This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

News No dual surnames for married couples in Japan

thomas

Unswerving cyclist
Admin
Joined
14 Mar 2002
Messages
21,056
Reaction score
18,912
Despite eight years of 'womenomics' and plenty of good intentions, PM Suga yesterday admitted that Japan was "extremely behind" in promoting gender equality. The government on Friday adopted a plan that delays women's advancement goals by up to a decade after failing to reach even half of the 30% target by 2020 and other measures.


Source: Japan delays gender-equality goals in new five-year plan : The Asahi Shimbun



At the same time, conservative lawmakers reused to consider different surnames for married couples.


 
When Abe first announced his 'plan' years ago, it pissed me off. It was such blatant lip service. (There's a 50/50 chance i griped in a thread here at the time.)

if they actually do something, for example, setting up school programs which create work experience opportunities or mentor programs for girls, I'd be all for it. But just saying you're going to do better into press microphones and passing the ball up the field isn't gonna cut it
 
Marukawa Tamayo, Japan's minister for women's empowerment and gender equality, confirmed that she signed a document that opposes dual surnames for married couples and claimed her "personal belief" would not affect her duties. Marukawa is married to Taku Otsuka, a Lower House member of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party but uses her maiden name during her activities as a lawmaker.




Source: Gender-equality minister signs paper opposing dual surnames : The Asahi Shimbun



[Link removed: no longer Member of Diet.]
 
Last edited:
Japan's Supreme Court ruled that forcing married couples to choose one common surname is not unconstitutional.



Marukawa Tamayo, Japan's minister for women's empowerment and gender equality (see above), uses her maiden name in politics. Her husband's surname is Otsuka (found on JT today). Wouldn't that destroy her family unity and affect her children, too?
 
Marukawa Tamayo, Japan's minister for women's empowerment and gender equality (see above), uses her maiden name in politics. Her husband's name is Otsuka (found on JT today). Wouldn't that destroy her family unity and affect her children, too?
Only if it were allowed in official documents (戸籍). That would rip the very fabric of society apart.
 
If a couple cannot decide whose surname to take, choose by lottery or, in modern times, start an online questionnaire.



 
Movie director Kazuhiro Soda and his wife, Kiyoko Kashiwagi, married in the United States and retained their surnames. Today, their official notification of marriage to Tokyo's Chiyoda Ward office was rejected. The couple will now request the Tokyo Family Court to order the local ward authorities to accept the document. Good to see that the courts continue to be challenged.


 
This couple, who got legally married in the US, showed up to the Chiyoda Ward office with the marriage certificate in hand, and Chiyoda Ward just says, "lol, no".

I wonder what the official position is, then. Does the Japanese gov't not recognize it as a valid marriage at all? Like the US marriage license is without meaning? Does the government really claim, then, that these two people are single? Seems to raise some interesting questions.
 
This is utterly baffling to me.

The interesting thing is that (as no doubt many members of this forum know) for international marriages that take place in Japan, both husband and wife retaining their surnames is the default state, and additional paperwork is required to change one's name.

Actually, I just typed that, but I'm wondering if it's also true in the case of a non-Japanese wife marrying a Japanese husband. For the reverse, it definitely is the case. (My wife assumed she would take my last name, but was told that she would not unless a separate application was filed, which we decided not to do.)
 
Keeping up the pressure: on the occasion of International Women's Day, representatives from dozens of women's rights groups delivered a joint statement to lawmakers urging them to do more to change the 125-year-old civil code, which forces married couples to choose one surname.



 
Wife uses her family name and l use mine.

Yes, its the paradox of international couples. By default they use separate surnames, and you have to make a special application to the government if if you want to use her name, or if she wants to use yours.

It shows the ridiculousness of the Japanese government's position on this.
 
Here's an eye-opening interview Asahi conducted with Sasaki Tomoko, a former Upper House member of the Liberal Democratic Party, lawyer and prosecutor who worked to promote an optional dual-surname system. She said opposition by a particular party segment has been startlingly fierce: a refusal to listen to logic has been the biggest obstacle to progress on the issue of giving married couples the option of using separate surnames.

Her office received over 1,000 faxes, some of which said Japan would "no longer be able to retain its national polity" if dual surnames were permitted. Others said such a measure would "lead to dismantling families." Still, others called her names such as "leftist" and "unpatriotic."




I guess the non-application of logic is not restricted to dual surnames.


 
I really don't see how this is a "woman's rights" issue. Its "weird" in the West for a husband to take his wife's name. Here in Japan its fairly common and has been for a long time.

The whole "dual name" thing just sounds like people trying to be "fancy" for no practical purpose. On the one hand, I think the government should butt out. On the other hand, is there a good reason to give the bureacrats this headache? I mean, I have little compassion for those tools of the government, but, doesn't this lead to confuse about what the kids will be called? You can't just keep joining last names up forever.

I can understand why these people are just like, "For the love of Cthulu would you two just a pick a damn name and move on?"
 
Might be wrong on this but I think in most international marriages with the Japanese spouse generally speaking if it's a woman the Japanese lady maintains the Japanese passport and all the documents legal documents through the city hall are usually in the ladies maiden name then again I might be wrong but I haven't seen it otherwise personally.
 

Interesting. Some of us may be talking past eachother.

I am taking dual names to mean combining husband and wife names into something like "Smith-Tanaka" rather than operating under two separate surnames....with say one name on the passport and a different one on the driver's license.

Combining names would require a passport change no? Or is there some established standard where if one surname matches the double surname the official just accepts it with no further checking? Like if Mariko's U.S. driver's license says "Mariko Smith-Tanaka" but her Japanese passport just says "Mariko Tanaka" but she needs two forms of ID to get a credit card, the credit card company is fine with the disparity.
 
I read it as allowing them to keep their maiden name as their legal name while the husband keeps his name. The current law forces the couple to pick one or the other. But re-reading it it's not entirely clear to me now.
 
I had to read this twice to grasp the impact: Keidanren, Japan's most prominent business group, urged the Japanese government to enact a dual-surname option, saying that the current system mandating a shared surname hinders corporate activities.


The Justice Ministry's Legislative Council proposed revising the Civil Law in 1996 to allow married couples to maintain separate surnames. However, the proposal was met with strong opposition within the Liberal Democratic Party, which prevented its submission to the Diet until now. Japan is the only country legally requiring married couples to have the same surname. The government has been allowing maiden names to be included on driver's licenses and other documents. Still, the business community has indicated that this allowance has not spread to the international business arena.

 
As I recall, when I got married in Japan, as a foreigner marrying a Japanese national, it was merely a matter of adding my name to her koseki record. I chose to take on her family name (since changed back to the original), although I was under no obligation to do so. I wanted to make life easy on any potential future children. I think that we never got around to updating my name on her koseki, though. That meant that when we got a divorce, I had to do so under my 'maiden' name, as that was the one listed on the koseki.

My current wife and I have separate last names, which we did because she has an established career. Changing her name to mine would cause her a lot of trouble professionally. Conversely, I am theoretically open to changing my name to her family's name, but there is no need. Also, I've changed my name twice now. It's a lot of hassle.

Also, apparently in China it's common for husbands and wives to have different surnames. Even though they have a family registry system similar to Japan. When they have a child, though, I am told it is customary for the child to take the husband's family name.

Although interestingly, my younger brother married a woman from Taiwan, and I guess that there he is officially part of her family after doing some kind of registration at a government office somewhere. I'm sorry to be so fuzzy, but I really don't know the details. What I do know is that due to this, he is allowed to visit the family grave, but she is not. I don't really understand it either, but this is what I'm told by them.
 
A class-action lawsuit has been filed by a group of 12 individuals with the district courts of Tokyo and Sapporo. Their aim is to challenge the constitutionality of legal provisions that mandate married couples to share the same surnames. This issue has been raised before, leading to separate Supreme Court rulings in 2015 and 2021, affirming that the requirement aligns with the Constitution. However, the lawyers representing the plaintiffs in the latest lawsuit emphasize that the situation has evolved. Lobbyists actively advocate for an amendment, and public opinion appears to favour abandoning the existing rule. Among the 12 plaintiffs, there are five common-law couples and one married couple. These individuals reside in Tokyo, Hokkaido, and Nagano prefectures. A 2022 survey by the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research revealed that 61% of respondents support the idea of couples having separate surnames. This represents an increase from 50.5% in 2018 and 41.5% in 2013.







Japan Couples Sue to End Surname Law, This Time With Business Backing
 
Japan it was Japanese people do don't bring your stupid *** I'm better than the Japanese government so if you're going to listen to what I say not with the Japanese government feels best for the Japanese people all that come through Japan that want to put their their feelings over the Japanese culture they can really go take a **** in the outhouse in the backyard mask t
 
The heat is up: Kagawa Prefecture has achieved a significant milestone by becoming Japan's first prefecture, where all local assemblies have unanimously passed a statement advocating for national legislation allowing married couples to choose separate surnames. This progressive move reflects the growing momentum in favour of granting couples the freedom to retain their family names after marriage.

As of 19 March, the Kagawa Prefectural Assembly and all 17 municipal assemblies within the prefecture have formally adopted this statement. Their collective voice emphasizes the importance of addressing the issue at the national level. The call extends beyond Kagawa, as a total of 383 local assemblies across Japan had already expressed similar sentiments by January of this year. The debate surrounding separate surnames has been ongoing for years, and this concerted effort by Kagawa Prefecture adds weight to the conversation. Advocates argue that allowing couples to maintain distinct surnames promotes individual autonomy, gender equality, and personal identity. It also aligns with global trends and recognizes the diverse ways in which families define themselves. While the road to legislative change remains challenging, Kagawa's resolute stance sends a powerful message: the time has come to reevaluate and modernize marital naming conventions.




 
Keidanren (the Japan Business Federation) and Keizai Doyukai (the Japan Association of Corporate Executives) continue to push the issue, heightening calls for Japan to allow married couples to choose separate surnames. This would reflect the increasing number of women in management and executive posts. They criticized the mandatory single-surname system for "hindering business processes."




 
Japan's unique Civil Code provisions requiring joint surnames for married couples may face constitutional challenges due to evolving court interpretations of discrimination. Former Supreme Court Justice Ryuko Sakurai, who dissented in a 2015 case upholding the current laws, argued that the provisions denying dual surnames are unconstitutional. She personally experienced professional setbacks when unable to use her maiden name, "Fujii," in her work.





 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…