Yeah, I, too, want to hear his opinion if he really can tell us the points where he disagrees with in my posts, and can explain the reasons. Hope this is not his another "personal attacks".@DavidChiang I noticed you disagreed with some explanations. Care to pitch in?
I think I confused it with で as in:一番上 means "oldest" here. These words related to "one's age" are connected to nouns with の.
Nope. I'll look it up.#10-5
Have you learned ~と同じ?
A は B
結婚した is a verb. That's the point.I think I confused it with で as in:
母は二十五歳で結婚した
(2)一番上 means "oldest" here. These words related to "one's age" are connected to nouns with の.
So に then?#11-2
下 is treated like a location here.
The only conjunctive particle I know of is が.5
a conjunctive particle
Normally that's と but there's no action of talking being mentioned here. There's only the です copula as opposed to the previous times where various forms of6
Talking about him (= Shinji)
Ok.This の is not apposition. きみ子さん and 下 doesn't refers to the same thing/person, unlike ご主人の黒川さん or 奥さんの昭子さん. Also notice the word order is opposite. The proper noun must be put after の for apposition.
下 に... well there are two verbs in the sentence. The copula at the verb end as well as います. I don't know with which one 下に is associated with.2
Yes, it's に. This に doesn't indicate the direction. See what the verb used with に is.
Ah ha! Ok. Would it be fair to say that the ひらがな variety is used in that aspect ("to be called").3
いう doesn't mean "to say" here. Indeed it originally came from the verb 言う, but ~という means "called/named" as a set.
It's a copula. Ok, I see why で doesn't work then.#12-2
いる/いた is not an action.
It was と. Ok so it's mutual so it's not just one person being the indirect object.4
に is wrong here. 文通 is a mutual action. Do you understand the difference between 彼に話す and 彼と話す?
When the predicate is "noun + copula", it's a noun sentence and the structure is just "Noun A は/が Noun B だ." に is not used in noun sentences except when the noun preceding copula (= Noun B) expresses an action, e.g., 委員長は彼に決定だ or 彼は国外に追放だ. These nouns are considered to represent verbs, 決定する and 追放する respectively, so you can think these are exceptions. Thus, に is connected to います.下 に... well there are two verbs in the sentence. The copula at the verb end as well as います. I don't know with which one 下に is associated with.
Mostly yes, but kanji is also sometimes used.Would it be fair to say that the ひらがな variety is used in that aspect ("to be called").
いる/いた is not copula, either.It's a copula. Ok, I see why で doesn't work then.
The indirect object is just one person きみ子さん. "Mutual" refers to the speaker/subject and the person.It was と. Ok so it's mutual so it's not just one person being the indirect object.
"One person" is the speaker/subject.In your examples, in the former, one person is talking
先週 "Last week" and 日曜日 "Sunday" don't have the same referent, right? The same goes to きみ子さん and 下.Regarding apposition:
a relationship between two or more words or phrases in which the two units are grammatically parallel and have the same referent (e.g., my friend Sue ; the first US president, George Washington.)
I googled for a list. What are the case particles:3, 4
も is put after case particles.
I thought a copula was the same thing as a stative verb. So yes, "to exist" isn't a copula.いる/いた is not copula, either.
Ok, it's logical.Thus, に is connected to います.
You mean a dependent indefinite pronoun? That's the only entry I have in my dictionary.の is a pronoun, representing "Disneyland".
You mean this:This と is not "and". It's the same usage of と as AはBと同じだ, as I explained in #10-5.
There was no 同じ in #14 so I didn't recognize it.Have you learned ~と同じ?
A は B と同じだ
A is the same as B.
二番目のお嬢さんは、わたしと同じ年です。
The second daughter is the same age as me.
Just to be clear, すし屋 is also valid, but さん is often applied to shops/professions as a general expression of politeness. It's a rather common construction (you'll also see 本屋さん, 八百屋さん, etc.) and sounds cultured/polite (and not really funny at all) to native speakers. (The お in おすし is similar honorific/politeness prefix you'll often find before お金, お酒, etc. This usage is so frequent that it's actually probably the more common form of the word, with the version without "お" sounding more "rough".)Zizka said:(3)おすし屋さん is a place. It's funny. I thought it'd be すし屋.
There are several ways of classification, but case particles usually refer to が, を, に, へ, と, で, から, まで and より. I used the term "case particles" instead of just "particles" since some particles are attached after も, such like sentence final particles さ, ね or な. I should have used "most particles" since exceptions are not so many (i.e., も is usually attached after other particles).I googled for a list. What are the case particles:
で, と, から... this is based on your examples. I couldn't find a list online. If I know which ones are the case particles I'll know which particles can be used in combination with も.
*
So the "case" when it comes to grammar, what is it exactly?
Source:
Case is the grammatical function of a noun or pronoun. There are only three cases in modern English, they are subjective (he), objective (him) and possessive (his).
How does it relate to Japanese more precisely? Do you mean particles which are used to indicate the possessive like の and so on?
そっくり has a similar usage as 同じ just like their meanings.There was no 同じ in #14 so I didn't recognize it.
Yes, that's right. It's the same と as the one in 彼と話す or ~とかくれんぼをする.I'm trying to associate that function from one of my reference books.
Could it be:
A particle marking the NP which maintains a reciprocal relationship with the subject of a clause.
In this case, the one in America being linked with the Disneyworld in Japan. (talking about the と).
I think that sounds about right.
If it's も, would it mean: "There were also people singing songs?"(7), (8), (11) Your answers here are valid and should be correct.
Right.I guess it's を as the direct of singing, so "singing songs".
Exactly.If it's も, would it mean: "There were also people singing songs?"