Hmm, so you mean "kare wa gakusei de wa nai" is the emphasized one of "kare wa gakusei de nai", for instance? I suppose "gakusei de nai" is basically used only as a clause.the ha is used as an emphasis for the negative.
Hmm, so you mean "kare wa gakusei de wa nai" is the emphasized one of "kare wa gakusei de nai", for instance? I suppose "gakusei de nai" is basically used only as a clause.
That seems similar to me "wa" in "~te wa ikenai/naranai" discussed in the following thread.
ては v.s. のは | Japan Forum
Hmm, I agree with the first 3 examples in the dictionary. They actually emphasize some part/meanings of 行かない, 美しい, 書いていない, respectively. But as for 真実ではない or "noun/na-adjective stem + ではない," the counterpart 真実でない doesn't exist at least as a main predicate. So I think the last example doesn't fit here.I was referring to the following:
http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn/152602/m0u/は/
(4)叙述を強める。
(イ)〔動詞・形容詞の連用形、および助詞「て・で」に付いて〕一続きの叙述の一部分を強調する。
「絶対に行き—しない」
「なるほど美しく—ある」
「まだ書いて—いない」
「真実で—ない」
It's ではない. And where have you seen てがある (aside form something like こういう手がある)? It doesn't look like any grammatical construct that I'm familiar with.
What you're talking about maybe be "te-form of verb + ある" or something like 置いてある, ～してある?Oops, I made two mistakes. I meant to type ではない and ーてある instead of てがある.
You know like in writing they end the sentence with である or blablaてある instead of だ, です or ます.
Btw, out of curiosity, I checked if でがある actually exist or not. It seem it is used in the for of ってがある.
Alright, so Google can't be trusted. I'm wondering now: did I take these from non-native speakers, or is this some dialectal thing? Or were they all just typos? I got 6,990,000 hits searching "ってがある" (I'm sure the reason for this is going to be something equally embarrassing...).
Hmm, interesting. That's at least not a standard Japanse. (A corpus returns 0 hit.) Young people's or some region's dialect?? I haven't ever heard this, though. I want to hear other members's opinion.Alright, so Google can't be trusted. I'm wondering now: did I take these from non-native speakers, or is this some dialectal thing? Or were they all just typos? I got 6,990,000 hits searching "ってがある" (I'm sure the reason for this is going to be something equally embarrassing...).
I vote for typo, too. (Just in case this is a vote...Hmm, interesting. That's at least not a standard Japanse. (A corpus returns 0 hit.) Young people's or some region's dialect?? I haven't ever heard this, though. I want to hear other members's opinion.
That's 遊び勝手. I realized some of the hits are that. (Also, for instance the second one in the first page is a proper noun 「プラザおでって」がある.) But, isn't 6,990,000 too many as a typo, even if they includes something like 遊び勝手 or プラザおでって?:?Alright, now that this is becoming clearer, can I ask about 遊びがってがある? I thought maybe it was supposed to be written 遊び勝って at first, but that didn't bring up anything in any dictionaries, so I thought maybe it was some slang word that hadn't made it to dictionaries yet, meaning something like 遊び甲斐 (if that even makes sense). I'm seeing it used in all sorts of ways as a noun in this search: "遊びがって". Is this another case of a typo? And if so, what's it supposed to be?
Alright, now that this is becoming clearer, can I ask about 遊びがってがある? I thought maybe it was supposed to be written 遊び勝って at first, but that didn't bring up anything in any dictionaries, so I thought maybe it was some slang word that hadn't made it to dictionaries yet, meaning something like 遊び甲斐 (if that even makes sense). I'm seeing it used in all sorts of ways as a noun in this search: "遊びがって". Is this another case of a typo? And if so, what's it supposed to be?
http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn/36082/m0u/勝手/かって 【勝手】
（名）
(3)便利。便宜。
「—の悪い家」「使い—がよい」