Putrefaction
不幸中の幸い. . . がない.
- 7 Nov 2008
- 905
- 24
- Thread starter
-
- #851
with の added when expressing this general timeframe (usually in one's past).
Other uses of koro/goro (with different meanings) may not be followed by の
食べごろ:Just the right time to eat [the food, being perfectly ripe, etc.].
二時ごろ:Around 2 o'clock
Ichiji-goro and niji-goro are correct. They are never used with "--koro."Holy crap, 窶堋ア窶堙ォ = 窶堋イ窶堙ォツ? I'm so used to saying ヒ?ェナスナセ窶堋イ窶堙ォ or 窶愿アナスナセ窶堋イ窶堙ォ.
窶堋ア窶堙ォ is used like as a noun.Holy crap, 窶堋ア窶堙ォ = 窶堋イ窶堙ォツ?
"the adjectival form of a verb/adjective" + ころ
日本語を習い始めたころ, 忙しいころ
No problem. I'll reply here.Ah, I sent you both PM's. Sorry.
ツ春窶堙娯?堋ア窶堙ォ: around springDoes this mean that it is used as a possessive? Like, ツ静ヲツ青カ窶堙娯?怒 is the teacher's book? ツ春窶堙娯?堋ア窶堙ォ = spring's time?
窶愿コ窶怒ナ津ェ窶堙ーツ習窶堋「ナスn窶堙溪?堋ス is neither a noun nor a noun clause, so it can't be used with "窶堙娯?堋ア窶堙ォ." You can say 窶愿コ窶怒ナ津ェ窶堙ーツ習窶堋「ナスn窶堙?ツ習窶堋「窶堋ス窶堙??堙娯?堋ア窶堙ォ or "the noun form + 窶堙娯?堋ア窶堙ォ."So what could 窶愿コ窶怒ナ津ェ窶堙ーツ習窶堋「ナスn窶堙溪?堋ス窶堙娯?堋ア窶堙ォ be, the same thing as the first one? I honestly thought that the 窶堙 was a nominilizer to make it into a noun, for the previous example to occur.
Yes. 窶ケN窶堋ォ窶堋イ窶堙ォ can mean so.窶ケN窶堋ォ窶堋イ窶堙ォ窶堙固スナセナ?テ - the best timing to wake up?
ツ食窶堙冷?堋イ窶堙ォ窶堙啓/U]ニ椎?ニ停?愴担 hmm...I think this also makes sense if I can put, ヒ?ェナスナセ窶堋イ窶堙ォ窶堙姑弛ニ湛ツ。
Usually you can say like Okiru no ni ichiban ii jikan (toki, jikoku...)? Because I've never heard 起きごろ.Yes. 起きごろ can mean so.
Yeah, it's on the not-common-but-acceptable level.Usually you can say like Okiru no ni ichiban ii jikan (toki, jikoku...)? Because I've never heard 窶ケN窶堋ォ窶堋イ窶堙ォ.
春のころ: around spring
雪の東京: snowy Tokyo
春/雪 posseses something?:?
日本語を習い始めた is neither a noun nor a noun clause, so it can't be used with "のころ." You can say 日本語を習い始め/習いたてのころ or "the noun form + のころ."
ころ is used like as a noun.
"noun" + のころ
子供のころ, 春のころ
"the adjectival form of a verb/adjective" + ころ
日本語を習い始めたころ, 忙しいころ
In the previous example we made it 春のころ,now it is 春ごろ, is there any difference in meanings? Or is it as epigene said, sometimes the の is omitted?Whereas ごろ is used like as a suffix with a temporal word.
二時ごろ, 春ごろ
の relates two concepts, "around/about the time" and "just came to Japan," but not as a possessive, by demarking the time as recent. Similar to 日本語を始めてすぐの頃は, 子供の頃は etc.
There is no possibility to act a nominalizer because ばかり is a particle, it isn't following after an adjective or verb.
着く頃[ころ]でしょう。
Start out following the general rule that ころ gets attached to eras or periods of a broader duration (学生のころ、日本にいたころ, 若いころ == の for noun phrases)、with the phonetic change for このごろ、and "ごろ" as a suffix to particular time expressions (いつごろ、何時ごろ、そのごろ、など)。In the previous example we made it 春のころ,now it is 春ごろ, is there any difference in meanings? Or is it as epigene said, sometimes the の is omitted?
...with the phonetic change for 窶堋ア窶堙娯?堋イ窶堙ォツ、and "窶堋イ窶堙ォ" as a suffix to particular time expressions (窶堋「窶堙や?堋イ窶堙ォツ、窶ーツスナスナセ窶堋イ窶堙ォツ、窶堋サ窶堙娯?堋イ窶堙ォツ、窶堙遺?堙?ツ。
That's the same usage to ツ静。窶堙娯?愬停?ケナセ or "adjectival." Blue doesn't possess sweater, does it?;-)Aah, I'm not sure anymore. The only ツ_ツ_窶堙系oun I've come across are things like adjectives, such as 窶氾寂?堙姑短ツーニ耽ツーツ。
窶堙、窶堋ォ窶堙娯?堙??堋、窶堋ォ窶堙・窶堋、(just like this morningツ静。窶堙娯?愬停?ケナセ (setsu or yuki?)
Yes.Could you say 窶ーJ窶堙娯?ケナセ窶徭, as rainy Kyoto?
窶堙寂?堋ゥ窶堙ィ also acts like as a noun. That's why 窶堙 is needed.:?I'm still then extremely confused, because the conversation started with ツ食窶堙冷?堋ス窶堙寂?堋ゥ窶堙ィ窶堙娯?堋ア窶堙ォ. I'm afraid after all these posts, I still cannot grasp why this works. I can understand ツ食窶堙冷?堋ス窶堙寂?堋ゥ窶堙ィ窶堋ア窶堙ォ, mostly, but not 窶堙娯?堋ア窶堙ォツ。
Yes, becasue you bought the book in the past.I'll have to read into adjectival form, but I think you mean, the past tense? Like perhaps
窶怒窶堙ー窶敞停?堙≫?堋ス窶堋ア窶堙ォ - around the time I bought a book?
Basically, the same. ツ春窶堙娯?堋ア窶堙ォ is a kind of literary expression, whereas ツ春窶堋イ窶堙ォ sounds more colloquially.In the previous example we made it ツ春窶堙娯?堋ア窶堙ォツ,now it is ツ春窶堋イ窶堙ォ, is there any difference in meanings?
The reason we don't put 窶堙や?堋ュ窶堙啓/U]窶堋ア窶堙ォ is because it's not a noun or direct clause, right? But ヒ?ェナスナセ is a noun...
The biggest difference is 窶堙??堋ア窶堙ォ can be used with the present or progressive tense, as explained in the textbook you quoted. This is a bit advanced but "the present/progressive tense + 窶堙寂?堋ゥ窶堙ィ" has completely different meaning.I also will have to review 窶堙??堋ア窶堙ォ and 窶堙寂?堋ゥ窶堙ィ because for now the only thing I can think of is, 窶堙寂?堋ゥ窶堙ィ is used to also explain contextually whereas 窶堙??堋ア窶堙ォ (with a past tense) is just a plain statement? Can you have just the 窶堙寂?堋ゥ窶堙ィツ/窶堙??堋ア窶堙ォ at the end of a sentence?
Great advice!That's why the absolute best way to learn any language is to surround yourself with it. Listen to Japanese language radio broadcasts, watch news, movies and television. Speak with your friends whenever you can. Once you can begin isolating individual phrases, the natural rhythm and flow to their speech is soooo much easier to recall and recognize than clogging up the brain on nitty-gritty things like artificial grammar points and vocabulary and doing exercises. So Soak up the minimum in vocabulary and absorb grammar rules....but at least in partial immersion for functional proficiency the FUN way ! mwhaha!!!!
That's what I was thinking too. You see 秋のころ so much in 源氏.... 今年の秋ごろ is almost like dating a letter by comparison. lolBasically, the same. 春のころ is a kind of literary expression, whereas 春ごろ sounds more colloquially.
そうだなああああ....たいへん懐かしく思っている。このころは景気良かったよねぇ。このごろは全然 だけど。
Accepting and refusing invitations : (Or say yes hesitatingly, expecting that this reticence will be noticed...)
That's the one I am comparing it to. They look almost the same in meaning, B of the 1st and D of the 2nd. But as epigene stated, it's used emphatically, so...would the first one be, perhaps, a rejection to an invitation to a dinner? And the ところ would be maybe a friend asking what you recently did?
Actually, that is not the nominalizer but the pronoun, the alternative to "town" in this case.As usual, I marked it as a nominalizer and of course, it didn't work out. This is really frustrating, this is merely the first page of the first chapter's grammar excersizes. I can't understand anything...
I love you guys.
ナス窶樞?堋ェ窶敞停?堙≫?堋ス窶堙娯?堙債、ツ「窶愿コ窶怒ナ津ェ窶堙娯?「ツカ窶邸ツ」窶堙??堋「窶堋、窶怒窶堙??堋キツ。
Same thing, right?
AIBI(After Internet Before Internet)....インターネット以前の技術使って, 習ったので、時々、私は少なくとも1,2ヶ月以上, 答えを待たなければなりませんでしたよ。As usual, I marked it as a nominalizer and of course, it didn't work out. This is really frustrating, this is merely the first page of the first chapter's grammar excersizes. I can't understand anything...
I have a question on this. I understand the part before the の. I also noticed all the books like to use へ with 帰る, is this more preferred than に? Er, anyways, the no is what I am confused about. Is this another 国? Then the end of the sentence doesn't make sense to me. Airport until send to go (past tense)?
Thanks.
Yes, へ would be more common, but you can use に, too.I also noticed all the books like to use へ with 帰る, is this more preferred than に?
まで indicates a destination; not only "temporal"(i.e. "until") but also "spatial."Airport until send to go (past tense)?