common recognizability of "Nippon" or "Nihon"

Joined
24 Mar 2007
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am Japanese and am wondering if common educated foreigners know "Nippon" or "Nihon" means "Japan" or not.

Any answers appreciated.
 
Well, I'm not exactly common, but I know those as well as "Wa" and "Yamato". Although I don't think my family knows that Nihon or Nippon refers to Japan, during the war "Nip" was a derrogatory word used to refer to Japanese people in America. Therefore I would assume that many people of that generation would know Nippon, although they probably haven't thought about it much for years.
 
Anyone who has studied (even a little bit of) Japanese or Japanese history is probably familiar with the term, as well as those who are interested in pop culture, but it's not exactly a common word amongst English speakers.
 
Nor is it common knowledge at all, that it's Toukyou, not Tokyo... since there isn't any real system of double vowels that aren't diphthongs in English, the double-length syllable gets shortened to a single syllable. as well.
 
Why is there a difference of Nihon and Nippon? Do the to words that both mean the same thing just come from different accents/dialects.
I got an airmail letter from a girl in Japan, and it says nippon on the stamps.

Would it matter which one you used?
 
In the good ol days.

Back in the late 40's and 50's , many things from Japan had "made in Nippon" stamped or written on them if I recall right. I think old Japanese money had "Nippon" on it also.

Uncle Frank

 
Almost no people here know what Nippon or Nihon mean.
I too wonder the meaning difference between Nippon and Nihon. I will appreciate if someone explains.
 
Thank you for feedbacks.

As for difference between Nippon and Nihon, there is no difference in meaning. It happens because most Kanji characters have several way to pronounce. In this case,

日 : nichi / hi / bi
本 : hon / moto / ppon
 
The word "Nippon" still shows up on today's currency, and I see a lot of companies using it, but in daily conversation, it's almost always "Nihon." The characters for "Nihon" and "Nippon" are identical; it's just a different way to say the same thing. I'd just like to point out that "ppon" is not an actual reading for 窶怒. It is a variation of "hon" that changes due to the sounds in the character before it.

Also, while there are dipthongs in Japanese, not all long vowels are dipthongs. The definition of a dipthong requires the articulation of the vowel to actually change (such as the English "eye" and the Japanese ヒ?、/ai). While romanizations such as "Tokyo" don't express the length of the vowels, the quality of those vowels don't actually change, so it's technically much closer to the true pronunciation than "Toukyou," which might convince unknowing English speakers that those extended vowels dipthongs, when they are not.

Wiki Article

窶愿コ窶怒ナ津ェ窶堙??堙坂?凖環湘ュ窶堙娯?ーテッヒ彙窶堙俄?堋ィ窶堋「窶堙?但ニ辰ツ、ニ但ニ脱ツ、ニ但ニ竪ツ、ニ脱ニ辰ツ、ニ棚ニ辰窶堙遺?堙??堋ェ窶愿アツ重窶「テェ窶ーツケ窶堙??堋オ窶堙?陳サ窶堙ェ窶堙「窶堋キ窶堋「ツ。窶堋オ窶堋ゥ窶堋オツ、窶堙、窶堙≫?堋ュ窶堙ィ窶卩。窶扣窶堙俄?敖ュ窶ーツケ窶堋ウ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥ窶堙??「テェ窶ーツケツ静壺?伉ア窶堙??堙遺?堙ィツ、窶愿コ窶怒ツ人窶堙戸?毒スツッ窶堙??堙?窶堙や?堙娯?「テェ窶ーツケ窶堙??堋オ窶堙??オ窶堙ュ窶堙ェ窶堙ゥツ。
my translation

In normal Japanese conversation, ai, ai, ae, ui, oi, etc appear commonly as dipthongs. However, speaking slowly and pronouncing the vowels carefully, Japanese people are conscious of and treat them as two separate vowels.
 
Plenty of literature recognizes the more accurate names of "Nippon" or "Nihon" for what most English-speakers call "Japan". Some authors never refer to it as "Japan" or it's people as "Japanese" (among them William Gibson and Neal Stephenson come to mind). Mostly it's "Nipponese" with those authors, but they are few, and most English writers call the nation "Japan."

From what I understand, we call if Japan because of the Mandarin Chinese pronunciation of the kanji. The Portuguese recorded the term from the Chinese as "Sipangu" or "Zipangu" if I remember correctly, and it made its way into English from there.

I, for one, would prefer to go around saying "Nippon" and "Nipponese", but most people would either not understand or take a moment to figure it out.
 
Also, while there are dipthongs in Japanese, not all long vowels are dipthongs. The definition of a dipthong requires the articulation of the vowel to actually change (such as the English "eye" and the Japanese ヒ?、/ai). While romanizations such as "Tokyo" don't express the length of the vowels, the quality of those vowels don't actually change, so it's technically much closer to the true pronunciation than "Toukyou," which might convince unknowing English speakers that those extended vowels dipthongs, when they are not.
I'm not refuting you, but every book I've read, and even the book, "The History of the Japanese Language" deny the existence of diphthongs in the language.

For a possibly unrelated example, however, take the kanji CHIKU / take, 窶處

...when we say the word, aodake ツ静や?處ツ (green bamboo), the take pronunciation changes to dake because of the ao it follows... I know this is not really what we're talking about when we say diphthongs, I think it's called something like (Mike Cash mentioned it once... to my query, and it slips my mind), phonetic transference... You probably know what I am referring to, but can you please explain an example of a Japanese diphthong?

Plenty of literature recognizes the more accurate names of "Nippon" or "Nihon" for what most English-speakers call "Japan". Some authors never refer to it as "Japan" or it's people as "Japanese" (among them William Gibson and Neal Stephenson come to mind). Mostly it's "Nipponese" with those authors, but they are few, and most English writers call the nation "Japan."
Those authors are probably outliers, well, unless you consider Cyberpunk authors in general as outliers in their understanding or use of Japanese as a major focus to their works... I don't doubt however that authors who do write concerning Japan use these words more often, but I'd say specifically, those in the Cyberpunk genre, especially Gibson, are well known for it... he of course wrote of the sprawling "Chiba City"...

Offtopic: The Diamond Age, that's a book I'd like to read.
 
Last edited:
As for difference between Nippon and Nihon, there is no difference in meaning. It happens because most Kanji characters have several way to pronounce. In this case,

窶愿コ : nichi / hi / bi
窶怒 : hon / moto / ppon

Now try explaining how you get Nihon from those readings. :-)

Although I think the readings are more like this:

窶愿コ: NICHI/JITSU/hi/ka (for days of the month; e.g. futsuka, mikka, yokka, etc.)
窶怒: HON/moto
 
I'm not refuting you, but every book I've read, and even the book, "The History of the Japanese Language" deny the existence of diphthongs in the language.
Isn't that the very definition of refution? 😊
For a possibly unrelated example, however, take the kanji CHIKU / take, 窶處

...when we say the word, aodake ツ静や?處ツ (green bamboo), the take pronunciation changes to dake because of the ao it follows... I know this is not really what we're talking about when we say diphthongs, I think it's called something like (Mike Cash mentioned it once... to my query, and it slips my mind), phonetic transference... You probably know what I am referring to, but can you please explain an example of a Japanese diphthong?
Yes, that example is unrelated. As the quote at the bottom of my last post stated, most of the sounds in Japanese commonly thought to be dipthongs (and certainly sound as such in normal conversation) are clearly separated into two separate vowels when speech is slowed down. This is the distinction between the English and Japanese sounds (such as eye and ai), in that they are considered a part of the same vowel in English, and two consecutive vowels in Japanese.

However, I've seen 窶堙ィ窶堙。ツ、窶堙ィ窶堙」ツ、and 窶堙ィ窶堙・ referred to as dipthongs as well. I will ask my professor, once the semester starts.
 
How could those be referred to as diphthongs? There's only one vowel in them. At best if you don't count the palatal glide as a consonant, it's a semi-vowel, which still isn't a vowel, which means it can't be a diphthong (unless I'm misunderstanding what a diphthong is).
 
I'm not quite sure why it was referred to as such, which is why I want to ask my professor. None of the sources online seem to agree; some say that there are, some say there aren't, and some say that there are (sometimes). I'm not within arms reach of a good book on the subject, so I'll defer to experience when the chance arises.
 
Well, the question of whether Japanese has diphthongs aside (from what I've read they don't, but I'm curious as to what your teacher says), from pretty much every definition I've read online, from Mirriam-Webster's Dictionary to Wikipedia to the glossary of linguistic terms, a diphthong is basically two vowels connected by a glide and constituting one sound. The important thing here is "two vowels," which yôon (e.g. 窶堙ィ窶堙。, 窶堙ィ窶堙」, 窶堙ィ窶堙・) don't have, so I'd say they quite clearly are not diphthongs.
 
Last edited:
Plenty of literature recognizes the more accurate names of "Nippon" or "Nihon" for what most English-speakers call "Japan". Some authors never refer to it as "Japan" or it's people as "Japanese" (among them William Gibson and Neal Stephenson come to mind). Mostly it's "Nipponese" with those authors, but they are few, and most English writers call the nation "Japan."
From what I understand, we call if Japan because of the Mandarin Chinese pronunciation of the kanji. The Portuguese recorded the term from the Chinese as "Sipangu" or "Zipangu" if I remember correctly, and it made its way into English from there.
I, for one, would prefer to go around saying "Nippon" and "Nipponese", but most people would either not understand or take a moment to figure it out.
Of course they would. Drastically altering foreign place names in any language that doesn't have a built in system for importing foreign words is a perfectly necessary convention. Nippon is no further from Japan in English than Chung-kuo for China or Chosen as the Anglosizing of Korea.

In addition to company names and money I hear Nippon occasionally in the news in discussions of the North Korean nuclear talks, it's often shouted at sporting events....basically Nippon is slightly more nationalistic and most analogous to the difference between America and the United States.

I've never considered the difference such a big deal. Naturally it won't be commonly recogized by anyone without some familiarity in the language.
 
Nitpicking: I think Zhongguo or, perhaps better, the non-standard (but fairly phonetically close for English speakers) Jonggwo would be better for China, if we were to pick a new name that more closely approximates the native pronunciation (that is if we're counting Mandarin as native Chinese).

For Korea I'm not sure what the northerners refer to themselves as, but the southerners use Hanguk, as in Hanguk-saram (ナ?テ佛。ツ?ツ人(?), 한국사람, Korean people) and Hanguk-eo (ナ?テ佛。ツ?ナ津ェ, 한구어, Korean language).

If anyone actually knows Korean feel free to correct me there.
 
For Korea I'm not sure what the northerners refer to themselves as, but the southerners use Hanguk, as in Hanguk-saram (ナ?テ佛。ツ?ツ人(?), 한국사람, Korean people) and Hanguk-eo (ナ?テ佛。ツ?ナ津ェ, 한구어, Korean language).
If anyone actually knows Korean feel free to correct me there.
Well, anyway....I'm fairly sure I've heard secondhand that Korean call themselves something more similar to the Japanese pronuncation 'Chosen' ツ(窶卍ゥ窶朗ツ) for the Korean penninsula/nation of people and Kita Chosen for the North. Could it be 'Choson' or 'Chosen' in Korean ?

At least it would be interesting if that turns out to be more phonetically similar to the Japanese than Hanguk to kankoku ナ?テ伉坂?伉。And it is not just my evil, twisted Japanese side of the brain talking. :p
 
From what I've heard, North Korea calls itself 朝鮮, hence why NK is called 北朝鮮 in Japanese.
 
Now try explaining how you get Nihon from those readings. :-)

Although I think the readings are more like this:

窶愿コ: NICHI/JITSU/hi/ka (for days of the month; e.g. futsuka, mikka, yokka, etc.)
窶怒: HON/moto

Yeah, you are right. There are more readings than what I listed. It is hard to remind once for all :P

窶愿コ: ni ツ?ィ 窶愿コ窶怒(ni-ppon, ni-hon) 窶愿コ窶ーテ?ni-kka) 窶愿コ窶凖カ(ni-ttei)
 
From what I've heard, North Korea calls itself 窶卍ゥ窶朗, hence why NK is called 窶徒窶卍ゥ窶朗 in Japanese.
Apparently both ナ?テ and 窶朗 can mean Korea in Japanese. It'll be interesting to see what is used when there is eventual reunification.
 
Yeah, you are right. There are more readings than what I listed. It is hard to remind once for all :P

窶愿コ: ni ツ?ィ 窶愿コ窶怒(ni-ppon, ni-hon) 窶愿コ窶ーテ?ni-kka) 窶愿コ窶凖カ(ni-ttei)

I don't think 窶愿コ should be regarded "ni".
To be precise, it should be 窶堙俄?堙? which comes from 窶堙俄?堋ソ.
 
Back
Top Bottom