I hope this is not a stab at the highly informative blog of Japan's chief human rights activist...I'd imagine the sites I posted, which you're free to investigate at your leisure of course, are 'reasonable', certainly not anyone's blog or diary.
Prints rejected, scribe accepted
T he center of the little monitor ツ― I'd guess about 20 cm from the looks of it ツ― flashed the word "Yokoso" (welcome). Its colored border was festooned with a collage of images near and dear to visiting tourists' hearts: "torii" gates, the shinkansen, Zen gardens, Mount Fuji . . .
"Please place your fingers on the pad," ordered the immigration officer from behind the counter...
The green lights beside my fingers changed to red. Something was not working properly.
"Um, I can't seem to get a clear reading off your fingers," he said, popping open a container of premoistened finger wipes. "Please use this to clean them and try again..."
"Well, anyway, let's take a picture," he grimaced, standing up and tilting the camera angle upwards to accommodate my 189 cm height...
But wait a minute: My prints didn't take. Why wasn't I dragged off into a separate room and interrogated? Why, after all the fuss, was I simply admitted on the strength of my passport, status of residence and re-entry permit?...
Read the whole article
I hope this is not a stab at the highly informative blog of Japan's chief human rights activist...
All aboard the FUD train...
The program is NOT the same as the US program - the Japanese program requires permanent residents and residents with working permits to give their fingerprints, while the US program requires only visitors (Tourists) to give their prints.
Police records check
Consent to obtain personal information
http://www.immi.gov.au/allforms/pdf/1101.pdf
Police Certificate: Each visa applicant 16 years and older must submit a certificate from the appropriate police authorities. This certificate should provide any information contained in police files concerning the applicant. All applicants must obtain a police certificate from their country of nationality, and the country of present residence if the applicant has resided there for six months or more. Applicants must also obtain police certificates from all countries where he/she resided for one year or more.
http://tokyo.usembassy.gov/e/visa/tvisa-ivinterviewcheck2.html
Ask, and ye shall receive.Glenski, quote it here, please.
I think this is more offensive than the fingerprint.Police Certificate: Each visa applicant 16 years and older must submit a certificate from the appropriate police authorities.
Human rights organisations say it violates foreigners' rights to privacy and could encourage xenophobia.
BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | Japan ups checks for foreigners
pipokun,Quoteolice Certificate: Each visa applicant 16 years and older must submit a certificate from the appropriate police authorities.
I think this is more offensive than the fingerprint.
Did the embassy of Japan request similar documents from you?
One of the reasons I want to stay away from crimes is the above, for many countries requres the documents.
The language skill is much harder hurdle for Japanese including me, though.
I am just curious how many Britons could pass the IELTS 6.5/5.5 or how many Japanese could pass the JLPT Level 1/2.
New Long-Term Residency Requirements: Prove you're not a criminal even overseas | debito.orgNew Long-Term Residency Requirements: Prove you're not a criminal even overseas
Posted by debito on November 1st, 2007
–HELLO BLOG. QUOTING A RECENT EXCHANGE ON THE COMMUNITY REGARDING HOW THINGS ARE TIGHTENING UP FOR PEOPLE WHO WANT TO LENGTHEN THEIR VISAS HERE IN JAPAN:
///////////////////////////////////////////////////
October 4, 2007
Hello, Does anyone have any more information about this new (I think) development? What do they mean by long-term residents? Anyone who is not a tourist? Does it include permanent residents?
===============================
New Long Term Residency Requirements: Japan recently modified its Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act. The law now requires that long-term residents provide satisfactory evidence that they do not have a criminal record in their home country when renewing their resident card. To obtain such proof, U.S. citizens with long-term resident status in Japan need to contact the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and provide it with a copy of their fingerprints. To request such service, please follow the guidance listed here. For more details about the Japanese requirements, check with the nearest immigration office in Japan,
http://www.moj.go.jp/ENGLISH/information/ib-09.html
Source:
U.S. Department of State
Consular Information Sheet: Japan
404 - Page Not Found
===============================
I am getting really annoyed at being treated like a criminal what with all this fingerprinting. We seemed to be moving nicely away from that trend in recent years with the fingerprints being removed from our Alien Registration Cards. I am feeling distinctly unwelcome in the country I have called home for ten of the past twelve years… Shaney.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////
I called immigration just now. I talked with a wise lady who has been at Nagoya immigration ever since I applied for my first visa extension over 12 years ago, she advised me when I got my first marriage visa, and my permanent visa. She also advised me when I wanted to sponsor a friend for permanent residence. So far she's never steered me wrong.
She was completely baffled by me calling and said *I* personally have absolutely nothing to worry about, no one will be asking for my FBI records.
I tried to explain to her, I wasn't necessarily concerned for myself but wanted to know if anyone else might have to at some point provide such FBI records. She said the only people she was aware of that required records from the FBI were American nikkeijin. She said this was indeed a new law, and that must be what the US state department is talking about. Even here, I think it might have only been third generation Americans that needed FBI records.
I found this requirement on the web, here it is:
法務省
Now, I read her in English what was at the State Departments site, and explained it in Japanese as well. She could not make any sense of the idea that I would have to provide FBI documents merely to renew my gaikokujin toroku sho. (Gaijin card). She said that didn't make any sense to her as it has nothing to do with your visa.
That was that. She could be in error.
I think most big changes in immigration law are generally posted here:
出入国在留管理庁ホームページ
I looked there and could not find anything about needing FBI records. I will have a second look.
If anyone else looks into this, I would be interested in what they find out.
Best,
Matt Dioguardi
///////////////////////////////////////////////////
1) "Long term resident (teijusha)" is one of 27 Status of Residence (visa) categories.
The word "long term" is just a translation of "teiju" and has nothing to do with the validity of the Status of Residence nor the number of years you have lived in Japan. It's just a name of the Status of Residence. So some have three year "long term resident" and others have one year "long term resident" on their passport. You can even obtain "long term residence" on arrival if you have a corresponding Certificate of Eligibility.
"Permanent Resident (eijusha, or eijuken)" is another Status of Residence. It is different from "Long term resident."
Below is a list of all 27 Status of Residence categories. It has been like this for about 20 years, nothing new.
http://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/hourei/data/icrra.pdf ( p71 - 76, teijusha at the bottom )
2) However, the requirements for each Status of Residence have changed frequently. Part of it is stricter requirements for "Long term resident" because of, I think, recent crimes by the Japanese descendents (nikkei) with "Long term resident" Status of Residence who came to Japan with false documents or criminal records in home country (police clearance was not required back then.)
Not all "Long term resident" holders are required to submit police clearance, but only Japanese descendents (nikkei) and their spouse.
The new requirements below. (Only in Japanese) The phrase "sokou ga zenryou dearu mono = those whose behavior and conduct are good" was recently added to Item 3, 4, 5, 6 (i.e. requirement categories for Japanse descendents and their spouse), and is the legal basis for requiring police clearance.法務省
出入国在留管理庁ホームページ
3) The new requirements themselves have nothing to do with "gaijin card" or alien registration card.
Akira HIGUCHI
////////////////////////////////////////////
COMMENT: THEN I WONDER WHY THE US EMBASSY WAS CONTACTING ITS AMERICANS ABOUT THIS IF IT'S BASICALLY ONLY PERTINENT TO NIKKEI TEIJUU? HERE WE GO AGAIN WITH YET ANOTHER BUNCH OF MISUNDERSTANDINGS ABOUT A NEW LAW IN PRACTICE AND ON PAPER? ARUDOU DEBITO IN SAPPORO
Because the US has, let's say, an 80-90% probability of further international terrorism within it's borders while Japan has maybe a 0-.02% chance of it happening even once on home soil. Why aren't these procedures being applied domestically ? The only attacks ever committed in that country have come from their own people.
Nikkei visa is more lucrative and easier as you know. And it is natural after the horrible pedophile crimes. You can understand the feeling if you are from the country of Megan's and Jessica's Law.
The criminal record requirement is nothing unusual. I think it is offensive, but it is an effective measure not to worsen the xenophobia.
The government should enforce it to all visa applicants like your country, European nations, or Asian nations. Those countries are supposed to be less xenophobic than Japan, right?
*snip*
I am against the bloodline visa privilage, though I have nikkei friends.
I am against the special permanent resident loophole of some Korean and Taiwanse people about the fingerprint.
This is ludicrous! Why are you promoting any priority at all?All nikkei should be given full Japanese citizenship before Japan accepts naturalization of complete foreigners.
Priority I propose
1) Those who were born in Japan who are full blooded.
2) Those who were born abroad to Japanese parents (both)
3) Those who are third generation full blood
Then those of mixed ancestry should be considered.
Even more ludicrous. You want to somehow exercise some control over a person's human right to choose citizenship now by forbidding them to take another country's nationality if he or she chooses. Apparently the only reason you give is to prevent a decline in the birth rate...? I don't follow this logic at all.Then those of mixed ancestry should be considered. But Japanese born in Japan, should be allowed dual nationality, but never given the right to however exercise the rights of his or her second citizenship.
I am not familiar with what India did, but if a child is born to at least one Japanese parent abroad, that child can be put on the J parent's family register as well as be considered a citizen of the foreign country. At age 22, the child must then choose. So, the process is already there.If this isn't possible, they need to make a Japanese Nationality (Overseas) like India did
Just his personal opinion, isn't it?
If his opinion were the official UN statement, please ask him to show off his opinon somewhere, preferably in the UN website. I want to do it, but you are the right guy with your English skill.
He should, at least, tackle with the trafic jam problem in NY now.
If the measure were for the gaijin with North Korean gaijin looks, it must be the xenophobia.
Stupid Japanese drug smugglers have been sentenced to death in an Asian country.
Stupid Asian drug smagglers have been arrested in Osaka, and they will be in jail for 10 years or so.
This is ludicrous! Why are you promoting any priority at all?
Even more ludicrous. You want to somehow exercise some control over a person's human right to choose citizenship now by forbidding them to take another country's nationality if he or she chooses. Apparently the only reason you give is to prevent a decline in the birth rate...? I don't follow this logic at all.
I am not familiar with what India did, but if a child is born to at least one Japanese parent abroad, that child can be put on the J parent's family register as well as be considered a citizen of the foreign country. At age 22, the child must then choose. So, the process is already there.
Just found this interesting article that I wanted to share with you guys:
So perhaps they should start photographing and fingerprinting every Japanese person too - this was what I understood from Glenski's posts.
I'm quite happy about these new procedures now that I know I'll get my 'own' queue. Would I be correct in assuming that Green Card holders get fingerprinted but nevertheless line up with US Citizens at immigration control?
--
That is such a ridiculous question that I can't even think of a polite way to answer.
What gets me is that people have to do this every time they enter or leave the country. Aren't they supposedly storing this information somewhere? I'd march down to my local town hall, offer up my ten digits and flash my pearly whites tomorrow if it meant avoiding long lines at the airport.
I do agree with Ewok's and similar opinions. Here are two debito entries on the matter:
Something interesting and important for every non-Japanese who is going to go to Japan;
When entering the country, you will have to from now on give your fingerprints, and have your picture taken at the immigration.