Hello everyone, I'm new here --- yoroshiku onegaishimasu.
"Why do the Japanese copy everything?" Funny question. Very stereotyped. (Silly examples, too - Disneyland!) It invites some questions in response:
Do the Japanese copy everything?
Do they copy more than other countries do?
Is that a bad thing?
I think the Japanese do copy a lot, but not everything. They don't copy things that go against their values. For instance, they address each other with surname and title. They haven't copied the American habit of calling everyone by first name. In Britain, everyone used to do the same as the Japanese (surname and title), but recently, they have copied the American custom. Why? Hard to say. Is it a good thing that Britain did this, or should they have resisted? Also hard to say.
As to whether they copy more than other countries do, well historically (from the
Meiji period up to the 1970s or so), I would say the Japanese copied a huge amount from the West, and before that, they copied perhaps even more from China, but now, though they still copy, they don't do so as much. Basically, its because they're so advanced now, there isn't much for them to copy any more. Now, they invent so much, the rest of the world is copying them. South Korea copies Japan a lot, and so do China and other countries in Asia (to a lesser extent). The West copies Japanese design (and has done since the 19th century), as well as other arts.
It is a bad thing? I don't think it is a bad thing to copy, in general, if you copy the right things from the right people for the right reasons. Copying successful people increases your own chances of success. Copying skillfully-made things enables you to learn a lot of techniques. After a certain amount of copying, it becomes easier to invent at a high level. Copying, discriminately, from a wide range of sources, is a sign of open-mindedness. There are some societies that barely copy anything from anyone, because they are too wrapped up in their own narrow ideas. Such societies tend to get left behind. Compare North Korea, which scarcely copies anything, with South Korea, which is extremely good at copying practically everything. Which is doing better?
It seems to me that we can turn the thread question on its head: instead of asking why the Japanese copy everything, we should maybe ask, why do we in the West think that this is a reason to criticise someone? I think there is a popular idea in the West that copying is bad because it is the opposite of originality, but we forget how much we copied in the past (rugs from India; porcelain, ink, paper, printing, gunpowder and more from China; algebra and bookkeeping from the Arabs, etc.), and how much great artists and inventors copied each other in the past, as well as how much copying goes on in general between everyone. Maybe we should ask ourselves what the world would be like if there were no copying. Perhaps the first university in the world would be the only one, and the first newspaper and the first train and the first car, and so on. What a strange world it would be! We in the West are weird for thinking that copying is bad.