Centuries
後輩
- 12 Mar 2017
- 76
- 47
I'd like to add some thoughts:
I've seen this guy's paper referenced often and many people point to it -- in fact, I've seen so many other people copy the structure in their research plans, especially the timetable, and I have to ask myself...how much should one really look at this guys paper? He submitted it in 2007, that's 10 years ago. Did anyone here base their research plan structure on Lars' paper?
I think it is shared a lot because frankly it is one of the best out there. It's well-formatted, written, and articulated. The timeline is so crucial to a research proposal and yet many people omit it.
It's a good reference, but by no means should anyone copy a proposal - but they do anyway. That is why I am wary to post my own, because people do copy and fill in with their own stuff. I took some guidance form Lars' proposal but expanded in the timetable to be more specific and include more concrete dates and scheduling. I also took guidance from academic research proposals not specific to MEXT.
Consider it a reference, not a template.