While you're making fun of other people's debt and taking Japanese debt lightly, please remember that if Japan did not have such a crushing debt, it couild have built a trans national maglev rail system, built it own stealth fighters, and added 2 more Rainbow Bridges in Tokyo Bay. (Just kidding on that last part.) But seriously, Japan can't lower corporate tax rate, which is one of highest in the world, making it difficult for companies to compete globally. We will also have to pay at least double the current consumption tax soon because Japan can't wait until inflation kicks in to pay down the debt.
I wonder why JPY continues to soar against USD/Euro while everybody says that Japan is 200% GDP Debt-Laden country and theoretically being in the already-collapsed.
Because unlike dismal scientists, politicians have to win elections.Plus, why US/EU countries continue to follow Japan's path - those governments tend to seek exit policy when they see a little sign of recovery and plunge again - the same as Japan's mistakes.
Well.... I thought the rest of world make fun of Japan's government debt (saying .... 200% of GDP !) until recently.... or maybe still, including Anglo-American rating firms as well as "quality" newspaper of those countries.
However, reality looks quite different. market price of sovereign bonds of PIGS (Southern European countries) has begun to decline, meaning yield is soaring, while their accumulated debt is less than 100% of their GDP, meaning less than half of Japan.
So I am making fun of Anglo-American rating firms, "quality" newspapers, and novel-prized economists as well as financial pundits of Wesstern economies, Not making fun of debts of PIGS.
First, gross debt levels are misleading. Japan's debt, after netting off the state's own holdings, is less than 100 per cent of GDP. Second, the cost of servicing its debt is low, at roughly 1.3 per cent of GDP. That compares with 1.8 per cent in the US, 2.3 per cent in the UK and 5.3 per cent in Italy. Third, Japan has fiscal wiggle room: sales tax is just 5 per cent. Fourth, 95 per cent of Japan's debt is domestically owned. Fickle foreigners have almost no sway.
Banks are awash with deposits that they need to place somewhere. For some time yet, the government will not find it hard to secure buyers for JGBs. Japan's debt problem will be worked out in the family.
Astroboy, what's your view on the privatization of Japan Post?
As you may know, Key element of Japan Post's privatization is .... its financial function of Japan Post.
Privatization of Japan Post has long been requested by US government as it was pushed by Wall Street. US government and its financial advisors wanted to change the structure of Japan's economy - being full of cash saving.
They believed ... if Japan Post goes privatized, Japan Post will need to become more profitable .... meaning seek more yield instead of low-yield JGB ... and meaning more opportunity for Goldman Sachs, Lehman Bros, etc.
However, at the end of the day, such an aim failed... not because of change of power to DPJ, but because of self-collapse of Wall Street.
Plus, even though Japan Post complete privatization, it would have not been really going the way that the Wall Street planned as Japanese financial companies, including new Japan Post, will avoid financial risks, .... meaning their asset management will focus on domestic even at very low yield ..... meaning purchasing more JGB. It is obvious from Japan's own lesson of bubble economy.
Unemployment rate declined to 4.9%, household spending up, 10-year JGB auction went well.
That's in addition to surging exports and increase in retail sales.
As you may know, Key element of Japan Post's privatization is .... its financial function of Japan Post.
Privatization of Japan Post has long been requested by US government as it was pushed by Wall Street. US government and its financial advisors wanted to change the structure of Japan's economy - being full of cash saving.
They believed ... if Japan Post goes privatized, Japan Post will need to become more profitable .... meaning seek more yield instead of low-yield JGB ... and meaning more opportunity for Goldman Sachs, Lehman Bros, etc.
However, at the end of the day, such an aim failed... not because of change of power to DPJ, but because of self-collapse of Wall Street.
Plus, even though Japan Post complete privatization, it would have not been really going the way that the Wall Street planned as Japanese financial companies, including new Japan Post, will avoid financial risks, .... meaning their asset management will focus on domestic even at very low yield ..... meaning purchasing more JGB. It is obvious from Japan's own lesson of bubble economy.
As expected, Washington is screaming bloody murder over the overhaul of Japan Post
Probably financial bundits of Wallstreet are now setting their targets against Japan. So, we must keep low profile until the strom pass through us.
Under the current conditions of the Japanese economy where deflation continues since the country cannot break out of the recession, if that five trillion yen had been used for the expansion of domestic demand, business tax reductions, and other similar needs, it may have lead the economy towards prosperity through a rapid increase in competitive power.
The decision made by the Hatoyama cabinet concerning the use of those funds is clearly aimed at equality rather than competition. The problem is perhaps that like America, Japan has become a country that has reached its competitive peak due to easing regulations. Or more specifically, Japan, a country among developed nations with its middle class being the largest and universal health care, may be heading too far towards equality and probably needs to become a bit more competitive. In the next election, I would like to see debate occur concerning the direction that Japan must head towards.
At any rate, I would like to continue to report the outcome of the unfolding drama starring the developed nations entering the 21 century together with the advancing and underdeveloped nations striving to achieve the same success of those developed nations.
Lead mainly by capitalism, America is a society composed of both "winners" and "losers" with freedom and competition serving as its foundation.
Until today, there was absolutely no reason for the "winners" to help the 32 million uninsured "losers" in such a country that defines capitalism. The $940 billion health care reform cost will be covered by tax increases for individuals who receive yearly incomes of $200,000 or more and on investment returns such as dividends and capital gains. In order words, the "winners" are now 100% responsible for taking care of the "losers".
During the 20th century, developed nations with a focus on America were wealthy and experienced rapid economic growth to the max through competition they were prepared to go to war for. Then, the economic growth stopped in these developing nations where it seemed like a family of five would eventually have a car for each person. What is necessary for societies that have experience rapid growth but have stopped growing? Do they need further competition or is the spirit of competition opposed to the distribution of human wealth? Although the American public chose these changes adopted by President Obama, both President Obama and the American public probably care themselves about these changes for equality, something which is not born as a result of competition.
Since the flow of history is now changing, we must about the factors that change the flow of the markets. As expected, the flow of the stock, bond, foreign exchange, and commodity markets will also change.
This is because important things are changing for mankind.
I cannot see "Japan" in the list the Safest Risk countries. It is fine....
But despite CMA report, the 10-years sovereign bond yield of Japan is 1.385% as of today, the lowest in the world. I think CMA must stand for CoMediAn or similars.
Japan is still the world's largest creditor nation, and that's not going to change anytime soon. Hence JGB has a well deserved status as one of the safest investments in the world, regardless of the doom and gloom from rating agencies and charlatan economists.