Those are some pretty low numbers. So people are aware of inequality between the genders but no one really does anything about it? It'd be interesting to see the demographics of the group interviewed - I imagine it'd differ somewhat depending on age and location.Gender Equality:
- Overall: Only 16.7% believe men and women have equal status.
- Politics: 9.4% believe there's equality.
- Social Norms/Customs: 16.3% believe there's equality.
- Family Life: 30.0% believe there's equality.
- Workplace: 25.8% believe there's equality.
I never thought too deeply about it since I was also raised in a patriarchal system. My mother worked outside the home but she also did most of the cooking and housework. But certainly in Japan when I lived there 25-30 years ago, it was like that and it still is now judging by the low penetration you can see in positions of management or politics and the large number of housewives who don't work outside the home.Those of you living or having lived in Japan is this something you've experienced? I know most of you are guys but did your wives/girlfriends/daughters/coworkers ever experience anything that made you think twice? Never having lived there I don't have much but hearsay to rely on. Even my Japanese teacher, some 25 years ago, would just wring her hands apologetically and say something akin to, "things are different in Japan" when we probed her about it.
It used to be the same her, 40ish years ago, all the mothers would either work part time and take care of the family or be complete stay-at-home mothers. But women in leadership or managerial roles have really taken off the last 20 years; not least with the efforts of companies around the country wanting to have more balanced workplaces.I never thought too deeply about it since I was also raised in a patriarchal system. My mother worked outside the home but she also did most of the cooking and housework. But certainly in Japan when I lived there 25-30 years ago, it was like that and it still is now judging by the low penetration you can see in positions of management or politics and the large number of housewives who don't work outside the home.
Growing up, I thought guys behaving like that was pretty normal. I was always a bit callous about a lot of what happened to women and would have to stop myself from dismissing it with, "but that's just guys". Sure, what happened was annoying and sometimes awful but I didn't really think too much of it until #MeToo took off. About that time I was talking to a male friend who insisted not all women had 'war stories', and that #MeToo was blowing things way out of proportions. For fun I thought I'd make a list, just off the top of my head, but when I passed the first 10 bullet points ranging from guys groping my butt to someone jizzing on my handbag in a crammed Italian bus and a guy pinning me against the wall until I punched his gut, I realised that I was part of #MeToo, too. I didn't like that at all. And I live in a very safe country; I can't imagine what women elsewhere have happen to them.Even in the U.S. I'm sure almost every female has some story related to sexism or worse they could relate but they don't necessarily bring them up as a normal topic of conversation. I'm sure what you see in the news is just the tip of the iceberg.
The 29-year-old woman surnamed Hara and her mother, 62-year-old Rie Matsushima, shared a photo with a Mainichi Shimbun reporter that showed their smiling family 25 years ago. Hara, then 4 years old, was seen happily posing for the picture. Hara is the last name shared with her father and differs from her mother's. Hara and her brother, four years younger than her, were born to a couple in a common-law marriage where they kept separate surnames. The siblings grew up in the city of Saitama, north of Tokyo. Nothing about the family stood out in particular; they were a very ordinary, close-knit unit. Every year during the two long holiday periods, they would go on family trips, travelling as far as Japan's southernmost Okinawa Prefecture and northernmost Hokkaido. On usual weekends, they would go camping and eat together in nature. For family birthdays, they would always gather around a cake to celebrate.
Japanese law requires spouses to use the same family name. Women take their husband's surname about 95% of the time, according to Japan's Cabinet Office. "I think the survey shows that those who change the surnames often only do so because there's no other option," said attorney Masami Kittaka, an expert on the issue. If the option were available, 29% of respondents said they would want to go back to their original surname. Another 41% said they would not. Of them, 40% said it had been too long since they had taken their spouse's name, while 35% cited the likely hassle involved in making the switch. Unmarried respondents were asked if having the option to retain separate surnames would affect their decision whether to legally marry. While 8% of men said they would want to marry if they had the option, the figure jumped to 28% for women, reflecting greater frustration with the status quo.
A 24-year-old respondent in Tokyo opted for a common-law marriage in 2023 because she did not want to change her name. "Your name is an important part of your identity, and it's valuable at work, too," she said. "If I changed my surname, I would have to move on to the next stage of my life as a different person."
While the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan calls for introducing the option of separate surnames, conservative members of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party oppose the move, fearing it would affect traditional family values. The NGO and Yuichiro Sakai, an associate professor at Keio University specializing in family sociology, conducted the online survey in March, covering 1,600 people aged 20 to 59, with 532 of them in common-law marriages, 538 legally married and 530 single. Using the survey results and government population data, they estimated that about 1.22 million people in their 20s to 50s are in common-law relationships in Japan, with 587,000 of them wishing to marry if separate surnames are allowed.
With the small number of births out of wedlock and Japan's desire to increase the number of births, that would make the change in law a no-brainer, wouldn't it? Or does social conservatism trump common sense here?Of those, over 60% indicated they would consider formal marriage if the law permitted couples to retain separate surnames.
The illusion that the traditional idea of what makes a family, of how people want to live together is still how it is. It's the same people who don't want gay marriages and who think it's 'best for the children' that women are stay-at-home wives.It's a shame that a minority of "conservative lawmakers" so obstinately claws against something the majority of the Japanese supports. To conserve what exactly?
Just take the guys last name. It's traditional, and the guy is the head of the house, he's the alpha male (forgive the brain rot). I don't get why people feel they need to "spice things up" by arguing about what surname they should take. Having TWO surnames just makes it confusing, too.
First of all if you're meeting somebody as a couple they typically don't state their last names. It might go like this -- "this is my wife Rebecca." They don't say "I'm Jim Jones and here is Rebecca Jones." If you're meeting somebody by themselves they may say their last name when you first meet them but that wouldn't tell you if they're married or not. Assuming you have some need to know the marriage status of somebody you're meeting for the first time, their last name won't provide any additional information. And why would you even need to know if somebody is married or not when you first meet?Well, if they don't have the same name at the least, how are people gonna know they're married when they first meet? Sure, you can look at the ring (If they even use a ring, that is), but rings are small, and easy to miss. Separate surnames are even worse than having two surnames.
All of these arguments are ridiculous.Just take the guys last name. It's traditional, and the guy is the head of the house, he's the alpha male (forgive the brain rot). I don't get why people feel they need to "spice things up" by arguing about what surname they should take. Having TWO surnames just makes it confusing, too.
You asked them specifically if Japanese people should enjoy the same right that Americans have -- to pick whatever surname they want -- and they said no, Japanese people should not have that right? Anyway you've already demonstrated that your family/community seem to have no problems trying to dictate what other people should do even when it shouldn't concern you and doesn't affect you.To all the naysayers above, I asked twenty different people and they all agreed with me.
Nah, I asked if they should take the male persons name. We all think that should be the thing even here in America. Because to us (remember, we're just kids.), taking the wife's last name is like saying she's in charge.You asked them specifically if Japanese people should enjoy the same right that Americans have -- to pick whatever surname they want -- and they said no, Japanese people should not have that right? Anyway you've already demonstrated that your family/community seem to have no problems trying to dictate what other people should do even when it shouldn't concern you and doesn't affect you.
You're in one specific insular community so it's not very relevant if your community thinks one thing or another. It doesn't apply to other people.Nah, I asked if they should take the male persons name. We all think that should be the thing even here in America. Because to us (remember, we're just kids.), taking the wife's last name is like saying she's in charge.
Also… word of the day!
Edit: I asked my own MOTHER and she agreed with me.
Nobody is free to do exactly what they want. There are laws. No, I think women should take the mans last name, (except for that on exception I just listed.) keeping your last name just kinda says that you don't really care enough to take your spouses last name. It just seems disrespectful.You're in one specific insular community so it's not very relevant if your community thinks one thing or another. It doesn't apply to other people.
You should be free to do what you want as others should be free to do what they want. Why is it so difficult for you to understand and get on board with this concept?
Also the issue is not taking the wife's last name. The issue at hand is allowing the wife to keep her own name.
Of course and we have laws that allow this. Your proposal is taking away a legal right we already have.Nobody is free to do exactly what they want. There are laws. No, I think women should take the mans last name, (except for that on exception I just listed.) keeping your last name just kinda says that you don't really care enough to take your spouses last name. It just seems disrespectful.
Go through the requirements for naturalization, you'll see where im coming from. It's legally required, unless I wanna make up my own. I'm not trynna obtain permanent residence status, rather just naturalize as soon as I can. (It's a shame they don't offer dual-citizenship, don't you think)Of course and we have laws that allow this. Your proposal is taking away a legal right we already have.
I'd say it's more disrespectful to force somebody to change their name when they don't want to.
Ironically you're adding an exception for yourself yet telling everyone else what they should do. If you're proposing such a rule there should be no exception for you and the Japanese person you marry should take your name.