On 9-11 3 steel framed buildings collapsed due to fire. If the building was hit hard by debris it still does not collapse. Have you seen buildings from war torn countries? Have you seen pictures from say Beirut or Sarajevo? The buildings have alot of holes and is shattered but they still don't collapse.
And they're also incomparable because they are made of different materials, construction techniques and were damaged in different ways. This isn't hard stuff to understand, mate.
Have you seen pictures of Kobe after the earth quake? How many buildings collapsed like they did on 9-11? 0.
Again, genius, your comparing apple and oranges. How is an earth quake like being hit by a jet liner or a cloud full of hundreds of tons of concrete debris?
Buildings collapsed but not like they did in New York. This could be because of the construction design but I think that possibility sounds even less likely.
Yes.
Based on
what? Do you see the recurring theme here in my questioning: why? Why is it less likely?
We see clear pictures of rockets being shot so how hard can it be to show a clear picture of a commercial airliner? In one of the most heavily secured buildings on this earth.
What rockets? When? Try introducing an element before discussing it. What rockets caught on clear picture?
Suicide bombings is not regarded as suicides but martyr operation.
Right, that cleared that up.
Seriously, what are you going on about? So the same halfwits who think killing innocent people is a great idea also consider it a martyr operation, who cares? How does that change what people who in theory have an IQ above 12 think of the matter?
Scarificing your life in battle is not seen as coward.
How is killing innocent people who can't fight back 'a battle'? It's an exercise in murder by most people's definitions I think.
I think they have more guts than American soldiers hiding behind millitary tanks shooting at bomb shelters though.
It takes a lot of guts to murder innocent people who you've taken completely by surprise and who have no means of defending themselves.
I don't agree with any of them but if I have to chose what I think is the most coward. It surely is not the peopole who are willing to sacrifice their lives for a cause. Any attack on civilian is wrong. I personally think punching people is wrong too.
Then what in the name of God were your last few paragraphs about?
It also is coward to impose sanctions on a country and starving close up to a million people like what US did to Iraq prior to the war leading to 9-11.
Which naturally makes everything else completely all right?
If you look at that picture how come the buildings around WTC 1,2 did not collapse but only WTC7?
Because these pictures show the path of debris and the relative structure of buildings? These things are more important than looking at a photograph.
I care immensely when you're making up these random bat**** data to support what you're saying.
With your own eyes. Take a look at the picture and see for yourself.
Again with this total w***.
The whole point is jet fuel fire does not get hot enought to melt steel! The law of science says that this is impossible. If the water temperature is 60 degrees the water does not start to boil. This is another law of science.
They say it doesn't have to melt but only make it softer. And that is enough to make the building collapse. However I argue that it didn't get hot enought to even make steel softer.
And on WHAT do you base this? ***.
While I am not an engineer so I am not a specialist in this field.
That much is cripplingly apparently.
Just the fact that a number of engineers are critical to the US version makes it strange.
'Critical' does not equate to 'it's a huge conspiracy look at the photos LOL' really, does it?
Google jet fuel fire. And you end up with alot of web results.
Which means what?
If it wasn't a set up you would have thought that they would atleast not clean the mess and ship the steel away ASAP like the US government did.
Or alternatively it wasn't a set up and they didn't feel the need to leave the rubble there just to please bozos on the internet with too much time on their hands.
Do you remeber how quick they were to point at someone? Then one of Bush's quotes was that there is no room for conspiracy?
Standard politics, blame someone quickly to give the public focus.
These same people wrote a few years earlier through PNAC that a Pearl Harbour style attack is needed to boost millitary spendings. Need a Pearl Harbour? You have to be a nutcase to state in public that US needs a Peral Harbour.
So the US instigated the whole thing to increase military funding. And then lose all of that funding in the cost of fighting two ongoing wars in the Middle East.
So the whole exercise was essentially to get the military's budget increased and then blow it all on extra cruise missiles?
http://www.guildcafe.com/gallery/data/500/icantbelieve128386848407685000.jpg
Here is a picture, since you seem to like them so, now study it. Study it VERY CAREFULLY. OPEN YOUR EYES. Do you see, now?
