FDR plans sneak attack before Pearl Harbor
Which is why Putin is wise to be wary of the US European missile defense initiative.Why would this be a surprise? The US, and every army in the world for that matter, has and always have had strategies to invade every country in the world.
Why would this be a surprise? The US, and every army in the world for that matter, has and always have had strategies to invade every country in the world. The cowardice (臆病) Japanese, however, went ahead with their plan.
Since 1979, when Saddam Insane was in power. He killed NO LESS than 1,500,000 of his own people through torture, execution and chemical weapons.
This has got to be one of the most ______________ threads that I think I have ever seen on this board.
What's the point here? Anti~Americanism? Anti-war in Iraq, Sadam Hussein and his extermination of his own people? FDR's "sneak" attack plans on Japan?
What?
So what if FDR's administration had plans, let's not forget who attacked first, thus making this all a moot point anyway.
Since 1979, when Saddam Insane was in power. He killed NO LESS than 1,500,000 of his own people through torture, execution and chemical weapons.
Japan had been doing atrocious things in Asia for decades and there was no end in sight. Germany has never attacked the US, yet we bombed the crap outta them around the same time and nobody seems to be complaining about that.
I bet he thinks the moon landings were staged too.
Shouldn't President Roosevelt haven't been worried about what happened in China as from 1937?
There was already a war going on in Asia, long before Pearl Harbour
that was nothing to do with US.
It means Us did a preemptive attack to Japan without proclamation of war.
or Flying tiger was a Just fly in china
The Tigers were a volunteer group that fought for the freedom of China against Japanese agression. Plain and simple.
Caster please get over it, Japan started the war in the Pacific, the USA ended it, that like it or not is a FACT.
Cripes Caster how old do you think I am? BTW you werent around either so what difference does it make?did you watched that.
Who cares? It was to fight against JAPANESE agression, that's all that counted back then.who gaved money to them?
it was easy to name that US likedOh btw the "Official" name was the American Volunteer Group, read this and you might understand somethings better
I think the English that you're looking for is,it was pretended, right?
American's volunteered to fight both in Britian and China, before the actual declaration of war against Japan and Germany.
Volunteered?
I dont think so.
it was pretended, right?
Be that as it may, and I thank you for stepping in here and trying to keep things on an even keel, I still am under the impression that Caster is unwilling to accept the fact that American's under the threat of losing their citizenship, volunteered to fight against the Japanese and Germans prior to the "official" declaration of war against all three Axis countries.I haven't been really been following this thread very much, but I think that Caster'S point is that if the U.S. government gave material and moral support to those volunteer efforts, then the U.S.'s official stance of neutrality at the time was what one would call "tatemae" in Japanese, but the "honne" was active hostility towards Japan.
In other words, America's moral high ground is due only to a technicallity.