Zero-sen said:I have quite a bit of Tameshigiri experience and i have tried this with both my own katana ( the tiger by Paul Chen ), and with the Hanwei forge western blades. Whilst they are in no way near the quality of the older blades (This is in no way to disrespect Mr Chen, his blades are excellent), This does give a real sense of what you're up against.
newbee9181 said:no way im willing to spend good money for these swords, but i have no clue if paul chen swords are any good and need opinion and input on this.
but thanks for the heads up shooter.
btw do u like ur paul chen swords. are they pretty good???
and what about last legend swords are they good too??
newbee9181 said:thanks for the input shooter. i would definetly look into to paul chens swords. i think i might get the folded orchid or the folded bushido sets. i like those swords. i have been serching the net and doing research and i think it would be good to get one of his peices.
thanks again shooter
jack84 said:I'm writeing this just to clarifiy a few facts. I hope thats ok with you guys.
What distinguishes japan's swords from most is the fact that they are made in a style resembeling a damascues blade. A piece of very strong metal is brought and is melted when it has completly melted it is then straightened into a long bar and than pounded on it self to make it bend into layers. from there it is pounded again to make it into three layers and the process goes on as much as the sword maker wants it to be. The thickest blades are usally made to 2 to the power of 3 or was it to the power of five sorry cant really remeber the number exactly but it is between these powers. This made the sword very resistent to breaking while making it very functional yet it is rare and very expensive to find a sword with the thickness talked about in the above. The sword was made to withstand a lot of abuse due to the fact that although the japans wore armor in battle the armor was made of raw treated hide and a well placed blow would easily split it this was due to the fact of the shortage of iron ores in japan and although the battles are not what they show in the movies but when you have to master that have train on the sword for 10 to 15 years the battle will atleast take more than 5 minutes. Also about testing the blades by cutting a human body it is not really testing the blade it was actually a process used to cool the sword for the final time. it is belived that by doing that a sword cans the will to actually seek blood since it has been implanted into it from the moment of making it but this was a rare process and was only used against criminals. The most number of people used for this process were five, the sword would be passed through five people while it was hot to cool it down but usally it was less and was rarly done. hope somone finds this information useful in anyway
jack84 said:I'm writeing this just to clarifiy a few facts. I hope thats ok with you guys.
What distinguishes japan's swords from most is the fact that they are made in a style resembeling a damascues blade. A piece of very strong metal is brought and is melted when it has completly melted it is then straightened into a long bar and than pounded on it self to make it bend into layers. from there it is pounded again to make it into three layers and the process goes on as much as the sword maker wants it to be. The thickest blades are usally made to 2 to the power of 3 or was it to the power of five sorry cant really remeber the number exactly but it is between these powers. This made the sword very resistent to breaking while making it very functional yet it is rare and very expensive to find a sword with the thickness talked about in the above. The sword was made to withstand a lot of abuse due to the fact that although the japans wore armor in battle the armor was made of raw treated hide and a well placed blow would easily split it this was due to the fact of the shortage of iron ores in japan and although the battles are not what they show in the movies but when you have to master that have train on the sword for 10 to 15 years the battle will atleast take more than 5 minutes. Also about testing the blades by cutting a human body it is not really testing the blade it was actually a process used to cool the sword for the final time. it is belived that by doing that a sword cans the will to actually seek blood since it has been implanted into it from the moment of making it but this was a rare process and was only used against criminals. The most number of people used for this process were five, the sword would be passed through five people while it was hot to cool it down but usally it was less and was rarly done. hope somone finds this information useful in anyway
Shooter452 said:They are indeed of high quality. Master Chen makes excellent edged weapons of various quality, but the folded steel weapons are as good as any found outside Japan. His forge is located in the PRC. He--as I stated before--uses the maru-gitae method of sword craft that is designed to mass produce weapons of uniform quality for worthy vassels. It is not the method one would use to produce the very highest quality swords when price is not an issue. Swords such as those of makuri-gitae style, are priceless works of art that are declared national treasures by the Japanese and are unavailable at any amount of money.
I am very proud of my daisho. My Tiger katana is in fact the first that was sold in the USA and the same one that is displayed at the Sword Armory website. Go to http://www.swordarmory.com/katanas/1204gt.htm to view my sword and the prices on the set of Tiger weapons.
It holds a fine, sharp edge, but I must admit the I have yet to kill anyone with it in combat, so it has not been abused at all. The true mark of a Japanese sword is that it is resilient in combat. Short of that, I can vouch for them.
The workmanship is first rate and done totally by hand (no machining goes into any of his folded-steel swords). That is why they are so damned expensive.
I hope that helps.
PS: Last-Legend weapons have sterling reputation. I cannot say more since I own none of them.
The add does not say if they are folded blades or not. Not all of Paul Chen's blades are folded steel. These are certainly maru-gitae method swords because of the tempering process, so they are of certain quality.alke said:personally, i'm looking at the Miyamoto Musashi daisho set orientalweapons.com
It does? Gee, I musta missed it. I am careless and hasty that way sometimes.alke said:actually, i've seen other ads with them, that say they are, that one just had a good picture
30th Anniversary Musashi Katana - Historical Reference - Currently Unavailable
i think that one says it is
While I will review the suggested sources, I have been counciled by a former member of the US Department of State that all war-trophy swords collected by returning US servicemen from the Second World War in the Pacific are advised to be returned to Japan. As this is not a requirement and these swords are not prohibted by private ownership here (yet), his advice was that these weapons may have some historical significance to the Japanese.gokarosama said:Japanese war swords, or the swords made for officers to wear, are called "gunto" and in terms of the NBTHK are generally not considered worthy of recognition as art swords. In fact, they are illegal to own in Japan (since they do not qualify as "art" they are thus only weapons) and upon confiscation are destroyed.
The steel used to make these swords was quite often of a much lower quality than that used in swords of earlier periods or made using traditional methods. Many of the WW II officer swords were also mass-produced by machine rather than hand-forged.
This is not to say the swords are not worth having. One man's junk is another man's treasure. They would probably be interesting as historical artifacts if nothing else.
You can find a much more detailed discussion of these type swords at Rich Stein's site (which is incidentally linked to by Mandylion in his main Q & A post here and here.