curmudgeon
Kouhai
- 1 Jul 2021
- 37
- 29
Isn't it possible that it's a given name, not a part of a family name? 努 can be a relatively common male given name, reading "Tsutomu".As they are constituent pieces of family names
The other has 女 on the left, ㄡ on the right (又, I suppose), and 刀 below.
Can you provide photos of the characters in question?
彡 Unicode U+5F61 is a component called "sanzukuri" in Japanese, and this component is never used at the left or upper left side of kanji ("Tukuri" means "the right component of kanji". The pronunciation "tsu" is changed to "zu" because of a phenomenon called rendaku here.) Thus, it actually must be 氵 Unicode U+6C35 "sanzui", as Majestic-san interpreted, and you would misread it.First Character:
left, NTC 1927, Unicode U+5F61; right, NTC 3039, Unicode U+5DE8; below, NTC 3450, Unicode U+6728
Right you are, Toritoribe! The copy I had made it look like U+5F61, or possibly 三 U+4E09,but in fact it is the one that Majestic identified, and the first part is ⺡, U+2EA1, the left variant of ⺢, U+2EA2. = radical 85. NTC Dictionary, which on the whole I find pretty useful, classifies U+5F61 as an up-down sign, № 1927, and tells the reader nothing about its being a right-only element; I would have thought that detail would be of interest to users of the dictionary. The correct element is № 1925 in the dictionary, on the same page; it seems to be a left-only sign, but nothing is said about this either.彡 Unicode U+5F61 is a component called "sanzukuri" in Japanese, and this component is never used at the left or upper left side of kanji ("Tukuri" means "the right component of kanji". The pronunciation "tsu" is changed to "zu" because of a phenomenon called rendaku here.) Thus, it actually must be 氵 Unicode U+6C35 "sanzui", as Majestic-san interpreted, and you would misread it.
If the top component is really ⼋, the kanji you are referring to might be 曾. As you can see in the following picture, if it's 會, there is a horizontal line under the top component, while the line doesn't exist in 曾.I am a bit uncertain about the top element of the second character, as in my source it looks more like ⼋
It's just variations in fonts/writing styles. Unlike the existence/non-existence of the horizontal line under the top component I mentioned in my previous post, you don't need to pay much attention to those differences.The top element in the second character is like the one on the right of the two examples provided by Toritoribe san, but with a short horizontal stroke running between the upper ends of the top sign, not touching either.
I have been out of touch for several weeks due to computer problems and being swamped with work, but I have continued to struggle with the project with which you have so generously helped me. Most of the items I believe have been pinned down, and about a few I am still uncertain. Let me trouble you once more, with the complete list (of families of the Abe Clan acc. to Kato). There are three sets.Majestic san, Toritoribe san, you have provided me with a wealth of information. I am most grateful. I am quite satisfied that the name in question is Kosobe. The top element in the second character is like the one on the right of the two examples provided by Toritoribe san, but with a short horizontal stroke running between the upper ends of the top sign, not touching either. Whatever it is, I don't believe that it changes the reading of the kanji. Apparently it is one more of a number of possible ways to write the second syllable of the name. I will make use of the links you have sent. I have only one more question at present, concerning a single character, which I shall bring up in a day or two. I am glad to have found your site and most grateful for the excellent help you have provided.
As I already wrote in my previous post, this character is 曾, i.e., the traditional form of 曽, not 會, i.e., the traditional form of 会. The most important point to distinguish 會 and 曾 is whether there is a horizontal line under the top component or not.Abe no Kosobe 阿倍 渠會倍 [Chūbu Region.]
NB 會 is the traditional orthography for the character now written as 会
The reading of 阿倍久努 is "Abenokunu", as I already pointed out in my previous post. "Hisa" is a reading of the single kanji 久, not the family name 久努.Abe no Hisa 阿倍 久努
You are confusing two different characters 拍 and 狛. The one you wrote is 拍, while the correct one is 狛.Abe no Koma 阿倍 拍
[There are at least eighteen komagatake mountains—'horse mountains'—in Japan, and many places named Koma because they were settled by immigrants from the Koguryo or 'Koma' kingdom in Korea; there is a Koma Clan of nobles descended from the royal house of Koguryo, not to be confused, of course, with Abe no Koma). 拍 could also be read as Utsu, but Koma seems correct here.]
The reading is Abenohiketa.Abe no Hikita 阿倍 引田
阿倍長田Abe no Nagata 阿倍 長田 [Kobe]
[Papinot, 'Mélanges,' p. 418, transcribes it as Nagata ; Frank & Kikuchi Brinkley, History of the Japanese People (1912), p. 93, transcribe it as Osada. ]
阿倍安積Abe no Azumi or Adzumi [1] 阿倍 安積
[This is a more complex issue than here represented. See the footnote. 安積 could also be read as Ansaka.]
阿倍柴田Abe no Shibata 阿倍 祡田 [Chūbu Region]
阿倍陸奥Abe no Mutsu 阿倍 陡奥 [traditional form of kanji : 奧]
It could also be read as Michinoku
阿倍磐城Abe no Banjō [no Iwaki?] 阿倍 磐城
阿倍猿嶋Abe no Sarushima 阿倍 猿嶋
[Papinot, loc. Cit., mentions Abe no Sarushima ; Sarushima is an island in Tokyo Bay, now serving as a national marine park. 猿嶋 could also be read as Kito.]
The following is the only one result of 阿倍旦 I can find out so far.Abe no Tan (no Ashita?) 阿倍 旦
阿倍小殿Abe no Shōden (no Koden?) 阿倍 小殿
阿倍志斐Abe no Shihi 阿倍 志斐
Majestic san, yes, essentially I am looking at the history of Abe clan. I am putting together some info for my Golden Years Girl, herself Abe no Mutsu. She knows family traditions that appear nowhere we have found, but has no training as a researcher. She learned kanji in school and knows more than most Japanese, who were taught a shorter list (I occasionally ask her to read some short thing in Chinese and she can do it fairly well). But when we came across this list she was stumped by a good deal of it, so I tackled it although it is well outside of any area I have any competence in. Fortunately I stumbled upon Japan Ref. and had the benefit of your comments and those of Toritoribe san, who has put up with my ignorance and guided me through a philological minefield. I had no intention of getting into orthography originally, but wanted to get that list of Abe families right. I had compiled a list from publications in several Western languages, and I now know that the authors of these, competent enough overall, were sometimes misled by the intricacies of what must be the world's most complicated writing system. The complexities were severe enough that I decided to do the list of names character by character. Some of the names I could figured out and some I would probably have got right sooner or later, but a lot of them would probably have gone unsolved were it not for the assistance I have received from you and Toritoribe san. I intend to flesh out the list with a bibliography and notes on how these names have been transcribed and sometimes misunderstood by the Western writers I have consulted. Wiktionary has been pretty helpful, with articles on each character. Koop and Inada is quite useful, but it's a century old and I wish someone would enlarge and revise it.Japanese use both Kunrei and Hepburn systems. If I'm not mistaken, they learn Kunrei-shiki up until Junior High School. From there forward, they use Hepburn.
To be honest though, I'm really confused about what you are trying to do. At first it seemed you were studying the history of the Abe family, but now it seems you are trying to study the orthography of the various branches of the Abe family?