In 2021, Donald Trump and Shinzo Abe gave speeches praising Unification Church in its event named Rally of Hope.[90][91][92][93] Unification Church has ties with Kishi Nobusuke, Abe's grandfather and former prime minister, and Abe Shintaro, Abe's father and former foreign minister.
Although the Japanese authorities and mainstream media still refuse to name the Unification Church (Moonies), all the new reporting on the killing of Shinzo Abe suggests that it wasn't about politics but Abe's promotion of the church. The shooter's mother went bankrupt donating to the Moonies, and he was angry.
The man who fatally shot former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has told police that he initially planned to attack a leader of a religious group that he believed caused his mother to become bankrupt through donations, investigative sources said Saturday. Tetsuya Yamagami, 41, also admitted that he intended to kill Abe, believing he had promoted the group in Japan, the sources said, without naming the group. The suspect had repeatedly visited locations where Abe had delivered campaign speeches ahead of Sunday's House of Councillors election.
At a press briefing on Saturday in Nara, Tomoaki Onizuka, head of the Nara prefectural police, acknowledged flaws in the protection that had been given to Mr. Abe. "It is undeniable that there were problems in the security," Mr. Onizuka said.
No. have you read ANY of this thread? Or this one?Can we believe Mr. Abe was killed due to this reason?
You're grasping at straws, and completely ignoring a mountain of evidence, including Yamagami's own confession that this murder was about his anger towards the Moonies. Literally no one but you has suggested that China had anything to do with it, so I wonder what you're doing here. Read the rest of this thread AND the one I linked above before you propose any more baseless theories.In an assassination, the detectors usually pose every type of theory to find the reason for the murder. I think Mr. Abe was a moderate politician and tended to have a better relationship, and friendship with his brother land, China. That was not a tolerable thing for oppositions with an extreme tendency.
On what evidence do you base your theory? Are you aware of any such political group that both wanted the former prime minister dead and had definite contact with and influence over the assassin? Provide some evidence or take this baseless nonsense elsewhere.However, it was a theory I expressed.
Nevertheless, I don't think killing the previous faultless prime minister of Japan was a personal emotion and violence. Probably, the stupid killer could be provoked by a political group, and they assigned him to do the crime with a religious motivation.
However, it was a theory I expressed.
Nevertheless, I don't think killing the previous faultless prime minister of Japan was a personal emotion and violence. Probably, the stupid killer could be provoked by a political group, and they assigned him to do the crime with a religious motivation.
Hi, nice gaijinOn what evidence do you base your theory? Are you aware of any such political group that both wanted the former prime minister dead and had definite contact with and influence over the assassin? Provide some evidence or take this baseless nonsense elsewhere.
Consider this your last warning; I have very little patience for baseless conspiracy theories, and I will NOT see this forum flooded with such specious claims. If you are just making stuff up because it seems plausible to you, I will give you a time out to think about what it means to participate in a grown-up conversation.
@Mansoor, with all due respect, Mr Abe was far from faultless. And far from moderate. His two tenures were marred by scandals, corruption, controversy, and political failure. Whenever things got untenable, he resigned, claiming health problems. His, his father's, and grandfather's collusion with the Unification Church sort of sealed his fate. Please read the threads @nice gaijin suggested. I am pretty sure his state funeral scheduled for September will be cancelled for whatever reason, simply because it's undeserved and out of place.
As others have pointed out, there is absolutely no evidence for your theory and neither have you given any justification why it could be true.It is a theory whether baseless or true. I didn't express it as a certain thing. I just commented on it as a probability. You can ignore it or think about it. It is the choice of readers to consider this theory or put it away.
@Mansoor, this is what you sound like:
"Some people liked this politician, but some people didn't... Based on this universal truth for every politician who has ever lived, I'm going to ignore everything that has been reported about this case and make up a whole conspiracy to assassinate him after he's out of power. Then when I get pushback, I'll wonder loudly why I'm being silenced for 'just asking questions.' Why won't you provide me with a platform to spout my baseless claims? Are you afraid of the truth?"
I apologize, for using the word "theory." Theories are based on empirical evidence; this is a carelessly specious musing at best. You have literally nothing upon which to base this idea; you're merely writing fanfiction for authoritarians. You contradict yourself from one sentence to the next, projecting your own impressions of these men despite the facts that you yourself admit. How does Abe "loving peace" translate to re-establishing Japan as a military superpower? What makes men who consolidate authoritarian power over their people humble, in any sense of the word? Many of the people who opposed his policies were against militarization; you think the ex-military guy with a personal grudge was groomed into building a homemade arsenal and assassinating a retired politician... by a bunch of peaceniks?
I'm not sure if you are even aware of how outrageously unrealistic that sounds. It's possible in the same sense that it's possible that my cat is the vanguard of an alien invasion, sent here to observe my behavior.
If I seem sensitive, it's because I'm highly allergic to BS, and I'm wary of bootlickers. I operate under the assumption that in a serious discussion we're all sharing our thoughts in good faith. My resistance to you spewing conspiracy theories onto this forum (a safe haven for thoughtful discussion) comes from seeing exactly what this kind of unchecked nonsense has done to social media and our public discourse. Substantiate your claims or prepare to get roasted for them.
You've paid your respects, I'd leave it at that.
Please, refer to my previous postMansoor - As you say, you have no evidence to offer your theory. In that case, you shouldn't post your theory. And a cursory read of Japanese history will tell you that it's been anything but peaceful. I'm sorry to be blunt, but you are showing your ignorance of Japan in your recent posts.
Personal vendetta may seem a trivial pretext to you, but not to the person with such a vendetta. As discussed in the original thread, the story as we understand it thus far is that this wasn't a matter of "religious conflict," but a personal grudge the assassin felt against Abe for his perceived relationship with a specific church (or cult, to be more accurate).I'm suspicious of the event that the highest character of Japan who served the Japanese people for many years is killed by a strayed villain based on a trivial pretext.
Nothing is in its place so that I can conclude that killing the most famous minister of Japan was due to a personal purpose or a simple religious conflict!
Also, the word "theory" you used is correct. The theory is a concept that has not been proven and there is not any evidence to prove it, yet.
Moreover; my expression was a question not a direct and overt opinion.
Can we believe Mr. Abe was killed due to this reason?
So, the answer could be one of these two words simply, yes OR no
A far more appropriate term for what you've posited is "conspiracy theory."theory
thē′ə-rē, thîr′ē
noun
A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena.The branch of a science or art consisting of its explanatory statements, accepted principles, and methods of analysis, as opposed to practice.A set of theorems that constitute a systematic view of a branch of mathematics.Abstract reasoning; speculation.A belief or principle that guides action or assists comprehension or judgment.- An assumption based on limited information or knowledge; a conjecture.
Contemplation.Perception or consideration of the relations of the parts of an ideal construction, which is supposed to render completely or in some measure intelligible a fact or thing which it resembles or to which it is analogous; also, the ideal construction itself.An intelligible conception or account of how something has been brought about or should be done.
conspiracy theory
noun
- A theory seeking to explain a disputed case or matter as a plot by a secret group or alliance rather than an individual or isolated act.
- A hypothesis alleging that the members of a coordinated group are, and/or were, secretly working together to commit illegal or wrongful actions including attempting to hide the existence of the group and its activities. In notable cases the hypothesis contradicts the mainstream explanation for historical or current events.
- Hypothetical speculation that is untrue or outlandish.
I heard a little about him in the news (I don't remember what was the subject). He was one who claimed something and then confessed (maybe by himself or under political pressure) that he did a mistake, but my considerable question was not an overt assertion.