- 14 Dec 2013
- 277
- 16
I have 2 questions:
1. 「このレポートはあとけつろんをかくばかりだ。」= The only thing left to do with this report is to write a conclusion. (from DBJG) I don't get the meaning of あと in this sentence.
2. 「この10年で初めての殺人事件以来、地元の住民は不安な緊張状態にある。」「自分は外国人として社内で独特の立場にあることを承知している。」「もっと良い状況にある人」and so on. (taken from alc)
While these sentences make sense to me just fine, the ある here has been bothering be for a bit. I'm wondering if this is the same "X(animate) Yにいる" meaning " X exists/is in Y". If it is that same "existence of animate objects" thing, then why is ある used instead or いる. Or it's something totally different and にある is not connected to the subject (地元の住民 and 自分 in the first examples) at all. From what I can tell, it seems to be used mainly for abstract meanings, like states, positions, etc.
There are some いる examples as well : 「私は考えられる中で最悪の状態にいる。」「私は自分が実際に誰かの人生を変えることができるという立場にいる。」The meaning appears to be the same as the sentences with ある (be in...), but there was very few examples on alc in comparison. I can't see why both are viable and ある is used more. I probably have the wrong idea about it.
Any explanations for these questions would be appreciated.
1. 「このレポートはあとけつろんをかくばかりだ。」= The only thing left to do with this report is to write a conclusion. (from DBJG) I don't get the meaning of あと in this sentence.
2. 「この10年で初めての殺人事件以来、地元の住民は不安な緊張状態にある。」「自分は外国人として社内で独特の立場にあることを承知している。」「もっと良い状況にある人」and so on. (taken from alc)
While these sentences make sense to me just fine, the ある here has been bothering be for a bit. I'm wondering if this is the same "X(animate) Yにいる" meaning " X exists/is in Y". If it is that same "existence of animate objects" thing, then why is ある used instead or いる. Or it's something totally different and にある is not connected to the subject (地元の住民 and 自分 in the first examples) at all. From what I can tell, it seems to be used mainly for abstract meanings, like states, positions, etc.
There are some いる examples as well : 「私は考えられる中で最悪の状態にいる。」「私は自分が実際に誰かの人生を変えることができるという立場にいる。」The meaning appears to be the same as the sentences with ある (be in...), but there was very few examples on alc in comparison. I can't see why both are viable and ある is used more. I probably have the wrong idea about it.
Any explanations for these questions would be appreciated.