Politics Constitutional revision under Takaichi

PM Takaichi has pushed for constitutional revision from the outset of her administration, continuing one of the central political goals associated with her mentor, the late PM Abe. Takaichi supports constitutional revision for several interconnected reasons, most of them tied to security policy, national sovereignty, and long-standing conservative goals within Japan's ruling LDP.

The central issue is Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution, the so-called' pacifist clause', which renounces war and formally rejects the maintenance of 'war potential'. Conservatives within the LDP have argued for decades that the post-war Constitution, drafted during the Allied occupation, no longer reflects Japan's geopolitical situation.

She has repeatedly argued that Japan faces a much more dangerous regional environment than it did when the Constitution came into force in 1947. In particular, she points to China's growing military presence around Taiwan and the Senkaku Islands, North Korea's missile and nuclear programmes, and uncertainty over how reliable long-term US security guarantees may be in the future. She also argues that Japan needs to respond more flexibly during regional crises.

One of the main goals of constitutional revision is to explicitly recognise the Japan Self-Defence Forces in the Constitution. Japan already has one of the world's most advanced militaries, but Article 9 formally renounces the use of armed force, leaving the legal status of the Self-Defence Forces somewhat ambiguous. Takaichi and other conservatives argue that this contradiction should be clarified.

She has also supported the addition of emergency powers clauses to the Constitution. Supporters say these would allow the government to respond more effectively during situations such as military attacks, major natural disasters or cyberattacks. Critics, however, warn that such powers could weaken civil liberties and reduce parliamentary oversight.

I want to start this thread to discuss and to list sources and updates on the debate.

Here is a short piece by the BBC's new Tokyo correspondent, Mori Kurumi:


And a testimony to the fact that many Japanese do oppose any revision to Japan's pacifist Constitution:

Recent opinion polls reveal deep divisions among the public, from broad support for minor revisions, such as recognising the legal status of the self-defence forces, to opposition to fundamental changes to Japan's postwar pacifism. In a poll published at the weekend by the conservative Yomiuri Shimbun newspaper, 57% of respondents were in favour of revision. In comparison, a survey by the liberal Asahi Shimbun put support for reform at 47%. The constitutional constraints placed on Japan's military were highlighted in March, when Takaichi cited Article 9 to turn down a request – reportedly with reluctance – by Donald Trump to send the Maritime Self-Defence Force to the Strait of Hormuz. On Sunday, the constitutional memorial day, an estimated 50,000 people gathered at a park in Tokyo in support of the document, whose wording has remained unchanged since it went into effect on 3 May 1947.

Click to expand...