- 15 Mar 2003
- 1,209
- 47
Granted you might have more first hand contact with things on the ground in China. But what is the government doing? That is where the rubber meets the road. A little spat between prime ministers doesn't mean war. All the signs point to the Chinese government gaining power in the region through trade and commerce.
Reducing something to ashes does not go well towards economic expoliation. Even the US in Iraq was careful to try and avoid destroying infrastructure that had possible economic benefit.
Last time I checked from US congressional testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, a few years ago, China did not possess the amphibious machines necessary to invade Taiwan. Hence all the missiles pointed at it. Granted they could have developed/bought the technology, but why undertake such a destabalizing action when the government is so keen on fostering trade?Soviet Soldier said:China can invade Taiwan now. They are just being halted because Americans could interfere with this Taiwan issue.
Reducing something to ashes does not go well towards economic expoliation. Even the US in Iraq was careful to try and avoid destroying infrastructure that had possible economic benefit.
Which is why I think they won't do the same to Japan - even if the US takes away its bases in the region. The last war in Iraq, though now is falling to pieces, did showcase to North Korea and China just what the US can do with only a portion of their forces. Arguably it brought North Korea closer to the table on issues about nuclear reactors.Sovet Soldier said:And the chinese or US surely doesn't want to have a war over this issue.
The current Chinese government is much more liberal than Mao. If Mao didn't want to expand, why would a more international and trade minded government want to expand into Japan?Soviet Soldier said:By the way, Chinese soldiers did not stayed in North Korea after the non agression pact of korean war, because
1) Chinese only helped North Korea because Americans and NATO forces were pretty closed to border of China when the NATO/US forces pulled North Koreans from the south. China were there to help North Korea in same time to secure their border from possitive offense from NATO/US forces. Chinese surely didnt stay in North Korea because Mao was not interested in having his PLA on his allies soil, in same time he did not wished to abosorb his fellow communist country into China.
It is generally accepted that the North Koreans got their hinders whipped and would have lost if China and the Soviet Union hadn't stepped in. Perhaps with the right equipment NK could have been a "formidable opponent" but they clearly didn't have any and had noway of maintaining or developing their fighting force without outside help.Soviet Solider said:2) If the chinese PLA would ever had stayed in North Korea, there could've possible threat from North Korea. And Chinese learned that North korea is formidible opponent when they ever declared war on North korea.
When I asked "for what purpose" I was asking why would China want to invade Japan not what you hoped to show by posting your ideas. Your views are very welcome here. Thank you for taking the time to add to the thread. I thought some might like seeing both sides of the issue. I think it is important to distinguish between what is possible and what is in reality probable (in the sense of the word that - it is possible to send manned spaceships to Planet (something) but the realities involved make it highly improbably) Same thing for China invading Japan.Soviet Soldier said:I was just pointing out which it could be possible. I don't really care if serious people care or dont give a jack about it. I just felt like sharing my view with other people.