The first point I agree with, though it's unrelated to whether or not the Queen did her job well. Most republicans recognise that she did what she was expected to do as a Queen well even if they strongly opposed the existence of her role. I also think you have to give credit to someone who was working (and having to deal with a succession of increasingly awful prime ministers!) up to two days of her death at the age of 96.Where is this exemplary service- where she awarded the Royal Family millions of dollars and wrote provisions into legislation to ensure everything benefits the Royal Family and the tyrannical control of the family. The main people who care about her passing are the media as they are losing an easy show.
I like the way you turned the state funerals into a football result!Number of state-funeral-related self-immolations:
Abe (1) : Queen (0)
Clearly, Abe's the winner. His score would probably be higher if we compared them based on corruption or divisiveness.
Anyhow, one LDP member, Murakami Seiichiro, a former Cabinet member and Abe critic, came forward and chastised his fellow LDP lawmakers for remaining silent on the issue.
I assume he's got nothing to lose politically, but it shows that there's simmering dissent even within LDP ranks.
"Mr. Kishida's support rate is dropping, but support for the opposition parties hasn't gone up," he said. "The public is upset. They're uncertain. I guess they're just at a loss for what to do." Protest organizers said they held out hope that the public would be galvanized. Nahoko Hishiyama, 33, an organizer of the large protest in Yoyogi Park and secretary general of a grass-roots organization that opposes a proposal by Mr. Abe to revise the pacifist Constitution, said activists could target city and prefectural elections to put pressure on the national government. "The Japanese," she said, "need to think of themselves as people who, if they raise their voices, can change things."
The State funeral is good for 3 reasons. First, it keeps the discussion on matters Japanese need to be talking about; religion and politics. Next, Abe is well - respected internationally. Final reason is that many loved him, but that does not get mentioned in the news. The Queen of England committed atrocities for centuries, but then she / them claim they paid their victims back for it! Arrogance. Even she was afforded a funeral fit for a Queen, Abe is just as deserving, if not more.I decided to open a new thread on the topic, as the coming weeks will bring more discussion and protests.
Yesterday, 4,000 people gathered around the Diet building in Tokyo and - wow - some local media reported it.
It's great to see young and old united in their criticism. Their arguments - inconsistent policies, waste of taxes in the light of the pandemic - will be particularly hard to refute (see below).
Meanwhile, PM Kishida pledged to 'squarely' respond to state funeral criticism. Let's see if he can square the circle.
Nothing wrong with this stance. Historical revisionism is what every country has a history of doing. Most of the Japanese population are historical revisionist and conservative. Hone and tatamae. Try reading about the good in Abe instead of all the negative. This is stuff you pulled off Wikipedia looks like.His hawkish, nationalist stance and attempts at historical revisionism alienated him from most of the Japanese population.
Deserving? Hardly.
Nothing wrong with this stance. Historical revisionism is what every country has a history of doing. Most of the Japanese population are historical revisionist and conservative. Hone and tatamae. Try reading about the good in Abe instead of all the negative. This is stuff you pulled off Wikipedia looks like.
Again, no different than any other country and its leaders. Abe san did the right thing for his country by not asserting his presence in the international community and standing up for his people at home.Let's face it: Japan has never been good at dealing with its past. If historical revisionism means further whitewashing and ignoring, I see no merit in it. The points above were "pulled off" last week's newspaper articles (Japan Times, Asahi, Mainichi, and even if it came off Wikipedia, it would still hold true).
Feel free to post more about the "good".
Wrong historical context by whose standard? Japanese parents do not and should not teach Western revisionist history to their children much like Anglo Saxon parenting teaches their own children to deny the consequences of slavery and reparations.I guess if it were customary in Japan to hold state funerals for all former PMs, no one would mind Abe's service tomorrow. If I remember correctly, only one Japanese PM had a state funeral post-WWII, and he'd received the Nobel Peace Prize. So elevating Abe to such heights seems to send the wrong signal in the historical context of post-war Japan. However, as you mentioned above, the importance of publicly discussing the role of politics and religion in Japan cannot be overstated.
What? @thomas is talking about Japanese revisionist history, not "Western". He was trying to deny things happened that clearly happened and those were things about Japan. This wasn't some "Western" influence trying to get Japanese people to believe something.Wrong historical context by whose standard? Japanese parents do not and should not teach Western revisionist history to their children much like Anglo Saxon parenting teaches their own children to deny the consequences of slavery and reparations.
It is a reinterpretation by Western Academics to decide what Japanese should recognize as correct history.What? @thomas is talking about Japanese revisionist history, not "Western". He was trying to deny things happened that clearly happened and those were things about Japan. This wasn't some "Western" influence trying to get Japanese people to believe something.
It would also make sense if it follows tradition even if the majority didn't want it. But this goes against all tradition for former prime ministers.The key point of having a state funeral is that it recognises the feelings of the majority of the people in the state. Regardless of the historical crimes of Imperial Britain (which I'm not arguing with you against), the Queen was admired or at least respected by the majority of British people and considered to have devoted herself to public service in a way that the transparently self-serving Abe didn't. Abe does not have that majority respect, as opinion polls show. This event has been foisted on an unwilling Japanese public with no consultation. It's very revealing that NHK is now stressing the "funeral diplomacy" aspect, a tacit admission that the memorial itself is of little value.
Then how is it possible for Mr. Abe to be elected as the longest serving prime minister in Japanese history then? Are you alluding that the elections were rigged? This is the culture of Japan . They are fake. They vote for Mr. Abe in private then scorn him in public just like the Moritomo scandal. How many people were involved in the approval process, and who contributed to this building of this school? Surely Mrs. Abe did not force the construction of an Emperor centered school on the general public, did she?The key point of having a state funeral is that it recognises the feelings of the majority of the people in the state. Regardless of the historical crimes of Imperial Britain (which I'm not arguing with you against), the Queen was admired or at least respected by the majority of British people and considered to have devoted herself to public service in a way that the transparently self-serving Abe didn't. Abe does not have that majority respect, as opinion polls show. This event has been foisted on an unwilling Japanese public with no consultation. It's very revealing that NHK is now stressing the "funeral diplomacy" aspect, a tacit admission that the memorial itself is of little value.
It is because over the last 10 years professors with relativist thought were dismissed from tenure. Kansai University dismissed a professor who had supported non-Western views on WW2. Most Japanese historiologist do not teach critical history anyway for fear of backlash.This has nothing to do with Western or Eastern interpretation. In fact, a lot of Japanese historiology is highly critical of Japan's role in WWII. Neither the Japanese population nor the academia supported Abe's revisionist views.
And Abe's legacy, too, has nothing to do with interpretation or cultural relativism: the Japanese moral concept does not differ from "Western" concepts: corruption and lies are still wrong and undeserving of public veneration.
I've said everything I want to say about the subject - even thinking about Abe is something I find distasteful and I'll be avoiding the TV tomorrow - so I'll bow out of this thread. Good day to you.
One measure of greatness as a leader is how long they remain in power- obviously true. It has always implied greatness even in Africa. It is the pitiful nature of humans to keep infamous leaders in power. Asking opinions on politics from most Japanese is practically meaningless because they complain about every PM and know very little about geopolitics, even the educated ones. I am sorry Mr. Abe leaves a bitter taste for you, nevertheless, a great leader he is and will be remembered that way. Tune in to the telly tomorrow.Tokyo Guy - you know the answer to the first question yourself. The LDP is a nest of vipers consisting of different factions that are far more interested in their power games than in running the country - leadership elections are the only time you see any animation from the LDP. The fact that nobody in the LDP felt it was the right time to challenge Abe for eight years does not make him a great leader. And longevity does not imply greatness - plenty of African leaders have been in power for decades and plundered their country. My own country is currently suffering the effects of 12 years of sociopathic Conservative government. In contrast, Nelson Mandela insisted from the outset that he would not serve more than two terms. That's greatness for you.
Regarding winning elections, being voted by about 25-30% of eligible voters is a country each time (about half of the 50% or so who bother to vote) is also not an indication of greatness.
I won't reply to your other questions, as I did not at any point imply that the elections were rigged, I have no idea how many people were involved in the approval process of Moritomo Gakuen or why you asked, and I don't understand the last question.
I've said everything I want to say about the subject - even thinking about Abe is somethingLeader I find distasteful and I'll be avoiding the TV tomorrow - so I'll bow out of this thread. Good day to you.
One measure of greatness as a leader is how long they remain in power- obviously true. It has always implied greatness even in Africa. It is the pitiful nature of humans to keep infamous leaders in power. Asking opinions on politics from most Japanese is practically meaningless because they complain about every PM and know very little about geopolitics, even the educated ones. I am sorry Mr. Abe leaves a bitter taste for you, nevertheless, a great leader he is and will be remembered that way. Tune in to the telly tomorrow.
Is there an article on this in Japanese somewhere? My wife said she hadn't heard about it even though she has the TV on constantly.Today, in the early morning, a man in his 70s set himself on fire near the prime minister's office in Tokyo's Chiyoda Ward to protest the planned state funeral for former PM Abe. He survived with severe burns on his entire body.
Obama won the Nobel Prize for Peace and Times Man of the Year, what has he accomplished? The irony ... My point is that I can make a list just as long of worthless American leaders who accomplished nothing, yet were accorded honor inspite of the facts. Are we really questioning Mr. Abe meaning and accomplishments in Japan to justify not according a State level funeral. He died in service to his party and country. You are arguing this here?Today, PM Kishida defended Mr Abe's state funeral, stating it was "appropriate" given the former's "achievements. He did not mention which achievements he was referring to apart from being the longest-serving PM. "I humbly accept the criticism that my explanation was insufficient," Kishida told members of parliament in response to questions about the issue.
Kishida defends state funeral for Abe as 'appropriate' during parliamentary debate
Some opposition parties have criticized Abe's nationalistic views, with the Japanese Communist Party saying it will boycott the state funeral, claiming it is unconstitutional.www.japantimes.co.jp
Honestly, there is nothing to explain except why there was no public debate before the decision to hold a state funeral and why the taxpayers, most of whom oppose the funeral, have to foot the bill!
Interestingly, Japan faced a similar situation in 1975, when the state funeral of PM Eisaku Sato, the longest-serving PM until then and a Nobel Peace Prize winner no less, was cancelled for legal concerns.
Such concerns do not seem relevant in 2022, despite the lack of actual achievements.