Dogen Z
aka YOSUQUE
- 23 Apr 2007
- 1,072
- 22
Prime Minister Fukuda has told the press that a higher consumption tax is inevitable, although not for next year, to pay for Japan's huge fiscal deficit (i.e., internal or government debt) estimated to be from 96-147% of GDP depending on your source. This debt was accumulated during the "lost decade" when the government tried to buy it's way out of economic collapse following the bubble era--in other words, building bridges to nowhere. Now, the government wants the taxpayer to pay for its folly...the latest tax reform proposal lessens corporate taxes in, I think, an effort to follow global standards. Therefore, consumption tax may rise from 5% to about 7% or even 10%!
I think there is another good options than raising the people's taxes and making life more costly in Japan. I think Paul Krugman of MIT already suggested this but it was for the banking non-performing loan mess. The government should simply monetize the debt, i.e. print more money to pay off the debt. This has the problem of bringing inflation but Japan still risks the problem of falling into deflation as shown by the last 2 quarterly cpi measurments.
Has the government thought about this option? If not, why not? Why all the talk about having us pay for it without a thorough debate about options?
If it needs a consultant, I can be had for a, ahem, slight fee. 
I think there is another good options than raising the people's taxes and making life more costly in Japan. I think Paul Krugman of MIT already suggested this but it was for the banking non-performing loan mess. The government should simply monetize the debt, i.e. print more money to pay off the debt. This has the problem of bringing inflation but Japan still risks the problem of falling into deflation as shown by the last 2 quarterly cpi measurments.
Has the government thought about this option? If not, why not? Why all the talk about having us pay for it without a thorough debate about options?