I find all of your post absolutely baffling. I'll simply connect that to the points you wrote in the first two parts here.I find it morbidly amusing how Japan gets bashed for re-popularizing a form of fashion that rich Victorian* neo-puritan wankers dressed up their kids in. This stuff originated in the west, now Westerners want to wash their hands of it. Why?
Anti-pedo hysteria is big reason why. Its getting so bad that even you look at a kid you can be suspected of being a witch...excuse me...I mean pedo.
I find all of your post absolutely baffling. I'll simply connect that to the points you wrote in the first two parts here.
1. How is Japan being bashed in this thread?
2. What does Lolita fashion have to do with the term lolita as it is understood in the West? They may come from the same book, but the concepts are pretty separated by culture and language. In Japan, it based on a weird Victorian re-imagining, but in the West, it is about sexy 13-year olds. So what does this thread have to do with pedophilia?
Zorro's Rorschach Test, I worry.
I've heard it's because it's anti-sexual. So much fashion in Japan is based on showing leg, wearing sexy make-up, and showing your figure off. Lolita is against all that, and is in some ways like a burqa. Women get to desexualize themselves. As much as it doesn't turn me on, and I like seeing more 'traditional' women in Japan, I totally get why a woman would want to do something that makes her a person rather than a 'woman'
Still don't get who your rant was against. I haven't seen people bash Japan over this, or connect it to pedophilia. Must be something in your own personal experience that leads you to it.
Girls in Victorian costumes? None whatsoever. Let it go.
I find it morbidly amusing how Japan gets bashed for re-popularizing a form of fashion that rich Victorian* neo-puritan wankers dressed up their kids in. This stuff originated in the west, now Westerners want to wash their hands of it. Why?
Anti-pedo hysteria is big reason why. Its getting so bad that even you look at a kid you can be suspected of being a witch...excuse me...I mean pedo.
So what if you happen to like updated Victorian kid's garb? Well then, in the hysterical Westerner's eyes, you are either a pedo or immature and promoting pedophilia. And those are big fat (and I dare say STUPID) taboos right now. So if you are a Westerner in the west who likes this fashion (and this relates to anime, manga, and whole lot of kawaii) you are freak with connections to child sex abuse, or at least that is what is their hyper-ventilating paranoid sub-conscious mind is telling them. The instictive reaction is to ATTACK, albeit with words and ostracism these days rather than fists.
Frankly its easier to get up and go to a foreign country and learn their customs and language than deal with that type of stupid $#!T.
And some people do get off on doing the counter-culture thing. I am not especially interested in Lolita fashion, but I do enjoy the "stick it in the hysterical westerner's face" campaign it does seem to represent for some.
Some also enjoy the sense of nostalgia. Like I said, this stuff is Western and Victorian. You see it in old pictures and period movies.
*(Victorian era, named after that prude biatc# queen victoria, who had to have a fig leaf put on the Statue of David just for the sake of her sex-negative cun# eyes).
you seem to having something against Victorian people, how come?
I am against sex-negative attitudes and concepts, and the Victorians were the embodiment of them. The way they told it, sex was evil and caused nothing but trouble for the human race. In fact, it was the Victorians who caused nothing but trouble for the human race, and we still wrestle with their garbage against anything sexual today. Even the Sexual Revolution did not succeed in erasing the mountain of sex negativity in English speaking countries. For example, its only recently that gays have been accepted into society to a degree that can be considered respectable, but still a long way to go.
Sex education is in a horrible state, where they try to teach about sex without teaching "too much" or be clear, and the result is out of control teen pregnancy in the U.S. and Britain.
The fact that brand of cereal would still call itself "Kelloggs" after John Harvey Kellogg, who used to burn off women's clitorises with carbolic acid, is a testament to just how sex-negative America is, because if it was sex positive, there is no way anyone would market a product with that scumbags name on it.