- 15 Mar 2002
- 16,758
- 2,298
Elizabeth said:I basically agree that he needs to learn to take a little better what he dishes out so well....
I do the "take" of "give and take" equally as well as I do the "give", provided I am on equal footing. Clearly, this was not the case in my disagreement with RockLee as he held both the power and the inclination to ban me for the content of my opinion, and not for the wording of it, as I will elaborate on farther down in this post.
miki78 said:I have nothing Against Mike Cash even if he has been very rude to me in the past
Rude to you by commenting on the androgeny of a pair of Japanese musicians?
I suppose that blotted from your memory the identity of the one person (and a devout Atheist, at that) who went out of his way to dig up for you information on the Catholic church in Japan and ease your concerns about being able to continue actively in your faith should you ever come to live in Japan.
Acts of kindness apparently don't count for much with some people.
Pachipro said:If Mike had said that "he should be strapped to a gurney and be leathally injected"...
I am opposed to lethal injection as a means of capital punishment.
Elizabeth said:Mike had a chance to argue his point with as much nuance and depth as he thought appropriate....
In the face of an immediate deletion, a threatened ban, and an irrational and baseless ad hominem attack from a moderator? Not likely.
dulac said:It was one of those strange cases where I agreed with someone I generally don't like and think is an overblown hothead who got his forum status without much merit, and disagreed with the others.
You would prefer that we all stick our fingers in the wind and not disagree with each other? Maybe you like pablum, but I gave it up after teething.
Pachipro said:Also, Mike was very helpful to newbies when they had a question. He always posted a link or offered some advice to those seriously looking for answers.
I am unspeakably glad that someone actually noticed that aspect of my participation here. To hear some tell it, all I ever do is look a place to sh*t and a stick to stir it with.
RockLee said:He posted this : "The man should be stood up against a wall and shot."
In the interest of fair play, I demand that you receive an infraction for posting that.
My infraction was ostensibly for "inappropriate language". If it was inappropriate language when I posted it, then it is inappropriate language when you repost it, as you have done at least twice to my knowledge.
Since you think it alright to repost it, then quite obviously it was not "inappropriate language" but "inappropriate opinion" which led to the infraction (which management has since removed).
In the realm of public debate, nothing arouses my scorn faster than unprincipled duplicitousness, especially on the part of those placed in positions of authority. A position from which, in my opinion, you ought to be removed.
I pride myself on the wording of my posts being precise, concise, and succinct. Given the same situation over again, I would make exactly the same post.miki78 said:I think Mike Cash really just worded his opinion wrong
Elizabeth said:...to call the person that is trying to tell you something 'stupid' or an 'idiot', which Mike is so renowned for here. A few examples would help a lot....
Yes, they would. How about a few examples of me calling anyone "stupid" or an "idiot" for starters.
Elizabeth said:I was wondering what a watered down alternative would be as well "He should be shot." It's an everyday interjection. And nothing specifically about a bullet to the brain.
I said nothing about a bullet to the brain. Traditionally firing squads aim at the heart.
Elizabeth said:Personally I think it comes mostly from Rocklee's very intense objection to the war in Iraq which this guy was also hoping to evade. If Mike had said the person responsible for the invasion or some nameless terrorist for keeping us in it should be shot I doubt very much it would have gotten this far.
Absolutely it stemmed from his hatred of Bush and his intense objection to the war in Iraq....neither of which had any bearing whatsoever on my opinion, which would be precisely the same no matter what person or party is in power and no matter the location, nature, or popular support of the conflict.
I suspect that had I said Bush ought to be stood against a wall and shot RockLee would have leapt in and applauded me.
miki78 said:Did you know only one bullet is real so they don't know who fired the shot that kills
Everybody here seems to unquestioningly accept this mistaken bit of information as gospel for some reason. Actually, the typical protocol is for only one of the bullets to be a blank, so that each of the shooters can console himself with the thought that perhaps his shot didn't actually do anything.
Relying on a single projectile to effectively do the job in a reasonably swift, sure, and humane manner flies in the face of logic, which makes it all that much harder to believe how everyone here seems to so readily swallow this chestnut.