流れは「れ」の送り仮名があった方がいいでは?→ 戦後の一時期、流(ながれ)が13にまで増えたこともありましたが、
...の七つです。
金沢の日本語学校で2週間ほぼホームステイして通った. or something similar is also no problem, right ? Even though the homestay is presumably through, not at, the school itself.I agree with @pipokun that it should be 流派 (ryuha) or グループ . Also, a more detailed description he suggests is necessary, unless you are making your speech with photos.
I think で is OK with ホームステイ because it refers simply to geographical location. 留学 implicitly suggests a "destination or target," so に is used. I think the difference lies in that "homestay" is more like a "visit" while "ryugaku" suggests effort and goal to be achieved.
金沢の日本語学校で2週間ほぼホームステイして通った. or something similar is also no problem, right ? Even though the homestay is presumably through, not at, the school itself.
に留学する。is confusing because する is usually translated as "will go" to X place on a study abroad program or go to study YZ or whatever.
金沢で2週間ホームステイして日本語学校に通った。
There are two locations mentioned in this one sentence (kanazawa and Japanese language school) for two different verbs (to do homestay and to go), so it will be less confusing if you put the related items closer (kanazawa & do homestay, school and go).
That is why is sounded awkward. It's only the people that already knew my situation that are welcome to understand.
Yes, any broader wording to include a specifically "to go" verb would also need to take に。アメリカ留学に出かける ? アメリカに行って留学する etc. Neither of which perhaps makes a more meaningful use of the language for native speakers.~で留学する sounds odd perhaps because 留学する implies first you go abroad then study there. So the location is more like a destination than a venue.
「+"To go and do" という英訳は、確かに論理的な訳ではない」と言いたかっただけです。As far as I know it's just アメリカに留学する. There's no adding (more) verbs of motion, as 留学する is one in itself.
Probably not with 行く, although there are cases of other combinations such as 留学に出かける。 My "complaint" is more with the generous English translations that allow for being able to say "going to America on a study abroad program" etc all derived from アメリカに留学する alone. It should ideally follow the same pattern of に旅行する・に行く (to take a trip OR go on a trip but not both simultaneously.I don't think so, because from what I've been told "place"に/へ留学に行く doesn't exist. But we'll have to wait for a native speaker to confirm this.
「流」よりも「流派」、もしくはグループの方が、一般的な言い方だと思います。
山笠の場合、「流」は「流派」ではないんです。
豊臣秀吉が博多の町を復興させた太閤町割の区画のことを言います。
「留学に出かける」などを使う場合もあると思うけど。。。
へぇボタン100万回です。ありがとうございました。山笠の場合、「流」は「流派」ではないんです。
豊臣秀吉が博多の町を復興させた太閤町割の区画のこと を言います。
どうもありがとう、Undrentideさん、Epigene さん、! I thought に出かける might be idiomatic ("going out into an overseas study experience") or relatively new into the language since I've rarely come across it. And when I have it was in the context of the verb in relative clause such as 留学に出かける学生が多いAlthough you can get the meaning across, "dekakeru" already suggests travel, making the verb redundant.
In the case of "place"に/へ留学に行く, "iku" is also redundant. However, I'd say that this is more tolerated and accepted in colloquial speech, while 留学に出かける is clearly awkward.