- 24 May 2004
- 1,046
- 12
No, it's not even particularly close.GoldCoinLover said:Please help -- Is this right?
貴方は私の名前を正しく表記しました。 = Ahh, you and I names surely declare shimashita.'
私の名前は「永島 宏幸」です。 = My name means "long island", and "large fortune."
うっ・・・・英語は・・・中学生以下です。= [my] japanese is middle high school level because (its inferior).
英語の翻訳は文明のに頼ってます。 = My english translation is from my cultural ability (favor).
This may come off as cruel, but I need to say it.GoldCoinLover said:The above is something I figured out with my rudimentary japanese skills and looking up kanji. I introduced myself on the Introduce section of the japanese section of these forums.
tee hee, thats funny.GoldCoinLover said:私の名前は「永島 宏幸」です。 = My name means "long island", and "large fortune."
that's a good point there jt. since when is "shimashita" an english word?If an English translation sounds like nonsense, it's usually a good sign that that's _not_ what the original Japanese meant.
jt_ said:No, it's not even particularly close.
貴方は私の名前を正しく表記しました。
You wrote my name correctly. (i.e. Nagashima-san is telling you that you wrote his name with the proper characters.)
私の名前は「永島 宏幸」です。
My name is "永島 宏幸" (Nagashima Hiroyuki, written with those characters).
うっ・・・・英語は・・・中学生以下です。
Urgh... my English is... at the level of a junior high student or worse...
英語の翻訳は文明のに頼ってます。
I'm relying on "civilization" for English translation.
(i.e. this is a reference to the fact that he's using [man-made] automated translation software to translate his posts into English)
This may come off as cruel, but I need to say it.
What you're doing here isn't going to help you learn Japanese. You're lacking something very important -- namely, even a rudimentary understanding of Japanese sentence structure. Japanese isn't just a bunch of kanji slapped together to create some random, abstract meaning.
I mean, go back and read over your 'translation' of the original text. Does it make any real sense in English? If an English translation sounds like nonsense, it's usually a good sign that that's _not_ what the original Japanese meant.
If you're really serious about learning the language, I suggest that you get yourself a textbook and start from page 1. You'll save yourself a lot of trouble and wasted effort.
永島さん、Hiroyuki Nagashima said:文章を口語体で筆記したため
ケヴィンさんには、だいぶ迷惑をおかけしました。
Because I wrote a sentence in a colloquial style, I troubled Kevin considerably.
jt_ said:永島さん、
ご丁寧な説明ありがとうございます。ケビンさんもきっと勉強になったと思います。
永島さんの文章には問題がないと思いますので、どうか気になさらないで下さい。
ケビンさんはまだ日本語を始めたばかりらしくて、まだ文法などがあまり分かっていない様ですね。
やはり辞書で単語を調べても、言葉と言葉の「つながり」が分からないと、文章の意味を
理解するのは非常に難しいことですね。というより、無理に近いと思います。
ですから一応彼に言っておいたのですが、本当に日本語を読めるようになりたいのなら、
やはり教科書を買って、その1ページから勉強するのですね。きついことを言って
しまったような気もしますが、やっぱり彼は今の調子では、効果のない勉強法で
情熱を無駄にしてしまいそうですからね。
では、これからも永島さんから色々勉強させていただきたいと思っていますから
よろしくお願いします!
Damicci said:Are you just plugging this stuff into a translator or are you actually noting down the kanji (stroke order VERY IMPORTANT - and the hiragana)? How are you going about studying?
I am also studying Japanese solo i had a friend teaching me but she taught me basics so i know hiragana and katakana some kanji but from all the studying i have been doing I can only read some kanji couldn't write it for the life of me.
You say you understand basic Japanese structure, but in another post of yours, you didn't seem to know what "shimashita" is, and didn't realize that a sentence ending in "ka" is a question. I'm not trying to insult you here -- I know that you're just starting, and everyone has to start somewhere. But these are very basic grammar points, and if you don't understand this stuff, learning all the kanji in the world isn't going to help you actually read Japanese.GoldCoinLover said:I do understand basic japanese structure. I do not understand the kanji sentences yet.
jt_ said:GoldCoinLover,
P.S. regarding stroke order: "respect for the language" may be part of it, but two other ways it will help you are 1) it'll keep your handwriting legible and 2) you'll need to be able to count strokes properly if you ever want to use a kanji dictionary to look up unfamiliar characters.
jt_ said:GoldCoinLover,
Just some free advice: don't get too kanji-obsessed too quickly. Yes, if you want to become proficient in reading Japanese, you're eventually going to have to learn a bunch of kanji. However, that being said, just learning kanji by itself is is not going to help you learn to read one bit.
You say you understand basic Japanese structure, but in another post of yours, you didn't seem to know what "shimashita" is, and didn't realize that a sentence ending in "ka" is a question. I'm not trying to insult you here -- I know that you're just starting, and everyone has to start somewhere. But these are very basic grammar points, and if you don't understand this stuff, learning all the kanji in the world isn't going to help you actually read Japanese.
I really suggest that you get a textbook (like a college textbook, not just a dictionary or phrasebook) and start reading it through from Lesson 1, page 1. I think you'd find that a lot of these questions that you have now would be answered.
P.S. regarding stroke order: "respect for the language" may be part of it, but two other ways it will help you are 1) it'll keep your handwriting legible and 2) you'll need to be able to count strokes properly if you ever want to use a kanji dictionary to look up unfamiliar characters.