All cultures have their unique trait contributions to benefiting education - and they can predominantly be broadly distinguished between eastern and western styles. In generalizations, the east is concerned with rote and regurgitation whereas the west is concerned with understanding and application, which I'm sure you're aware as you've also been educated via both means.
As to your question on the shaping of an individual's attitudes towards academics, again, the differences of systems lead to varying attitudes. The eastern style would invariably cause more respect and adherence to academics, whereas the western style, due to provoked thought, would have a more critical aspect to academics. However, both styles can overlap at different stages of education as the style is not constant when comparing primary education to tertiary education - the eastern style makes a large jump when reaching college to the style of the west.
As to work ethics, perhaps rote and regurgitation promotes more discipline and work ethic; but then again, it may encourage apprehension and indifference. Similarly, understanding and application promotes curiosity and personal endeavor; but, it may encourage laziness and lack of motivation. As you can see, there is no one-sided advantage for a particular style.
'Educational success' mostly hinges on grades and ideas. There's also no reason why the A+ student cannot be an intellectual as well (by 'intellectual', I assume you mean the latter). This is, however, completely different from success in other areas of life of course.
This would mean that inevitably cultural values do influence motivation at the outset, but what an individual makes of education is up to one's attitude through experience.