Hmm, has anyone actually used those words since the end of the Edo period?3. Some KEIGO (specifically KENJOGO) are downright rude, such as 愚妻(my stupid wife), 豚児(my pig son) etc.
Do you like KEIGO?
To raise up who you are talking to with the honorific form, and then minimize your own actions with kenjogo is discrimination against whom ? Yourself and friends ?What I don't like about KEIGO is:
1. Discrimination based on age, rank, etc
2. You can't even talk properly without invading privacy. (such as asking age, job, etc)
Yes, " 愚妻" is still used with enough frequency to be considered a word that people still use today, especially within the middle aged to older generation.Hmm, has anyone actually used those words since the end of the Edo period?
I can do better than blogs. Shock, horror: I know actual Japanese people who don't know the words "tonji" or "gusai". It seems a lot of native speakers are no match for the clever people on web forums.豚児 is also more like my "foolish" son (and there is one for daughter also...). I've since read Japanese on blogs as saying they aren't familiar with the term which makes me think it lacks common usage today. Probably post-dating Edo, though.
You can get used to it but it's not just foreigners who have trouble with keigo.Keigo is part of Japanese. Get used to it.
I can do better than blogs. Shock, horror: I know actual Japanese people who don't know the words "tonji" or "gusai". It seems a lot of native speakers are no match for the clever people on web forums.
But, I have no idea when these terms fell into disuse. It's just a turn of phrase, like saying "Has anyone in Yorkshire worn wooden clogs since the Crimean War?" Bringing up "tonji" and "gusai" as part of one's objections to using keigo in modern Japanese is a bit like saying you don't want to visit London because of the "pea-soupers": these words are not part of the modern language.
Way to make a case. On one hand you ridicule with your witty remarks about how even "native speakers" have not heard the words "tonji" or "gusai", but the clever forum people have in your first post above, but then in the next quote you give proof that "native speakers" can't even use basic keigo in your local gym. Way to go about proving your point about how and what keigo is still used today... Especially by people who actually know how to speak it, not a person who works at your "local" gym who most likely has not had any substantial formal training on how to treat a customer.You can get used to it but it's not just foreigners who have trouble with keigo.
A while ago (I've told this story before) I was given some instructions by a young Japanese man, a member of a gym's staff, and he said to me "質問あれば、スタッフの方にお聞きしてください" .
Yes , thats right, most "native speakers" are not brought up in a house hold useing keigo daily, believe it or not it does have to be taught, just like mathematics. (just in case you didn't know that)
No problem. I used Mathematics as an example, but you could insert anything into the same sentence that requires some type of schooling/training to be proficient at.Can you just clarify that sentence really quickly? I underlined the part where it became confusing for me.
Yes, very good point. Congratulations.Dave, you make a good point.
Sure - there are non-native speakers who speak very nice English, and native speakers who speak badly. But anyone who is conceited enough to think that he or she is one of those non-native speakers with a great grasp of the language is skating on paper-thin ice. I once worked with a Japanese man who claimed that his grasp of English grammar was greater than we native speakers. His English went something like this:Think of how many native speakers of English say "I had went" or "didn't do nothing" and so on. Being a native speaker doesn't mean you get it right. STUDYING it means you get it right. I've known many foreigners studying English who had a better grasp of English grammar -- though maybe not vocabulary -- than many people born and bred in my home town.
No kidding.Now, we do this whole kind of stuff isn't it?
A native speaker of English, even a poorly educated one, will rarely make a mistake with language basics like "the" and "a", past and present tense, or singular and plural. I wouldn't expect the gym guy to have any problem telling whether to use "wa" or "ga", or whether to use the "te form" of the verb. Whereas. getting your keigo entirely the wrong way round seems to be a common mistake even for native speakers.Think of the conventional image in the US of a guy who teaches PE or works in a gym. Do you expect hyper-correct and polite English from him? Why should one expect the same (mutatis mutandis) from a similar fellow in Japan?
Do I sense a little hostility here?Yes, very good point. Congratulations.
Sure - there are non-native speakers who speak very nice English, and native speakers who speak badly. But anyone who is conceited enough to think that he or she is one of those non-native speakers with a great grasp of the language is skating on paper-thin ice. I once worked with a Japanese man who claimed that his grasp of English grammar was greater than native speakers. His English went something like this:
Hence asking any "native speaker" if a certain word is still used in the language today as evidence that it is not , is in itself flawed. Is that too hard for you to understand?A native speaker of English, even a poorly educated one, will rarely make a mistake with language basics like "the" and "a", past and present tense, or singular and plural. I wouldn't expect the gym guy to have any problem telling whether to use "wa" or "ga", or whether to use the "te form" of the verb. Whereas. getting your keigo entirely the wrong way round seems to be a common mistake even for native speakers.
I hate to interject, but don't you guys use some form of Keigo while on a job interview or talking to someone you don't know (like you wouldn't use short forms).
Unfortunately , there is no getting around you being a forigner, you will deffinately get points for trying to use Keigo. But if that makes you hard to understand you may give the employer the impression that you know less about the language than you really do.I don't want to go off topic here, but...perhaps I am being too hard on myself; I wouldn't want that "foreigner's pass" upon myself, I am an equal competing for that job, aren't I?. I think it's a given not to use short forms during a job interview. Is it looked down upon if you attempt to, but fail to use keigo properly? If you look at my topic where I delved into the intro to keigo, I did not do well at all, but I would hope the effort counts?...but that's against the foreigner's pass, haha.
You could be a part-timer or register clerk -- the kids working convenience stores don't even try it, or do with mistakes. I realize keigo is much less established than in the past, but it's definitely necessary for professionals and anyone who works in a service type industry as there are still lots of times you MUST use it such as on the phone, or dealing with superiors/customers/clients.I believe that you should concentrate on mastering the basic/plain form first. As someone else has mentioned, there are many different levels of keigo. Knowing when to use which level/form of keigo can only come after "having lived in the language" for some time (IMHO).
If you are planning to go for a job interview anytime soon, just narrow down your focus to 丁寧語(Teineigo), the polite speech (the kind they teach in your text books). If I were conducting the interview, I would much rather see someone who is polite and respectful while still being themselves than someone who is trying so hard to present her/himself as someone who s/he isn't by attempting to use advanced forms of keigo which they are obviously not at all comfortable in. I believe that your sincerity counts as much as, if not more than, being able to address your interviewer in perfect Keigo. Now, some jobs REQUIRE the ability to use Keigo correctly. Stay away from those jobs for now.
I personally think that someone using keigo (but not too well) in attempt to sound smart/sophisticated could make themselves appear even less so than they really are.