I, for one, like the potential anonymity of the rep system, and see no reason to change it.
I generally sign it as 'mos' or my full user name, but in certain circumstances it's nice just to make a nice comment and leave it at that.
In particular, i've seen on other forums how the system can be 'abused' - for example, a clique of users who will tend to stick together on any subject, as a group, and whose members all seem to enjoy unusually high levels of reputation!
For me, if there's any question that the rep I give will be mis-read as anything other than a vote on quality regarding posts, then I will leave my name off.
If negative reputation were working at Jref, i'd be more concerned about the anonymity of that. While it's a great thing imho to give
good without your name, if you're prepared to speak negatively I think you should be prepared to justify yourself.
Also, I heard about a member here at Jref who received a negative comment attached to their positive reputation - can anyone shed any light on how that works?!! Lol, perhaps it's someone new to the system who doesn't understand what's what??
As for the Donators having access to who left rep, I think that's fair and no problem at all. Why shouldn't they have extra benefits when they're contributing so directly to the costs of the site?
cheers, mos
