Stinger said:
This isn't directed at you, personally, but...
I really wish people would quit beating a dead horse about this crap. Christ. I'm starting to wish we would just pull out and let the country rip itself apart just so I can stop hearing people blathering on about it.
This has to do with " structural differences " of European and Japanese monarchies.
European monarchies have their roots in the military. The feudal European monarchies were essentially militaristic in nature, and more similar to the
samurai class structure. Japan, unlike the West, had a separate caste of administrators and courtly nobles who stuck around. However, with the establishment of the office of
shogun, they became politically impotent. As a result, they were evolved to be much more authoritarian.
Japanese Emperors " never ruled " politically or philosophically through out much of Japan's history,except for one notable 7th century Emperor XXXtakashi ( 673-686 ) with utmost executive powers during his reign
Actually, there were some emperors who did have a great deal of power, which they exercised through religion. That's why many retired Emperors who lived in Buddhist monasteries still pulled strings back in the court at
Kyoto.
If you really want a Western analogy, the Catholic Church hierarchy and its relationship to a European king/emperor is kind of like the Japanese emperor's relationship to the
shogun, in theory. In practice, well, the pope was pretty damn powerful, and sometimes the shogun could outright refuse the emperor's bidding.