Women are not simply "sexual beings." I find the fact that you call them that offensive.
Nall-ohki said:
Is the fact that women are sexual beings offensive?
Way to misread. No where did I demean women by calling them "simply 'sexual beings'". Women are sexual, men are sexual; the whole human race and all mammals are sexual. Read up on it.
It's rather interesting that suggesting that women are sexual brings an attack like this.
www.answers.com said:
of·fen·sive (ə-fĕn'sĭv) pronunciation
adj.
1. Disagreeable to the senses: an offensive odor.
2. Causing anger, displeasure, resentment, or affront: an offensive gesture.
3.
1. Making an attack: The offensive troops gained ground quickly.
2. Of, relating to, or designed for attack: offensive weapons.
4. (ŏf'ĕn-) Sports. Of or relating to a team having possession of a ball or puck: the offensive line.
3 and
4 do not even relate.
1. is obviously not it, as it is a strange person to find young women's legs disagreeable to the senses (excepting for special cases).
2. Is the only possibility. Let's go one by one.
anger - Bare female legs make you angry? If that's so, I suggest you rethink the way you think about women. Like I said above, women and girls are sexual beings, and they play the game just like men do. Don't think that there aren't tons of boys in their school encouraging these girls to look this way. The girls desire to be popular, and doing this helps get them there.
displeasure - This is about the best one of the bunch - it could displease you because you think it distracts the boys. However, if this is the case,
displeasure is a better word for what you're feeling.
Offense is a strong word, and casual use just waters down its impact.
resentment - I suppose this could be the case if you're jealous of the girls for some reason. In this case I feel that's your problem - it's not the girls' job to not make you resent them.
affront - Only works if you feel that teenage hormones and sexual behavior are an affront to education, being a woman, or something else.