This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Politics The role of the Unification Church in Japanese politics



After millions in Yen spent and a year of searching.......
 
I didn't know that the government has the legal authority to interpret laws: yesterday, PM Kishida reversed the government's interpretation of a law, stating that Civil Code violations are grounds for forcing a religious corporation to disband. Just a day earlier, in discussions at the Lower House Budget Committee session on what to do about the Unification Church, Kishida said the basis to request a court order to dissolve an organization under the Religious Corporations Law could only be criminal activity.


In the end, wouldn't it be for the courts to interpret the Religious Corporations Law?

 
Asahi reported that the Unification Church asked several LDP candidates to sign "policy pacts" to push political issues ranking high on UC's agenda, such as revising the constitution, strengthening the national security framework, and remaining cautious about legalizing same-sex marriages and other matters related to sexual minorities. Such pacts would allow the organizations and lawmakers to maintain ties after elections and let the groups say they are on close terms with the LDP. Allegedly, a few dozen LDP candidates were approached, but not all agreed to sign.


 
This is just in: Minister of Economy, Trade, and Industry Daishiro Yamagiwa decided to step down in the light of mounting criticism over his close ties to the Unification Church.



Also today, PM Kishida stated that he was "willing to listen" to victims of UC's exploitative practices but had no intention to hold an internal probe into pre-election "policy pacts" between Liberal Democratic Party lawmakers and groups affiliated with the Unification Church.



His unwillingness or inability to deal with this terrible mess will be his downfall. Finding LDP candidates untainted by the UC scandal will pose a challenge.
 
Japan's ruling parties said that they have given up on the idea of submitting a bill to create a new law regulating malicious demands for donations by religious groups during the current parliamentary session. It seems the 'ruling bloc' disagrees with the opposition's idea of setting a limit on donations and introducing criminal punishment against such practices.




I wonder why the 'ruling bloc' is so reluctant to regulate donations. Are they still protecting their former UC buddies, or is Komeito behind it?
 
I for one am shocked! Shocked I say!
 
More policy zigzags after a poll revealed a further decline in public approval for his Cabinet: PM Kishida is now pushing for a ban on egregious donations sought by the Unification Church. His approval ratings have dropped below 36 per cent.

Ruling by polling: isn't that direct democracy?


 
Today, Nikkei looks closely at the various efforts to build a case against the Unification Church: with more victims speaking out and an impending probe into the cult and its broad societal implications, a formal dissolution of the cult no longer appears to be unlikely.


The case of Ms Ogawa (not her real name) is as uncanny as that of Abe's attacker:


On 11 November, PM Kishida announced that the government would invoke its right to question the Unification Church's activities under Japan's Religious Corporation Law. The announcement followed months of revelations about links between his ruling Liberal Democratic Party and the church.


Paywall alert:
 
According to a Kyodo News survey published yesterday, at least 334 out of 2,570 prefectural assembly members in Japan have had dealings with the Unification Church or its affiliates, with over 80 per cent of them belonging to --surprise, surprise-- the ruling Liberal Democratic Party.





 
Today, the Diet passed a bill aiming to provide relief to followers of the controversial Unification Church and their families who have suffered financially after making large donations to the organization.





Paywall alert:
 
Though the LDP brass probably does their utmost to keep a lid on these stories, sometimes they bubble up. Yesterday, Mainichi reported that - according to a Sun Myung Moon sermon - Hirofumi Nakasone, the son of former PM Yasuhiro Nakasone, was elected with the help of 300 Japanese Moonie households. Hirofumi, a former foreign minister, currently serves his seventh term in the Upper House and chairs the Commission on the Constitution.


The Nakasone office and the Unification Church deny any contact or mutual support.


 
This promises to be interesting: a group of fifty former members of the Unification Church are demanding 1.6 billion JPY (USD 11.8 million) in compensation from the religious group over what they say were deceptive and unlawful tactics to take their money. Mind this will not be a court case but an out-of-court settlement from the church through collective negotiations.


 
It's only fair that the victims of these grifters aren't left out in the cold without recompense. Bleed 'em dry.
 
This issue is far from over and will probably have some impact on the local elections next April. Today, Mainichi Shimbun reported that 170 local lawmakers in Japan joined a 2020 event tied to the Unification Church, with most of them accepting the UC's invitation (flight and accommodation). However, some returned the travel expenses later.



Most lawmakers paid the expenses out of their political activity fund, but some of them later returned the money:

"I met various lawmakers there. There was no problem with applying for the money as political activity funds, but with the way things are in society, I returned it."


 
I had to read this twice to grasp: The Japanese government mulls/considers/contemplates/eyes the dissolution of the Unification Church!







The only question is, why have they been waiting so long??
 
The only question is, why have they been waiting so long??

Politics and greed. Too many politicians had their hand in that cookie jar and they needed time to disassociate themselves before the lid snapped shut on their hands. Everyone left will have been deemed expendable and unreliable enough to have any accusations they make dismissed.
 
The chutzpah.... the Unification Church demanded that NHK cancel an 'insulting' program' on their more than shady recruitment methods. NHK changed part of the program's title, which the group viewed as problematic, and aired it as scheduled on 23 September. It is unusual for the Unification Church, now known formally as the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification, to demand the cancelation of a program before it is aired, and an expert pointed out that the group may have been seeking to discourage media coverage.



 
Regardless of if the unification church finds it insulting, if its true then do they really have any legal leg to stand on? I think NHK should have ignored them and not given in at all.

.... and maybe moved the program to prime time with advertisements in the weeks before airing. Just saying.
 
More flak for the Moonies: the National Network of Lawyers Against Spiritual Sales reported that claims of donation fraud totalling more than ¥1.9 billion had been made since March 2009 against the Unification Church.





Sadly, there have been no updates on the fanfare made at the beginning of September when it was reported that the government sought to dissolve the Unification Church (see post #67 above).
 
After a nearly yearlong probe into the religious organisation, the Japanese government decided today to seek a court order to strip the Unification Church of its religious corporation status. If the court issues an order, the Unification Church would lose its tax benefits as a religious corporation, although it could still operate as an entity in Japan.

Only two other religious corporations have ever been disbanded: the Aum Shinrikyo doomsday cult that was responsible for deadly sarin attacks on the Tokyo subway network in 1995 and the Myokakuji temple group, whose leader and executives were accused of defrauding followers through exorbitant fees paid for memorial services to honour the deceased.


 
In a press conference yesterday, the Unification Church vowed to fight the Japanese government's request for a court dissolution, saying its interpretation of the Religious Corporations Law is "completely out of line." The church described the education ministry's request for the dissolution order as a "demand for the death penalty."





The Asahi article below argues that dissolution orders had little impact on religious entities in the past.


 
Today, for the first time, the Unification Church apologized for the suffering it has caused to followers and their families since the assassination of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe last year, which renewed public interest in the group over its coercive donation tactics. The group also announced they would set aside up to 10 billion JPY for future damages claims from former followers and their family members if the court revokes its religious corporation status.



Unification Church ready to set aside ¥10 billion fund for victims
 
The court hearings on the order to dissolve the Unification Church will start later this month.

Meanwhile, Education Minister Moriyama Masahito admitted yesterday that he signed a de facto "policy pact" with a group affiliated with the Unification Church before it supported his campaign in the 2021 Lower House election. The agreement sought support for policies of the church, such as "revising the Constitution and strengthening the security system," "working to enact the family education support law and the basic law for the sound development of youth," "handling LGBT issues and the legalization of same-sex marriage with caution," and "promoting the realization of the Japan-Korea tunnel."





 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…