This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

とかからない and もかからない

raikado

先輩
Joined
29 Oct 2012
Messages
523
Reaction score
21
Hello,

I have a question regarding the following usage of と.
と[格助接助並助]の意味 - 国語辞書 - goo辞書

And one more example sentence : 5分と走らないうちに息切れしてしまった。>>> "I had not run five minutes when I got out of breath."

Does replacing も with と in these 3 examples (2 from the dictionary) change anything?
 
I think も sounds stronger here, i.e., it would put more emphasis on the amount. I guess if you want to get technical, you could say that -something- in the sentences doesn't reach or go over the number/amount attached to this と (as stated in the dictionary with 以上, also までも(ない)), while も emphasizes that amount. I didn't run into this と a whole lot, though. There are examples on alc with も similar to the example your wrote that are similar - 分も ないの英訳|英辞郎 on the WEB:アルク especially this one - 「帰宅後5分もしないうちに、彼が玄関先に現れた。」.

If I'm wrong about this, someone please correct me.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your answer. I don't know about と, but about までも, doesn't it emphasize just as much as も? In the two examples from the dictionary, they seem interchangeable.
全部で一〇〇円までもかからない = 全部で一〇〇円もかからない
一〇〇キロまでも走らなかった = 一〇〇キロも走らなかった
Though I don't think they are interchangeable in the last example. 5分までも走らないうちに息切れしてしまった sounds wrong due to 5分までも走る.
 
I don't think it is quite so much s matter of emphasis as it is of showing that something is different from (less than) what one might expect.
 
@Mike Cash You are reffering just to と, right? And not to what I wrote about も and までも.
 
More to も
 
5分までも走る is invalid since 5分まで走る is invalid, too.
As for と vs も, yes, they are interchangeable and the meaning is the same. と sounds a bit classical or written-word-like, I think.
 
I don't think it is quite so much s matter of emphasis as it is of showing that something is different from (less than) what one might expect.
Reading your answer more carefully I see now what you meant. My idea of も was the same though. I said only "emphasis" but I actually meant "emphasis on the fact that the speaker thinks the amount should be at least a certain value but it doesn't even amount to that".

Thank you for clarifying it, Toritoribe!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…