I understood what you meant. Sorry that my reply was really ambiguous. Please forget about it.I said "That also can mean".
Well, kind of..."nowhere near" is an exaggeration. All the girls with the chokers are inside the school and the speaker is somewhere on the school grounds. The speaker and her friends were thinking how they should proceed to stop the bad guys that have put chokers on some of the girls in that school.The speaker says 首輪を外して行きましょー nevertheless they are nowhere near someone with a collar?
この can't refer to the speaker themselves in that sentence, so it can't mean 私の他にも. (私たちの他にも is possible, though.)I'm not sure...was what I wrote correct or not?
Because what ここの他に人がいる is meant is unsure in the first place (therefore it sounds awkward).ここの他にも人がいる。(=ここ以外のところにも人がいる。)(=ここに人がいて 他のところにも人がいる)
ここの他に人がいる。I am really unsure of this. Is this equivalent to [ここ以外のところに人がいる]/[ここに人がないけど、他のところに人がいる?] (because I always thought that this one is similar to the first example.)
These are the same in meaning, but the latter sounds a bit awkward when used at the sentence end. There is no problem as a modifying clause or a quotation (e.g. この人たちの他に人がいるはずはない, この人たちの他に人がいるとは思えない).この人たちの他にも人がいる。
この人たちの他に人がいる。
The latter means that the number of people beside here is larger than the number of people here.他にももっといそうな感じなのです
他にもっといそうな感じなのです
他にももっといそうな感じなのです
他にもっといそうな感じなのです
The latter means that the number of people beside here is larger than the number of people here.
But I have no idea how to think of Nの他に. I know you said that in those cases, they are the same in meaning, but is this true no matter the context?この人たちの他にも人がいる。
この人たちの他に人がいる。
外/他(ほか)の意味 - goo国語辞書ほか【外/他】
1 その場所以外の所。よそ。他所。「どこか―を探す」「―へ行く」
No, no. I just added 他のところ to make the sentence look more familiar to me. I understand that 他 can refer to absolutely anything.他 doesn't refer to 他のところ.
なぜドイツ人はドイツ語の他に英語を完璧に喋れるんですか?
なぜドイツ人はドイツ語の他にも英語を完璧に喋れるんですか?
I don't think so.I must say that I find this quite strange.
Think of examples yourself and give it to us.What if it were 他には and 他にも. Would there still be no difference?
In the 他にも case, I understood this fact it a bit harder because も means "also" there, unlike in こんなにも or よりも. I expected a much greater difference from that kind of も.
Hint2:What if it were 他には and 他にも. Would there still be no difference?
This is not always valid.Aの他に already includes A.
Hint2:
This is not always valid.
Why? This is quite a longshot but, is it because I am using a potential verb?If you want to use 自由にすべて決められる in the main clause, 他に can't be used in the first place.
でもその他のことは、すべて自由に決められる。
But if those two really were the only two things that we couldn't decide, then the sentence would be wrong, right?でも人生には自分で決められる大切なことがその他にもたくさんある。 is still valid even when と is used there, since we know things we can't decide by ourselves is not just those two as a common sense.