alexriversan
後輩
- 6 Mar 2005
- 300
- 12
- 28
people told me, i put myself in affairs which are not affecting me.
that's true, as long as they not carried out private.
we have discussions here, i.e. legs of japanese girls, which exclude woman.
means these posts are discriminatory, if not sexistic.
it is in the nature of these languages to assign gender.
same as all these dating sites, which make the suggestions "man seeks woman", "woman seeks man". and allows "very tolerant" to change these suggestions.
and your credit card score is gone...
i am one who likes to browse through any people, means i like the contrast and would get bored easily of "only woman". now this does not mean i belong to a special population group.
the fact something is usual does not mean it is normal. or why so many people are actually disconnecting from normality/society?
the term "japanese legs" would be discriminatory on the base of nationality.
nothing against you, english language allows to write that way. it does not mean it would be good.
recently i wrote to people, woman should go "top-free" and big b**bs would not be sane/normal. that's my viewpoint, and i like woman.
what about "legs with sex-appeal" (people use to use the term chicks, that's good?- as far as i have observed for woman)
that's true, as long as they not carried out private.
we have discussions here, i.e. legs of japanese girls, which exclude woman.
means these posts are discriminatory, if not sexistic.
it is in the nature of these languages to assign gender.
same as all these dating sites, which make the suggestions "man seeks woman", "woman seeks man". and allows "very tolerant" to change these suggestions.
and your credit card score is gone...
i am one who likes to browse through any people, means i like the contrast and would get bored easily of "only woman". now this does not mean i belong to a special population group.
the fact something is usual does not mean it is normal. or why so many people are actually disconnecting from normality/society?
the term "japanese legs" would be discriminatory on the base of nationality.
nothing against you, english language allows to write that way. it does not mean it would be good.
recently i wrote to people, woman should go "top-free" and big b**bs would not be sane/normal. that's my viewpoint, and i like woman.
what about "legs with sex-appeal" (people use to use the term chicks, that's good?- as far as i have observed for woman)