The definition of "word" in Japanese is very fuzzy. There are many cases when it would be equally true to regard some characters as both two consecutive words with kanji and one compound word.When reading, is it possible to determine if two consecutive kanji are part of a compound or just two consecutive words?
グレッグさん はじめまして。どうぞ宜しくお願いします。今晩は。私はゴレグです。日本語を習うこといます。
今、日本語を書くこと初めています。私が分かるできる?
Did that make any sense? Did I kana-ize my name correctly? Were my particles ok? In the fourth sentence, did I need to include 日本語 as a direct object of the こと phrase or can it be omitted?
One more thing - In the last sentence I said
私が分かるできる?
not
分かりましたか?
The second one (Elizabeth's correction) is better -
do you understand me, instead of can you understand me.
So when is できる appropriate? Is it only used with こと phrases?
Ex: 魚を食べることできるか? (Can you eat fish?)
ありがと! Man you guys are great, I'm learning more just from this thread than a whole day of reading grammar lessons(Noun) ができる
or
(verb) ことができる
but not
(verb) できる
Don't forget the が!
I said 'noun' but obviously not anything works. You can't say 車ができる but you can say 運転ができる. 運転 is what's known as a (vs) - 'suru verb' in WWWJDIC.
運転 【うんてん】 (n,vs) operation; motion; driving; (P)
運転する to drive
運転ができる to be able to drive
返事をありがとう!ありがとうございます!
I appreciate all of your comments! (Oh I wish I could express that in Japanese! Soon)
Elizabeth: I'm trying to translate you. You said: 上手にかけていると思いますよ。
Nonetheless, I get the idea of the sentence. A nice compliment, so in Japanese I guess a modest response would be in order.
Idiomatic: nice explanation but just be careful with your terminology. A gerund is a noun. What you meant there was a 'present progressive verb' instead of gerund. Your second example using こと is a gerund.
Yep, that's right.Greg777 said:wow elizabeth! you like to challenge the poor beginners, huh?
返事をありがとう!
Thanking me for replying?
Elizabeth was pointing out that it should be 「上手ではありません」 (the contracted form 「上手じゃありません」 would also be okay) instead of 「上手がありません」, as you originally wrote.Greg777 said:いいえ、まだ上手ではありません。
ええ、 わかりました。 でも、"がいいですね。"は分かりません。
In quoting you, is は the correct particle to use after your phrase?
Closer to "I'll try rephrasing this in a simpler (easier-to-understand) way." The -ku form of the adjective 分かりやすい is basically an adverbial usage, describing the manner in which something will be done.Greg777 said:you said-
分かり易く言い換えてみます。 (-edit, had the wrong sentence pasted here initially)
(trying to say this is difficult for me to understand)
I think you said "It will be easier to understand if I put it another way"?
「難しく分かります」 would literally mean something like "I understand this difficult-ly." (not intended to make sense)Greg777 said:これは難しく分かります。
This would mean something like "Thanks for everyone!", with 「を」 marking _what_ you're saying thanks for. (Note that it's the same pattern as Elizabeth's 「返事をありがとう」 above.)Greg777 said:みんなをありがと!
I won't go into the details, but some schools of Japanese pedagogy (most notably Jordan's Japanese: the Spoken Language) do indeed refer to the -te form of verbs as "the gerund." While you're correct that the verb+koto construction is closer to what we call a "gerund" in English grammar, I've never heard it referred to as such in a Japanese textbook.Bucko said:Idiomatic: nice explanation but just be careful with your terminology. A gerund is a noun. What you meant there was a 'present progressive verb' instead of gerund. Your second example using こと is a gerund.
Bucko - this firefox plugins rules, saves me lots of time in translation
The sentences are simple and, at the right level, the vocab and grammar forms are also very straightforward. Easy readers are very much like in the West -- more similar to Curious George or Dick and Jane than Snow White orOh yeah, and I don't really recommend childrens books. The sentences might be simple, but they're simple for Japanese children, not necessarily the Japanese learner. Think about all the childrens books you use to read, with magic wands and princesses and dragons etc. If you really want to start reading I recommend getting a text book like Genki. They have reading exercises and sometimes it's pretty interesting.
毎日、いつでも フリーレッスン !!!ありがと! Man you guys are great, I'm learning more just from this thread than a whole day of reading grammar lessons
The -ku form of the adjective 分かりやすい is basically an adverbial usage, describing the manner in which something will be done.
It may be a bit difficult to understand at this very early stage in your studies, but to give a very basic illustrative example:
「難しい」, as you know, is an adjective that means "difficult."
「難しくします」, would mean "[I'll] make it difficult."
「難しくなります」 would mean "[It will] become difficult."
「難しく分かります」 would literally mean something like "I understand this difficult-ly." (not intended to make sense)
If you want to say it's difficult to understand, I'd suggest:
「これは分かりにくいです。」 (the ~にくい form is the opposite of the ~やすい form -- difficult-to-X and easy-to-X, respectively)
...or you could say:
「これは難しくて分かりません。」 (literally, "This is difficult and I don't understand it.")
毎日、いつでも フリーレッスン !!!Please return to our site soon and often.
じゃあ、またね!
Hmm... I'm not entirely sure what you're getting at here. Yes, "understanding" would be a noun (理解/rikai), and you could say something like 理解が難しい, but the most natural way to say something is difficult to understand is 分かりにくい (for example, 「ちょっと分かりにくいです」, which is an adjective (or an "i-adjective", as it's called in many textbooks.)Greg777 said:Right, I get it. I was thinking I needed to use difficult as an adverb to modify the verb understand, but it was "my understanding of it" which was difficult, which is a noun right?
Grammatically, this is fine, but in more natural Japanese, you're probably more likely to hear 「すぐ分かりました」.Greg777 said:But I could say something like 速く分かりました。
ここにいましょう (<- note that the ょ is a small one) is a 'volitional' form that would mean something like "Let's stay around here!" (it sounds a bit odd used together with もちろん, too...) It would probably be more natural to say something like 「もちろん、また来ますよ」, meaning "Of course, I'll come back (visit this forum) again."Greg777 said:もちろん、ここにいましようよ!またね
I would imagine you could also use 覚える in the sense of "pick up on" or "catch on to" in the past tense as すぐに(自然に)覚えてしまった。But I'm not completely certain. I've also only personally used jt_san's suggestion of すぐわかった。
Grammatically, this is fine, but in more natural Japanese, you're probably more likely to hear 「すぐ分かりました」
覚える is different from わかる.I would imagine you could also use 覚える in the sense of "pick up on" or "catch on to" in the past tense as すぐに(自然に)覚えてしまった。But I'm not completely certain. I've also only personally used jt_san's suggestion of すぐわかった。
ここにいましょう (<- note that the ょ is a small one) is a 'volitional' form that would mean something like "Let's stay around here!" (it sounds a bit odd used together with もちろん, too...) It would probably be more natural to say something like 「もちろん、また来ますよ」, meaning "Of course, I'll come back (visit this forum) again."
Yes, I was concerned also that 覚える (おぼえてしまった、覚えられた)be used for someone that was able to quickly memorize the various 難しい conjugations (難しくなる、難しくする)without perhaps understanding the underlying concept that the grammar reflects. And truth be known, I didn't know exactly what @Greg san himself was referring to in the earlier post...So forget this if it's too confusing,覚える is different from わかる.
わかる is to express comprehension while 覚える means to learn and remember something.
e.g.
この単語がわかった。
I understood this word (= what it means).
この単語を覚えた。
I learned this word and memorized (= now I can use it and is able to answer if someone asked for its meaning).
車の運転がわかった。
I understood how to drive a car. (But I'm not necessarily be able to drive it actually.)
車の運転を覚えた。
I learned how to drive a car. (So I can drive.)
So in this case what you usually say and what jt san suggested i.e.
すぐわかりました is most appropriate.