TwistedMac
後輩
- 4 Mar 2004
- 2,267
- 96
what about just "africans"?King of Tokyo said:What the hell is so funny about that? It is a site for African-Americans in Japan, is that so unbelievable? Why do you find humor in that?
Winter said:KoT: I LOVE you're sig and avatar.
TwistedMac said:what about just "africans"?
or black people in europe?
or is it a closed society for only americans?
( serious question, don't take it wrong )
TwistedMac said:what is a black person in europe called anyway?..
african-european?... then is a white guy in africa a euro-african?
OHMIGAWD! i'm having deep thoughts here..
wait, I've heard "Eur-asian" before but i dunno what it is.. so is that europeans in asia?
always asumed it was the offspring of an asian and a european person :?
is that some "I get to say it, but you don't" thing?mikecash said:Are you familiar with Dr. Walter E. Williams and his personal opinion on the matter of a self-referent term as relates to his skin color?
TwistedMac said:is that some "I get to say it, but you don't" thing?
excerpt said:Today, it has become fashionable to refer to me as an African-American. I protest. One reason is that I risk being confused with an American of Egyptian or Afrikaner ancestry since both can legitimately be called African-Americans. Another reason is that I'm simply tired and worn out, not to mention the confusion for white people. Being 65, I've gone through a number of name changes that range from derogative names such as coon and nigger, to colored, person of color, Negro, Afro-American, and black. I refuse to change again and I'm going to leave this world as a black man.
What politicians are you referring to as promoting these referential changes in the language ? As I recall, it was blacks themselves that argued for African American that would reflect a higher awareness of ethnic identity, assert ancestral or group pride, etc., although a majority today seem to prefer 'black' over the newer terms. As "Indians" prefer that to "Native American," for whatever reasons that will continue to fluctuate every generation or so.Glenn said:[RANT]
Is it just me, or is the changing of referring to black people from "black" to "African-American" just some artificial and cosmetic way for politicians to attempt to show that they are affecting some sort of change that will help the plight of the black person in America, while at the same time making the language more inefficient and inaccurate, and creating a double standard for different groups of people?
Labelling things or people is not necessarily bad. People fit in certain categories, so what. It would be better to educate the world that people are not necessarily less worth than you just because they are different (belong to another category).antantrevolution said:PC isn't going to go away unless we can all get along and stop labeling things.
yeah, Like I'm a Swede and Bossel is German.. ok, now that's a bad example since that in facto makes me worth more than him...bossel said:Labelling things or people is not necessarily bad. People fit in certain categories, so what. It would be better to educate the world that people are not necessarily less worth than you just because they are different (belong to another category).
Elizabeth said:..As "Indians" prefer that to "Native American," for whatever reasons that will continue to fluctuate every generation or so.
I don't claim any inside sources, but from Wikipedia, people I've met travelling over the years as well as the new memorial in Washington to the American Indian rather than Native American.Winter said:I've not noticed this.
When I was growing up, I lived sporadically in San Francisco, and in my fathers' rez in Arizona, and never once growing up with his tribe did I ever hear anyone refer to themself as Indian or Native American. It was always the tribe.
Last time I remember, Indians hailed from a certain country in Asia.
aren't jews and hispanic people white?Elizabeth said: