present, so...uh oh...back to the other question about -keta :\日本語を勉強しているので、日本に行ってみたい。
(because you're already learning Japanese.)
I think I missed a question!月に行ってみたかった。
It's OK as the answer to Q4, but to Q3 you should make it present as it is asking about 今.
一日に二時間ぐらい勉強する。
一週間に一回レストランに行く。
週に一回... is also OK (and maybe more commonly used.)
As for Q8, your interpretation is correct, it means "how much do you spend a month?"
Here 使う means "to spend money". so your answer
一ヵ月に六百万円を使います。
is good! (And I wish I could spend that much in a month!)
AWESOME!!You answered correctly for the next group of questions.
こっな (どんな?) 歌を歌えますか?
should be どんな歌を歌えますか?
Ah, a ni marker for the day. That'd make sense, as you'd use kayoubi ni... I remember way back in Genki I you don't always need to use ni regarding times of the day and relative things to the present, is that right?The rest of the answers are OK.
Though the last one...
お正月着物を着られました。
...would be more natural to say
お正月に着物を着ることができました。
In the above sentences, 一週間に/一ヶ月に/一年に are OK but usually we say
週に一回、月に二回、年に一度
アルバイトに歩く sounds a bit awkward. Also 先週 does not take に but stands on its own.
If Steve walked to the place for his part-time job, then
スティーブは先週一度アルバイトに歩いていった。
Same about 去年、 it does not need に.
母は去年二週間先生だった。
Do you mean 先生として働いた by 先生だった?
今は行けないが、今月下旬には行くかもしれません or 行けそうです
行きそう: something looks like it might go. It is strange to use about yourself because it sounds as if you're observing yourself as a third person...
行けそう: might be able to come
The one I wrote applies to verbs only, the first to adjectives? I should've remembered!それは痛くそうもない。 → 痛くなさそうだ。
Sorry, I never did this one...would you mind giving me a basic overview of this form? Is it specific to naru?先生になりそうもない。 → なれそうにない。
日本に行ったことがあるかもしれない。 OK (if you're describing someone else, not yourself)
履歴書を会社に送りたら? → 送ったら?
パーティにいきたらどうか? → 行ったらどうですか?
早く寝たらどうですか? OK
先生に合いたら? → 会ったら?
Be careful about the conjugation of some verbs.
Also 合う and 会う are different. To meet is 会う.
いけた (行けた) is not related to 歩いて(い)た。 It is the past potential form of 行く (歩く+いく = to go to by foot, by walking) used in responding to the question contrasting childhood and adult abilities. 歩いていくことが出来たけど。。。 is fine too, of course.Yay! Awesome!
"歩いていけた" I think I can dissect this, it's the te form of walk...in the past tense? So this goes all the way back to forget/forgot, I was going to ask why you would use the -te iketa instead of just -keta...:?
ナ陳ゥ窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ is not inccorect for the potential form of ナ陳ゥ窶堙ゥ, but ナ陳ゥ窶堋ヲ窶堙ゥ is more commonly used. ナ陳ゥ窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ tends to be used as the passive form.ナ陳ゥ窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ 窶堙昶?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ
When you use 窶堙や?堙?窶堙ィ, it should be ツ行窶堋ゥ窶堙遺?堋「窶堙や?堙?窶堙ィ. The potential form + 窶堙や?堙?窶堙ィ is odd in meaning in this usage of 窶堙や?堙?窶堙ィ.窶督セ窶愿コナ?wツ校窶堙可行窶堋ッ窶堙遺?堋「ツ。(窶堙や?堙?窶堙ィ)
窶堙遺?堙ゥツ?ィ窶堙遺?堙ィ窶堋サ窶堋、窶堙?窶堙遺?堋「Sorry, I never did this one...would you mind giving me a basic overview of this form? Is it specific to naru?
Yes, except your memory is so vague.And if I was describing myself, what would it be? I was actually writing this for myself. Just take out the whole koto ga aru, leave it itta kamoshiremasen?
I went back and looked at "looks like..." and came up with these:
窶堋ア窶堙娯?怒窶堙最津??堋サ窶堋、窶堙??堋キ窶堙仰?(This book looks old, doesn't it?)
窶堋「窶堋「窶堋ヲツ、ナ津??堋ュ窶堙遺?堋ウ窶堋サ窶堋、ツ。(No, it doesn't look old.)
ナ津??堋サ窶堋、窶堙遺?怒窶堙ーナスツ昶?堙≫?堙??堋「窶堙ゥツ。(I'm carrying an old book.)
窶ーテ??堙俄?伉≫?堋ュ窶ケA窶堙ェ窶堋サ窶堋、窶堙??堋キツ。/ 窶ーテ??堙俄?伉≫?堋ュ窶ケA窶堙ェ窶堋サ窶堋、窶堙?窶堋?窶堙ィ窶堙懌?堋ケ窶堙アツ。
This one I'm going to type out my explanation. It should read:
It looks like I can go home early! / It doesn't look like I can go home early.
I combined the possible form, with looks like, with an adverb before it.
kaeru = ri verb, therefore its possible is kaereru.
soo = take verb stem (before -masu), therefore kaereru -> kaeresoodesu.
To negate, after soo, put mo and arimasen. kaeresoomoarimasen.
That past form shows that ツ(ツ債。窶堙懌?堙?ステ?ツ催帚?堙俄?禿。窶堙≫?堋ス窶吮??窶堙?)ヒ?ェ窶敕披?堋、窶堙ェ窶堋オ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋スニ致ニ椎槌端ニ停?愴暖, the best present in the ones you've really received. Whereas ヒ?ェ窶敕披?堋、窶堙ェ窶堋オ窶堋「ニ致ニ椎槌端ニ停?愴暖 means the best present you want now including the ones you haven't received yet.Now on to that #7 from the ageru/morau/kureru. It reads:
ヒ?ェ窶敕披?堋、窶堙ェ窶堋オ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋スニ致ニ椎槌端ニ停?愴暖窶堙坂?ーツス窶堙??堋キ窶堋ゥツ?
The part where I'm confused, as I've never seen it before, is highlighted in blue. This is no qualifier, is it? I can understand it clearly as you can see, but for some reason the structure isn't sinking in? I can see it's talking about the past tense as signified by katta, so is this a regular adjective in the past tense just modifying "present"?
The resultant verb negation turning "-sou da" into "-sou mo nai/nakatta" actually ends up fairly emphatic. It is not a horribly common combination. I would translate the reibun as follows : There's no way that I'll be able to go home early !/There's no sign I'll be able to go leave early. など。。。 ☝I know I had questions, I also want to add some more in this post. Too many, I know...
I went back and looked at "looks like..." and came up with these:
この本は古そうですね?(This book looks old, doesn't it?)
いいえ、古くなさそう。(No, it doesn't look old.)
古そうな本を持っている。(I'm carrying an old book.)
家に早く帰れそうです。/ 家に早く帰れそうもありません。
This one I'm going to type out my explanation. It should read:
It looks like I can go home early! / It doesn't look like I can go home early.
I combined the possible form, with looks like, with an adverb before it.
kaeru = ri verb, therefore its possible is kaereru.
soo = take verb stem (before -masu), therefore kaereru -> kaeresoodesu.
To negate, after soo, put mo and arimasen. kaeresoomoarimasen.
What's the happiest present you received ? It is a modifier of present.Sorry for the romaji. But I have a feeling that the last one's wrong too!
Now on to that #7 from the ageru/morau/kureru. It reads:
一番うれしかったプレゼントは何ですか?
The part where I'm confused, as I've never seen it before, is highlighted in blue. This is no qualifier, is it? I can understand it clearly as you can see, but for some reason the structure isn't sinking in? I can see it's talking about the past tense as signified by katta, so is this a regular adjective in the past tense just modifying "present"?
The resultant verb negation turning "-sou da" into "-sou mo nai/nakatta" actually ends up fairly emphatic. It is not a horribly common combination. I would translate the reibun as follows : There's no way that I'll be able to go home early !/There's no sign I'll be able to go leave early. など。。。 ☝
What's the happiest present you received ? It is a modifier of present.
より、「喜ばれたプレゼント」は普通だと思います。でも、「喜ばせたプレゼント」は聞いたことがない。。。 :? Happiest present sort of slides off the tongue like a funny casual mix of English and some other dialect...but other descriptors are OK (most terrifying,most memorable/most treasured present) and this IS Japanese that will never win a medal for conciseness after all...Yeah I thought of "happiest present" but that sounds kind of really strange in english for me. I envision the present having a huge smilie face being plastered on it or something.
:?
But isn't 窶堋、窶堙ェ窶堋オ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋ス in the past tense? I'm so confused on this. The only thing I can see is there's no verb so to modify anyting in the past tense I guess I'd have to be the adjective... :? What if I just made it ureshii puresento like I'd normally make it?
"you've already received and were/felt happy at the time," as repeatedly mentioned.So is the 窶堋、窶堙ェ窶堋オ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋ス modifying the ニ致ニ椎槌端ニ停?愴暖 or the time in which it is? I'm still confused and I'm sorry!
窶堋ィ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ォ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋ス窶怒omoshiroi hon = interesting book
omoshirokatta hon = (was) interesting book?
Very similar to English. More natural is "a book that I thought was interesting."おもしろかった本
the book you've already read and felt interesting/were interested in (at the time)
This doesn't mean "not interested in now."
Ah, I see. The subject of the adjectival clause is not the present but "you" in the example sentense. Maybe where you stumbled was here?
(僕は)このプレゼントがうれしかった。: I was happy (to receive) this present.
(僕が)うれしかったプレゼント: the present I was happy (to receive)
(あなたが贈られて)一番うれしかったプレゼント: the present you were/felt happiest to receive
(贈って相手に)喜ばれたプレゼント refers to a description on the giver side. In contrast, (贈られて自分が)うれしかった/喜んだプレゼント does on the receiver side.;-)
What's the happiest present you received ? It is a modifier of present.
the best present in the ones you've really received. Whereas 一番うれしいプレゼント means the best present you want now including the ones you haven't received yet.
No. That's not just an adjective but more likely an adjectival clause modifying ニ致ニ椎槌端ニ停?愴暖, as already wrote. The subject of the clause, "I," is omitted in the second example.The second one is an adjective before a noun, so it means it's modifying the noun. I can also do this, just like omoshiroi hon. Elizabeth said:
But I don't understand, it's before the present, so isn't it modifying the noun as well as time or am I getting that wrong too?
Depending on the context(e.g. ナスq窶ケナク窶堙個債?窶堙坂?堋ィ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ォ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋ス窶怒), yes. But 窶堋ィ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ォ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堋ス窶怒 generally means the simple past, because 窶堋ィ窶堙?窶堋オ窶堙ォ窶堋「 is ナ?'ツ湘ョツ・ナ?'ナ?oナ蛋窶覇ナスナ? an emotional/sensuous adjective.Very similar to English. More natural is "a book that I thought was interesting."
Omoshirokatta to omotta hon. In Japanese, though, I understand this implies no longer interested, or a loss of interest from the time it was read to the present. :?