Jericho Desu
七転八起
- 23 Feb 2008
- 1,105
- 28
Hmm, it seems to me that the nuance is from the context.Hey guys, I've got a bunch of questions to ask so I decided to make this thread, I hope some of you can help me out. I'm just starting off with a couple.
1: I read that one of the usages if なり is similar to とたん in the sense of something happening right after something else. For example:
家へ帰るなり、すぐに出かけた
There are supposedly two differences one being the tenses of the verb and the other I read is that なり is always used for something that is unexpected. However in one of my grammatical books it doesn't mention the second difference and has sentences like:
彼は、宿題を済ませるなり遊びに行ってしまった。
Which I don't see as having that nuance, so is that second difference true or not? Or is it just a nuance that doesn't necessarily have to be there depending on the context?
あれば is just a conditional; "if/when~". あるとすれば emphasizes the meaning, something like "it might be rare, but if~".2: 失敗する可能性があるとすれば、止めましょう
失敗する可能性があれば、止めましょう
How is the meaning and/or nuance changed? Because as far as I can tell they are both just hypothesizing something.
Sorry I don't have a chance to answer now, but just to clarify やっぱ is just a silly colloquial way of saying やっぱり, right ? And しような could be しようね...Thank you Toritoribe (sorry it took me so long to thank you)
I have another problem and thats with としても and にしても. Now the way I understand it so far is that they both have a usage involving hypothesis, however としても has other usages. In terms of hypothesis, what is the difference in nuance between the two? For example:
新車を買うとしても、今度もやっぱ黒いのにしような。
vs
新車を買うにしても、今度もやっぱ黒いのにしような。
Also does にしても have other functions? I've heard of "それにしても" as a sort of sentence opener of some sort, maybe emphasizing the information following? Sorry of my questions are being a bit vague, any help would be appreciated, thanks.
Sorry I don't have a chance to answer now, but just to clarify やっぱ is just a silly colloquial way of saying やっぱり, right ? And しような could be しようね..
t's almost certainly something the speaker is saying to themselves. That type of language is used all over, though. It's not a Kansai thing. Sorry, can't offer much insight into としても vs. にしても, but I get the feeling they're pretty much interchangeable.
しような is a manly version of しようね, thus, it's used for confirmation. When speaking to themselves, しようかな is used.;-)
Really? You can't just be saying "if I were to get a new car, I'd go with a black one again" to yourself with しような in this instance?
And するかな in contrast to しようかな I suppose would be speaking in the third person ?Yeah, しような is used only when talking to the second person as same as しようね. When speaking to the speaker him/herself, しようかな, しよう(with the falling intonation), しようっと, etc. is used.
Yeah, not necessarily emphasizing - like けど or other fillers, it simply doesn't have much meaning at all on its own. You can think of examples in English as well - "(But) even so" "in any case" "nevertheless" etc.Also does にしても have other functions? I've heard of "それにしても" as a sort of sentence opener of some sort, maybe emphasizing the information following?
I thought the basic function of にしても was as to convey the sense of an instructive, "even if" ... still "should"/must/command-type statement to a second or third party. It doesn't have to be in the past, though...:?しような is a manly version of しようね, thus, it's used for confirmation. When speaking to themselves, しようかな is used.;-)
にしても can be used for a fact in the past. In that case, it often has negative connotation. See the example below.
新車を買うにしても、相談してくれればよかったのに。
The second or third person already bought a new car, and the speaker isn't pleased about it; something like 新車を買わないほうがよかったと思うけど、買うにしても、相談してくれればよかったのに. としても is rarely used for this case.
窶
な in しような is asking for another for assertion, agreement, like "shall we?/shan't we?"
It's a bit strange when speaking to oneself...
Without な, it's quite normal.
Yeah, しような is used only when talking to the second person as same as しようね. When speaking to the speaker him/herself, しようかな, しよう(with the falling intonation), しようっと, etc. is used.
I think when you are wondering aloud to yourself, kane/kai is usually replaced with kana...Second, I thought な was pretty much restricted to internal comment-type statements, and for it to be seeking agreement it would come after a pause, like そうしよう、な? I guess that's not right, though...
Yeah, that nuance is from ても, so 買うとしても, 買うにしても, 買っても all can have that connotation.I'm still a bit confused about the example, though. としても I think is basically analogous to (たとえ) でも or であっても as it indicates (to me) the speaker's hesitation or reluctance to engage in an action - in this case to buy the car. This is a major way that is different from とすれば or としたら.
It's a conversation in a family, for instance, from husband to wife. Does this make sense?;-)This is mind-blowing. First, I don't understand why... wait, are they both buying the car? That seems strange. It looks like the person is saying just that if they were to get a car now, it'd be a black one. So here's what I don't get: what are they asking for agreement about? It looks for all the world like it's just the speaker's thoughts about buying a car if they were to do so.
今度の試合、絶対勝とうな。(manly version of 勝とうね)Second, I thought な was pretty much restricted to internal comment-type statements, and for it to be seeking agreement it would come after a pause, like そうしよう、な? I guess that's not right, though...
I also asked a friend in Japan just out of curiosity, and here is his response (from work, so excuse the formality). ;-)Thank you Toritoribe (sorry it took me so long to thank you)
I have another problem and thats with としても and にしても. Now the way I understand it so far is that they both have a usage involving hypothesis, however としても has other usages. In terms of hypothesis, what is the difference in nuance between the two? For example:
新車を買うとしても、今度もやっぱ黒いのにしような。
vs
新車を買うにしても、今度もやっぱ黒いのにしような。
Also does にしても have other functions? I've heard of "それにしても" as a sort of sentence opener of some sort, maybe emphasizing the information following? Sorry of my questions are being a bit vague, any help would be appreciated, thanks.
It's a conversation in a family, for instance, from husband to wife. Does this make sense?;-)
I also asked a friend in Japan just out of curiosity, and here is his response (from work, so excuse the formality). ;-)
大きな違いがあるとは思えませんが、1.より2.の方が新 車を
買う可能性が高いような感じがします。
人によっては逆に感じるかも知れません。
アツ。