Tried to buy v. Tried buyiing ?

Elizabeth

先輩
Joined
22 Apr 2003
Messages
9,839
Reaction score
135
This can be tricky. Do English textbooks in Japanese generally teach there is no difference between these two forms ?

It may apply to other verbs as well, but "Tried buying" and "tried to buy" was just one example that came out after talking with a friend last night....Strictly in terms of meaning, the expressions carry basically the same message. In terms of standard usage, however, in my mind there would be a very subtle distinction. Anyone care to reason it out ? 😌
 
wouldn't it be like the difference between 買おうとした and 買ってみた?

Seems like "Tried to buy" indicates an attempt at the act of purchasing, which probably led to failure. "Tried buying" sounds more like it wasn't the act of purchasing, but the outcome was unknown at the time of purchase.
 
wouldn't it be like the difference between 窶敞停?堋ィ窶堋、窶堙??堋オ窶堋ス and 窶敞停?堙≫?堙??堙昶?堋ス?

Seems like "Tried to buy" indicates an attempt at the act of purchasing, which probably led to failure. "Tried buying" sounds more like it wasn't the act of purchasing, but the outcome was unknown at the time of purchase.
Oh, that's interesting. 👍 "Tried buying" to me could be a failed purchase or item that didn't "work out" as intended. It also sounds less formal than "to buy" (to buy =more like tried "to purchase" ??)
 
This can be tricky. Do English textbooks in Japanese generally teach there is no difference between these two forms ?
It may apply to other verbs as well, but "Tried buying" and "tried to buy" was just one example that came out after talking with a friend last night....Strictly in terms of meaning, the expressions carry basically the same message. In terms of standard usage, however, in my mind there would be a very subtle distinction. Anyone care to reason it out ? 😌

Yes, it is a very interesting and significant issue considering how often we use them, Elizabeth!!

Much obliged for your mentioning this enigma because the issue must be one of the things that impedes my brain from working at descent speed when I am using English!!: you know how it is when we begin to learn our secondary language, or tertiary for people who are bilingual, our mind working so sluggishly without old and familiar language facilities.


This can be tricky. Do English textbooks in Japanese generally teach there is no difference between these two forms ?

As to Japanese English texts: They do not mention the differenceI believe. I surely have not read all of them, and maybe it is just that I did not find good one, but they generally have their descriptions copied off some other texts and the arguments for the conclusions are often rather drastically so well trimmed that we often can't see any sense.
I moan to think of the unimaginable hours and efforts of middle and high school students wasted.



Anyway, I can only guess here from general patters and similarity of gerund to present continuous form of a verb:generally in any language similar things have similar effects and meanings, or at least I wish them to be so.

Verbs with suffix "-ing", gerund form of a verb:
Gerund - Wikipedia
The suffix "-ing "is also used for forming present continuous form of a verb, and "present continuous tense" is used to describe on-going dynamic state in comparison to "present tense" describing a static state.

So I reckon gerunds may have somehow vivid flavour or nuance with them that emphasises the process over the entire event or results.

With to-infinitive:
They are wrong to use animals for.... ==>Statement without any particular stress on time, thus might implies that the statement should hold in all times generally. May sound slightly more objective than the below?

With gerund:
They are wrong using animals for... ==>More pending, and emphasis is on their using animals for something at present rather than the past or future. Maybe sound slightly more emotional compared to the above?

But if things are this simple, then text books should have this. I believe there is a lot more to this.:eek:
Maybe there are groups of gerunds too.

So did I guess it right or I guess it utterly wrong?

If anyone can suggests the difference of gerunds and to-infinitives and reasoning, that would be nice. 🙂
 
Last edited:
With gerund:
They are wrong using animals for... ==>More pending, and emphasis is on their using animals for something at present rather than the past or future. Maybe sound slightly more emotional compared to the above?
This isn't really funny or unclear per se, but still slightly odd in tone. I can't explain all the rules with their ins and outs for using gerund form of the verb and give examples to each one. But in many situations, the gerand seems more vivid, more emotionally urgent or immediate ("in progress") and tends to be used more either by the people actually doing the action or directed at the behavior itself. And in this particular instance, the wrongness of the perpetrators is of secondary concern to the impact on the animals. Presumably.


So now to my suggestion for a superior sentence: "It is wrong using animals for research" or "Using animals for research is wrong."
 
"Tried buying" sounds like it's from a TV commercial:

Cheery commercial actor said:
We tried buying the other brand but it just wasn't good enough.

And I agree with Nice Gaijin's assessment of their distinction.
 
Buying is definiitely more colloquial, but they both seem extremely natural to me in any of the three phases in virtually any circumstance.


Purchase consideration :

Have you ever tried buying/to buy fresh flowers online?


Purchase attempt :

I tried buying/to buy fresh flowers online, but the floral company didn't accept my credit card.


Purchase failure :

I tried buying/to buy fresh flowers online, but they arrived wilted and withered.
 
Elizabeth said:
So now to my suggestion for a superior sentence: "It is wrong using animals for research" or "Using animals for research is wrong."

Thank you for your suggestion.

I've been trying to guess the reason that "they are wrong using" should not be avoided is because having subject.

And I came to this possibility:
Having "they" as a subject of sentence marks the word as a topic and introducing word "using" afterwards hits the possibility that the true topic is an action of using rather then certain group of people. Thus, using the two at once in the given context can be contradictory?

In other words, maybe it is for disambiguation? Like having multiple topics in single paragraph can be pretty confusing and thus bad?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Buying is definiitely more colloquial, but they both seem extremely natural to me in any of the three phases in virtually any circumstance.


Purchase consideration :

Have you ever tried buying/to buy fresh flowers online?


Purchase attempt :

I tried buying/to buy fresh flowers online, but the floral company didn't accept my credit card.


Purchase failure :

I tried buying/to buy fresh flowers online, but they arrived wilted and withered.

Hmm, interesting that opinions seem to vary even among native speakers. Maybe there are slight regional differences.

Anyway I just came across something that might be related:

anxious to be of help/of use
anxious to be helpful/useful

Maybe I'm completely off the point from the discussion of the-difference-between-gerunds-and-to-infinitive.

But somehow I feel "anxious to be of help" seems to have the focus on the act of helping as opposed to "anxious to be helpful" having slightly more stress on contributing for the completion or process: that I feel somewhat relative to the issue being discussed?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


助けになりたい
助けたい
助けていたい

Of cause these Japanese expressions do not simply map with English expressions as they are strictly different but do you believe there are some common elements?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


wouldn't it be like the difference between 買おうとした and 買ってみた?

Seems like "Tried to buy" indicates an attempt at the act of purchasing, which probably led to failure. "Tried buying" sounds more like it wasn't the act of purchasing, but the outcome was unknown at the time of purchase.

"買おうとした and 買ってみた?" There are cavernous difference between "した" and "みた" in some context. The former is indeed "tried buying" but the later sounds like"have bought and saw what it does or how it is?".
It is related to he role of te from of verb I think. I wrote something about it yesterday:
I am happy to speak with you

For statements like 「山にのぼってみたが、頂上にはたどり着かなかった」 and 「山に登ろうとしたが、頂上にはたどり着かなかった」, what you have pointed out is exactly right. Strictly speaking there can be difference but not like anyone actually cares generally anyway.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your suggestion.

I've been trying to guess the reason that "they are wrong using" should not be avoided is because having subject.

And I came to this possibility:
Having "they" as a subject of sentence marks the word as a topic and introducing word "using" afterwards hits the possibility that the true topic is an action of using rather then certain group of people. Thus, using the two at once in the given context can be contradictory?

In other words, maybe it is for disambiguation? Like having multiple topics in single paragraph can be pretty confusing and thus bad?
Are "they" the target of wrong or is using animals wrong ? Likewise, inserting imaginary preambles to this sentence, are they using animals to show they are wrong ? Or is the speaker ? 😌

"They are wrong for using animals as..."is OK also with the prepositional phrase playing a clarifying role in everyday speech, but "~ing" is colloquial with the emotion or immediacy that comes with that and it simply can't be dressed up as acceptable to be anything other than lazy and thoughtless for many people. :eek:
 
As far as the original question regarding "try to buy" vs. "try buying" is concerned, I agree with what Nice Gaijin has suggestedツ ツ(窶敞停?堋ィ窶堋、窶堙??堋キ窶堙ゥ / 窶敞停?堙≫?堙??堙昶?堙ゥツ).

For example,

You had seen a TV ad for this great new brand of laundry detergent and decided to give it a try.

"I tried to buy the new brand but it was sold out."

"I tried buying the new brand for a while but it doesn't get the really tough stains out like they say in the ads and it was not worth the higher price."

In the first sentence, "try" in conjunction with "to + infinitive", means to put in an effort, or 窶禿壺?廬ツ(ツ静エツ催懌?堙ー窶敞停?堋、窶堋ア窶堙?)窶堙嫁津シ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堙??忤窶氾坂?堋キ窶堙ゥツ、while in the second, the same verb "try" means something different. It means to sample, to see how it isツ、or ナスナス窶堋キ as in "try on a pair of jeans". So, what exactly did you ナスナス窶堋キツ?ツ Buying (and using) the detergent.

Another example.

"Try to be here on time next week, OK? ツ We can't start the show without the drummer."
窶藩?週窶堙最塚??堙溪?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堋スナスナセナ?テ披?堙俄? ??堙ゥ窶堙ヲ窶堋、窶堙俄?堋オ窶堙??堙ヲ窶堙仰、窶堋「窶堋「ツ?ツ ニ檀ニ停?ーニ筑ツー窶堋ェ窶堋「窶堙遺?堋ュ窶堋ソ窶堙。ニ歎ニ停?。ツー窶堋ェナスn窶堙溪?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙遺?堋「窶堙個。ツ ツ(ナ塚??堙溪?堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堋スナスナセナ?テ披?堙俄?堙坂?堋ア窶堋ア窶堙閏B]窶藩??堙ゥ窶堙ヲ窶堋、窶堙俄?忤窶氾坂?堋キ窶堙ゥ[/B]ツ)

"If you don't want the rest of the band being mad at you, why don't you try being here on time for once?"
ニ弛ニ停?愴檀窶堙娯?堙昶?堙ア窶堙遺?堙俄?悳窶堙ァ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ窶堙娯?堋ェツ(窶堙昶?堙ア窶堙遺?堋ェ窶悳窶堙≫?堙??堋「窶堙ゥ窶堙娯?堋ェツ)窶堋「窶堙「窶堙遺?堙ァ窶堋ウツ、ヒ?ェ窶忸ナスナセナ?テ披?凖岩?堙ィ窶堙俄?藩??堙??堙昶?堋ス窶堙ァツ?ツ ツ(ヒ?ェ窶忸ナスナス窶堋オ窶堙嫁スナセナ?テ披?凖骸B]窶堙ィ窶堙俄?藩??堙??堙昶?堙ゥ[/B]ツ)

I am sure there are variables but basically, that is how I would make the distinction between the two in this particular case of "try to ツ〜 / try ツ〜ing".ツ
 
As far as the original question regarding "try to buy" vs. "try buying" is concerned, I agree with what Nice Gaijin has suggestedツ ツ(窶敞停?堋ィ窶堋、窶堙??堋キ窶堙ゥ / 窶敞停?堙≫?堙??堙昶?堙ゥツ).
For example,
You had seen a TV ad for this great new brand of laundry detergent and decided to give it a try.
"I tried to buy the new brand but it was sold out."
"I tried buying the new brand for a while but it doesn't get the really tough stains out like they say in the ads and it was not worth the higher price."
In the first sentence, "try" in conjunction with "to + infinitive", means to put in an effort, or 窶禿壺?廬ツ(ツ静エツ催懌?堙ー窶敞停?堋、窶堋ア窶堙?)窶堙嫁津シ窶堋ゥ窶堙≫?堙??忤窶氾坂?堋キ窶堙ゥツ、while in the second, the same verb "try" means something different. It means to sample, to see how it isツ、or ナスナス窶堋キ as in "try on a pair of jeans". So, what exactly did you ナスナス窶堋キツ?ツ Buying (and using) the detergent.
It may work as a textbook explanation, but, at least from my experience, it is so common to hear them interchangable in real speech the distinction is all but completely dilluted. The only exception where a speaker might catch themselves would be using "to buy" for a purchase that was made and didn't work out....I'll just have to scratch my head a little and come up with a better example.
 
Hmm, interesting that opinions seem to vary even among native speakers. Maybe there are slight regional differences.

Anyway I just came across something that might be related:

anxious to be of help/of use
anxious to be helpful/useful

Maybe I'm completely off the point from the discussion of the-difference-between-gerunds-and-to-infinitive.

But somehow I feel "anxious to be of help" seems to have the focus on the act of helping as opposed to "anxious to be helpful" having slightly more stress on contributing for the completion or process: that I feel somewhat relative to the issue being discussed?

"Anxious to be helpful" at a trait level shows focus on the relief of "anxiety" through helping behavior and subtly away from the altruistic benefits of "helpfulness"/"usefulness" itself. Although this may not be a widespread perception. It could have a ton of implications dependent on context, etc.
 
On the subject of
"They are wrong to use animals for..."
and
"The are wrong using animals for.."

They are both correct, but i would probably use the 1st over the 2nd. I'm not sure if it grammatically incorrect, but it looks bad in writing, it sounds okay in conversational English, though.

I would do it like this
"Using animals for test subjects is immoral(or 何々).."
or to keep "they" as the subject.
"That they are using animals for test subjects is immoral(or 何々).."

and

"They are wrong to use animals for test subjects(or 何々).."


On the subject of "tried buying" and "tried to buy"

"tried to buy" indicates that you were not able to buy, but you tried.
"tried buying" means that you bought something for the first time (and had such and such a reaction.)

I tried buying the kit-kat grape flavor and i loved it!!
I tried buying the kit-kat galaxy flavor and it was terrible!
I tried to buy the kit-kat tokyo flavor but my credit card was declined.

Purchase consideration :
Have you ever tried buying/to buy fresh flowers online?

Here i would only use "tried buying". "Tried to buy" sounds like:
"Have you ever tried to buy fresh flowers online but right when you were about to finalize the order, your internet cut out?" which works, but I don't think its what you were going for.

Purchase attempt :
I tried buying/to buy fresh flowers online, but the floral company didn't accept my credit card.

In this both work.

Purchase failure :

I tried buying/to buy fresh flowers online, but they arrived wilted and withered.

Here i wouldn't use "to buy", it doesn't sound right to me.
"Tried to buy" is for when the attempt is a failure and you arent able to buy it in the end. (I think!! 😌 )
Hope this helps
 
On the subject of
"They are wrong to use animals for..."
and
"The are wrong using animals for.."

They are both correct, but i would probably use the 1st over the 2nd. I'm not sure if it grammatically incorrect, but it looks bad in writing, it sounds okay in conversational English, though.

I would do it like this
"Using animals for test subjects is immoral(or 何々).."
or to keep "they" as the subject.
"That they are using animals for test subjects is immoral(or 何々).."

and

"They are wrong to use animals for test subjects(or 何々).."


On the subject of "tried buying" and "tried to buy"

"tried to buy" indicates that you were not able to buy, but you tried.
"tried buying" means that you bought something for the first time (and had such and such a reaction.)

I tried buying the kit-kat grape flavor and i loved it!!
I tried buying the kit-kat galaxy flavor and it was terrible!
I tried to buy the kit-kat tokyo flavor but my credit card was declined.



Here i would only use "tried buying". "Tried to buy" sounds like:
"Have you ever tried to buy fresh flowers online but right when you were about to finalize the order, your internet cut out?" which works, but I don't think its what you were going for.



In this both work.



Here i wouldn't use "to buy", it doesn't sound right to me.
"Tried to buy" is for when the attempt is a failure and you arent able to buy it in the end. (I think!! 😌 )
Hope this helps


Thank you for elucidating the difference, aardwolf.
Your post helped a lot.

People were pointing out things of that line but I was too dim-witted to recognise their points, pretty silly I was.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


And I am sorry nice gaijin that you did tell me something important and I failed to see it.:sorry:
wouldn't it be like the difference between 買おうとした and 買ってみた?

Seems like "Tried to buy" indicates an attempt at the act of purchasing, which probably led to failure. "Tried buying" sounds more like it wasn't the act of purchasing, but the outcome was unknown at the time of purchase.
"買おうとした and 買ってみた?" There are cavernous difference between "した" and "みた" in some context. The former is indeed "tried buying" but the later sounds like"have bought and saw what it does or how it is?".
It is related to he role of te from of verb I think. I wrote something about it yesterday:
I am happy to speak with you

For statements like 「山にのぼってみたが、頂上にはたどり着かなかった」 and 「山に登ろうとしたが、頂上にはたどり着かなかった」, what you have pointed out is exactly right. Strictly speaking there can be difference but not like anyone actually cares generally anyway.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

"Anxious to be helpful" at a trait level shows focus on the relief of "anxiety" through helping behavior and subtly away from the altruistic benefits of "helpfulness"/"usefulness" itself. Although this may not be a widespread perception. It could have a ton of implications dependent on context, etc.

Thanks for the reply Elizabeth, to think about it now probably not much association with the topic but now I think I understand the difference all thanks to you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

As far as the original question regarding "try to buy" vs. "try buying" is concerned, I agree with what Nice Gaijin has suggested (買おうとする / 買ってみる).
For example,
You had seen a TV ad for this great new brand of laundry detergent and decided to give it a try.
"I tried to buy the new brand but it was sold out."
"I tried buying the new brand for a while but it doesn't get the really tough stains out like they say in the ads and it was not worth the higher price."
In the first sentence, "try" in conjunction with "to + infinitive", means to put in an effort, or 目的(洗剤を買うこと)に向かって努力する、while in the second, the same verb "try" means something different. It means to sample, to see how it is、or 試す as in "try on a pair of jeans". So, what exactly did you 試す? Buying (and using) the detergent.
Another example.
"Try to be here on time next week, OK? We can't start the show without the drummer."
来週は決められた時間に来るようにしてよね、いい? ドラマーがいなくちゃショーが始められないの。 (決められた時間にはここに来るように努力する
"If you don't want the rest of the band being mad at you, why don't you try being here on time for once?"
バンドのみんなに怒られるのが(みんなが怒っているのが)いやならさ、一度時間通りに来てみたら? (一度試しに時間通りに来てみる
I am sure there are variables but basically, that is how I would make the distinction between the two in this particular case of "try to ~ / try ~ing".

目的(洗剤を買うこと)に向かって努力する
hmm, interesting interpretation, while I am not quite sure if I understood properly, I do see something to do with intention or emotion, I wonder why it happens?: which gave me and idea that I've been trying to understand gerund alone but verb form exits in association with other parts of speech, so maybe I need to think about this more.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>



it is wrong using animals for..==>superior
They are wrong using animals for...==>bad

In many situations, the gerand seems more vivid, more emotionally urgent or immediate ("in progress") and tends to be used more either by the people actually doing the action or directed at the behavior itself. And in this particular instance, the wrongness of the perpetrators is of secondary concern to the impact on the animals. Presumably. "

Up to the above point everyone seems to reach general consensus, but when it comes down to the interpretation of "Tried buying something", I see some diversity in opinions.

Possible causes:
regional differences
Difference in written and spoken English
The meaning of the sentence is Context dependent.

To sum up what has been posted so far(Probably doing this pretty badly though).
And from re-reading ASHIKAGA's post and breaking down the sentence, I came up with following:
Tried buying=====>
Attempted to curry out an action of buying
or
Tested the resultant state or result of action of buying

So there were two things to consider here: one is the possible meanings of "tried" in context and the other is gerund association with continuity or time.

On the other hand, for
Tried to buy=======>
"attempted to curry out an action of buying" is the only interpretation at least in this particular context, so to-infinitive regarded as something discrete in association with time?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The potential of gerund to signify " resultant state of an action or time after" is rather interesting one:
Upon entering the Mansion, all felt their senses crooked.
Maybe this sort of usage is one of the reasons that people get different feelings from gerunds and to-infinitives?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Now back to the difference of gerunds and to-infinitives when they can be used interchangeably.
I tried to buy it, but it was all sold out.
I tried buying it, but someone else got the last one.

At the point they can be used interchangeably, they are rather similar but, for people to say that they are different, I guess in some context, they may not be interchangeable to convey subtle difference?

How do interpret the below?
I tried buying it, but a boy snatched the last one before met.
I think: (I was in the act of buying)
I tried to buy it, but a by Snatched the last one before me.
I think: (I attempted the action but before I started, someone else got it)

Thank you Elizabeth, nice gaijin, ASHIKAGA, and aardwolf for posting.
I appreciate your patience and generosity to share your wisdom and using your valuable time for us.
 
Um, I supposed my post was way too bulky and unreadable...
My apologies(I just thought it is rude to just ignore people's posts but oh well).

Anyone can tell me if these guesses are right?

Tried buying=====>
Attempted to curry out an action of buying
or
Tested the resultant state or result of action of buying

Tried to buy=======>
"attempted to curry out an action of buying"

The gerunds have potential to signify " resultant state of an action or time after":
Upon entering the Mansion, all felt their senses crooked.

In these cases, Gerunds and to-infinitive can be used interchangeably.
However, there are subtle differences?
I tried buying it, but a boy snatched the last one before met.
I think: (Subject "I" was in the act of buying)
I tried to buy it, but a boy Snatched the last one before me.
I think: (Subject "I" attempted the action but before he/she started, someone else got the item and attempt failed).

Thank you Elizabeth, nice gaijin, ASHIKAGA, and aardwolf for posting.
I appreciate your patience and generosity to share your wisdom and using your valuable time for us.
 
Here i wouldn't use "to buy", it doesn't sound right to me.
"Tried to buy" is for when the attempt is a failure and you arent able to buy it in the end. (I think!! 😌 )
Hope this helps
For sure, though, "tried to buy" also works when an attempt should, or is predicted to, lead to failure but one in which the outcome is either unknown or ends up outright successful. I see absolutely no distinction in these cases other than "to buy" as formal and "buying" for colloquial speech.

45 percent of the minors who tried to buy cigarettes and 57 percent of those who tried to buy chewing tobacco or snuff said they were never asked to show proof of their age.

Of 94 attempts to buy cigarettes, 59 were successful, and 42 of 71 attempts to buy smokeless tobacco products were successful.

Yahoo! recently approached Time Warner Inc. about buying AOL, but a lot of analysts believe it would actually make more sense if Time Warner tried to buy Yahoo itself. etc


In these cases, Gerunds and to-infinitive can be used interchangeably.
However, there are subtle differences?
I tried buying it, but a boy snatched the last one before met.
I think: (Subject "I" was in the act of buying)
I tried to buy it, but a boy Snatched the last one before me.
I think: (Subject "I" attempted the action but before he/she started, someone else got the item and attempt failed).
Although they are basically interchangable, driven by slightly stronger connotations of not being able to, "tried to buy, but..." if anything may emphasize frustration at the failure of a process outside of a subject's control (goal-directed activity is thwarted by being picked off by a boy at close range). So "Tried to buy" may show stronger intent or emotion but a lot of the meaning is decoded also through prosadic elements of pitch, stress, intonation etc. of course which may account for the disagreements here. It is an ambiguity that becomes nearly invisible in real context.
 
Last edited:
For sure, though, "tried to buy" also works when an attempt should, or is predicted to, lead to failure but one in which the outcome is either unknown or ends up outright successful. I see absolutely no distinction in these cases other than "to buy" as formal and "buying" for colloquial speech.

45 percent of the minors who tried to buy cigarettes and 57 percent of those who tried to buy chewing tobacco or snuff said they were never asked to show proof of their age.

Of 94 attempts to buy cigarettes, 59 were successful, and 42 of 71 attempts to buy smokeless tobacco products were successful.

Yahoo! recently approached Time Warner Inc. about buying AOL, but a lot of analysts believe it would actually make more sense if Time Warner tried to buy Yahoo itself. etc



Although they are basically interchangable, driven by slightly stronger connotations of not being able to, "tried to buy, but..." if anything may emphasize frustration at the failure of a process outside of a subject's control (goal-directed activity is thwarted by being picked off by a boy at close range). So "Tried to buy" may show stronger intent or emotion but a lot of the meaning is decoded also through prosadic elements of pitch, stress, intonation etc. of course which may account for the disagreements here. It is an ambiguity that becomes nearly invisible in real context.

Thank you Elizabeth for the reply and reading my post.

It is very curious that
"Tried to buy" may show stronger intent or emotion but a lot of the meaning is decoded also through prosadic elements of pitch, stress, intonation etc.

Looks like I can have some more fun with this :D


p.s
Um, it is very hard to get rid of typos and normally it does not matter: the other day I posted something like 「インフレーションレイトを製作する」, which is of cause more than a typo and ten times more embarrassing:(

But anyway, there are some good spell check plug-ins around:
Search results for "spell" – Add-ons for Firefox (en-US)


p.p.s
I do not know if anyone is interested but some resource here:
Gerunds and Infinitives: Their Noun Roles
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom