I thought it was a rational choice.
I think life is too short to search out for things that make you unhappy.
I suppose that I should add that I am of the opinion that if you plan to stay for more than a short vacation, I think you should try to learn the local language of any country you go to.
Perhaps I am wrong, but personally I don't find mild discrimination of non-citizens nearly as problematic as discrimination of citizens. Yes, there are human rights and they are to be observed and respected. But being allowed into a certain drinking establishment/onsen/etc. is not an inalienable human right in my opinion.
It is not a perfect society or place to live, no place is, but the minor restrictions and inconveniences I have to face to live out my life as I have chosen are very small indeed. Nothing in life comes for free, and I just see it as the price I pay to be a foreign national.
I think of that as his loss, not mine. Creeping exclusionism? I think I know what you're referring to, but I just don't see it. Yes, I've seen that immigration in getting more strict about enforcement and whatnot, but that's how it should have been from the beginning, IMO.His choice is rational in that he's reduced the risk of a similar misunderstanding, but the downside is he's excluding perfectly acceptable customers and is contributing to the creeping exclusionism in Japan.
I seem to remember hearing on NPR talk in certain places in America where public services are not being offered any longer to illegal immigrants (perhaps it was still only in the talking stage. I don't recall perfectly.) Is that not at least similar?It's understandable but not excusable. Just as a barber in another country refusing to serve Japanese because he once had an unpleasant experience with a Japanese customer would be inexcusable, and illegal.
I guess I must just be one of the lucky ones, then.I don't think many foreigners search out situations where they suffer discrimination. Just going about one's daily life does the trick.
At what level does it become a human rights violation? Can store people not decide whom they wish to serve? I understand your point about the rights of the customer, but what about the rights of the storekeeper? Can not the storekeeper take steps to avoid problems in the future?Of course being refused entry to a bar per se is not a human rights violation. But being refused any service on the basis of your race/origins certainly is. And I don't think it's even necessarily a citizenship thing. Most exclusionary establishments may refer to 'foriegners' but they acually seem to mean 'non-Japanese looking' people.
I suppose we just have to disagree. Yes, people do often have to pay for the sins of others, but I think in Japan this is where personal responsibility kicks in. I think that as foreigners, and by this I mostly mean non-citizens, the onus is on us and the children who have no choice but to live here to fit in as best as possible. It's a tough world, but it's the world we live in.They may well be minor inconveniences for you, but they foster a culture of discrimination which permeates through many layers of society, causing huge problems in other areas, especially for people who have almost no choice but to live here (eg children of immigrants.)
....
The only group I can legitimately see laying claim to this are mixed ethnicity children, half Japanese half something else, born and naturalized in Japan who experience discrimination based on appearance despite being FULL Japanese citizens. Everyone else has their own country to go home to and be accepted in. These kinds of changes take time and progress is being made. For now, the idea of going to another country and immediately expecting it to tailor itself to my needs, especially when uninvited, doesn't jive politically.....
Perhaps that's because people like me have not seen you mention this openly enough.I've also yet to see anyone respond to the idea that Japan simply isn't one of those countries with a large foreign population necessitating change in attitudes and perceptions. Government serves people. What is the point of having enforced legislation (and by enforced I don't mean the old men with the yellow arm bands scurrying around, encouraging people not to smoke, not to litter, etc., I mean courts setting precedents) if there's barely anyone there to benefit from it?
Yes, many newcomers arrive with false images, secondhand or outdated information, etc. No arguments there. But how to you see that as contributing to or leading to discrimination here?many people who go over to Japan do so with false impressions of what to expect and with little or no knowledge of the culture. This exacerbates and probably leads to many of these 'discriminatory' incidents.
Glenski said:The only stress I have is when people like you say they don't understand why this is so important. Granted, I don't lose sleep over such statements, but it makes me wonder just what is an important issue to you.
Are you living in Japan?
Do you have any work-related discrimination thrust upon you?
Ignore the problems, but they won't go away if you do.
I am curious about this statement you made, too, bakakanadajin:
Quote:many people who go over to Japan do so with false impressions of what to expect and with little or no knowledge of the culture. This exacerbates and probably leads to many of these 'discriminatory' incidents.
Yes, many newcomers arrive with false images, secondhand or outdated information, etc. No arguments there. But how to you see that as contributing to or leading to discrimination here?
Are foreigners to blame for being foreign?
Premature? To what? What are you/we waiting for that makes this premature?When I think about some of the things that are going on in the world I truly can't get as fired up about these issues as some. I just see this as pre-mature drum beating.
And, just how do you think that progress was made? Not by sitting back, accepting the problem and doing nothing about it.There is already progress being made and we've been through the examples already.
There's a difference between focusing on the negative in this discussion group, and focusing only on the negative issues in Japan outside the discussion group. As long as the topic is here in the forum, it only makes sense to focus on it. Ignoring it won't make it go away, whether you are in Japan or Canada.Some people don't see what's already there as being valuable, or else they prefer to focus more on the negatives instead of celebrating the positives.
I'm confused about what positivity you are trying to display. Being a "glass is half full" person is one thing, but you don't even seem to feel that the problem exists at all, or to any degree of importance.It's really subjective. My experience in Japan was, like others on here, mostly positive. I guess I'm just trying to remain positive.
If I were really a snippy person, I would throw that last statement back in your face and say, "Oh, that's just an isolated incident." I won't, and all I can say with great reluctance is that we are going to have to agree to disagree, but I'll also ask that you don't keep brushing off the problems here as unimportant to those who still live here.I just don't share some of the opinions that I've read. I've also several friends here in Toronto who are visiting from Japan and Korea and we hang out on a regular basis. Their dislike for foreigners is non-existent, another reason I can't honestly agree with some of what I've read.
Again with the "wait and see, don't be so premature" attitude. We've waited 12 years for Japan to enact laws to bolster its presumed support of the anti-discrimination treaty. I'm a very patient person, but that's far too long.For the issues that have been discussed in this thread, I'm not condoning any ignorance, more like patience.
It starts somewhere. The foreigner didn't cause the discrimination. That's the root of it all, not his response when encountering it. (However, I do agree, and have stated countless times, that people coming here to work should really prepare a lot more just to avoid as many surprises as possible.)if someone arrives in Japan with a false impression of what to expect and they're ill-equipped to deal maturely with some of the realities that exist outside their own borders I don't think that's Japan's fault either.
Yes, as we both have prepared before coming, and seem to have open minds about things here, the unprepared will be frustrated. That still doesn't condone the acts of discrimination themselves.By contrast, you'd be amazed how many people get over there and expect everyone to speak English and to be ready and waiting to help them settle in. It just doesn't work like that. This attitude contributes to a lot of frustration and misunderstanding down the road too when other issues crop up.
Well, of course, with those examples, it is clearly not racism. I don't see why you even bring them up.There were many situations where something went wrong and I was completely screwed. I lost my wallet in Roppongi, my phone randomly died on me, bank account issues, not being able to access my own money, getting my alien card, mail not arriving, being turned away at clubs without proper ID, getting lost, etc. Each time the resistance I met wasn't racism in my opinion,
Here it can be subtle or blatant.I agree with you to the extent thatr racism persists in subtle forms,
Hi! Thanks... it seems quite a lot's been said while I was away (motorcycling in Izu... no exclusionary problems to report...)Hello, again, Taiko666! It's nice to be able to have a rational discussion about such an emotional topic!
Creeping exclusionism? I think I know what you're referring to, but I just don't see it.
To a point. Refusing service to a person because they're drunk, abusive or dangerous is fine. But this question is so fundamental. If you believe that's it's ok to refuse to serve somebody based solely on their race, I don't think I or anyone else will persuade you otherwise.Can store people not decide whom they wish to serve?
If you're being excluded, it's impossible to fit in. And nobody benefits.I think that as foreigners, and by this I mostly mean non-citizens, the onus is on us and the children who have no choice but to live here to fit in as best as possible.
Sadly true, perhaps, but they can sure sue your butt off for your actions!If you believe that's it's ok to refuse to serve somebody based solely on their race, I don't think I or anyone else will persuade you otherwise.
I hate tv programs that depict Westerners as stupid, and what I hate more is the Westerners who "act" in these shows with exaggerated facial movements and sounds. I think they make it easier for Japanese to discriminate.
For example?:?:?:?:?I hate tv programs that depict Westerners as stupid, and what I hate more is the Westerners who "act" in these shows with exaggerated facial movements and sounds. I think they make it easier for Japanese to discriminate.
goldiegirl said:I hate tv programs that depict Westerners as stupid, and what I hate more is the Westerners who "act" in these shows with exaggerated facial movements and sounds. I think they make it easier for Japanese to discriminate.
bakakandajin said:The cruddier shows with the idiot gaijin are those variety shows with the games, costumes and challenges etc., which are funny but pretty mindless.
One person that comes to mind is Dave Spector, a "famous" 'gaijin tarento'. I believe he is still around. I remember reading in a magazine interview with him in English in Japan where he said that as long as the Japanese were paying him well he would act like a fool if that's what they wanted. His Japanese is pretty fluent also.diceke said:For example?:?:?:?:?
I thought that's what talento were supposed to do. Japanese comedians and talento do the craziest things all the time, so why should we get upset when some foreigner does the same thing?It's a sad person and situation who would sell themselves as media ****** for a few pieces of silver and make their own countrymen look like fools. Sadly, it still goes on today and I just shake my head.
I thought that's what talento were supposed to do. Japanese comedians and talento do the craziest things all the time, so why should we get upset when some foreigner does the same thing?
That makes no sense to me.
Of course, if the point of the tarento's act is to try to make himself/herself look like a bigger doink than the Japanese ones, then that can be considered problematic.
Well I don't know what 'kaere' means but I wonder what would happened here if someone did the same to a muslim.Hard to belive for me. I am reading a lot of things in this forum and to be honest I had no idea.P.S. Forgot to mention what happened to me a few years back: Came home one day, go to check my post & find my box out of the 100 or so is the only one vandalised. Later, got home one day to find 'Gaijin kaere' sprayed on my door.
Lovely.