This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

News Abe's controversial state funeral

thomas

Unswerving cyclist
Admin
Joined
14 Mar 2002
Messages
21,054
Reaction score
18,910
I decided to open a new thread on the topic, as the coming weeks will bring more discussion and protests.

Yesterday, 4,000 people gathered around the Diet building in Tokyo and - wow - some local media reported it.



It's great to see young and old united in their criticism. Their arguments - inconsistent policies, waste of taxes in the light of the pandemic - will be particularly hard to refute (see below).


Meanwhile, PM Kishida pledged to 'squarely' respond to state funeral criticism. Let's see if he can square the circle.

 
The protest was also briefly shown on the national NHK news, much to my surprise.

My view is that state funerals for divisive people shouldn't be held because they don't represent the views of the majority of the state. Also, although Abe was in power for a long time for a Japanese PM, which made him a highly familiar figure to Japanese people, it's difficult to pinpoint any other achievements apart from longevity (in power if not in life) when his legacy is examined in any detail. For example, despite his famed three arrows, this graph nicely shows what happened to Japan's growth rate under Abe - it hovered around zero as it has done since the end of the bubble.
 
I agree. And let's face it: whenever things got tough, he just bailed out. This happened in both his tenures. I felt sorry for former PM Suga, who had to take over the unfortunate Olympic agenda.

I am afraid Kishida has painted himself into a corner: a cancellation would be a significant loss of face while holding the state funeral will be detrimental to the LDP.
 
I don't feel THAT sorry for Suga - he worked for many years as Abe's enforcer!
 
I don't feel THAT sorry for Suga - he worked for many years as Abe's enforcer!

Agreed, but looking back at his tenure, Suga seemed the lesser evil. It feels like looking at the G.W. Bush administration after Tramp's infantocracy.

Suga's stern and rigid comportment completely changed when he became PM: he was under heavy flak from day one, steadily losing ground. My wife misses his teary-eyed press conferences.
 
When you think things can't get worse...

Today, chief Cabinet secretary Hirokazu Matsuno declared that no special treatment was given to Murayama Inc., the successful bidder of Abe's funeral. Murayama Inc. has been involved in several controversial government-sponsored events, like Abe's infamous sakura party, and was the only bidder. Also, it has been reported that company representatives met with the Cabinet Office before bidding.

How long will the Japanese electorate and taxpayers tolerate such scandals? Remember Abenomask.



 
The government sure made a bollocks of this funeral. I guess the government misjudged the public sentiment over Abe? Because of the tragic way he died, they assumed the public would want a lavish, public c. But, as tragic and shocking as his death was, there is a very vocal percentage of the population who doesn't want any part of this display. And now its cocked up even more because of bid-rigging allegations.

Its like what would happen if you asked the International Olympic Committee to organize a state funeral.
 
Reuters and Kyodo have just reported that the government allocated 1.4 billion JPY for the state funeral to cover security costs and welcome foreign dignitaries.



 
So the cost of the funeral will be over six times the original quote.
They're taking the piss.
 
Not too late to convert it to a virtual event. Lay him out, set up a camera, live stream and add a condolences blog. I can help for USD $1 million.
 
Today, PM Kishida defended Mr Abe's state funeral, stating it was "appropriate" given the former's "achievements. He did not mention which achievements he was referring to apart from being the longest-serving PM. "I humbly accept the criticism that my explanation was insufficient," Kishida told members of parliament in response to questions about the issue.


Honestly, there is nothing to explain except why there was no public debate before the decision to hold a state funeral and why the taxpayers, most of whom oppose the funeral, have to foot the bill!

Interestingly, Japan faced a similar situation in 1975, when the state funeral of PM Eisaku Sato, the longest-serving PM until then and a Nobel Peace Prize winner no less, was cancelled for legal concerns.


Such concerns do not seem relevant in 2022, despite the lack of actual achievements.

 
I was hoping that Queen Elizabeth's (legitimate) state funeral would rain on Kishida's parade, but obviously, it doesn't. Contrary to conventions, he named the list of foreign dignitaries who would attend.


 
Nevertheless, I'm sure plenty of Japanese people will be noting the contrast between a state funeral for someone with 70 years of exemplary service and one for a person whose tenure was associated with mediocrity, authoritarianism, and corruption.
 
A one-hour street survey in Okayama felt the pulse of the Japanese population on the issue of Abe's state funeral. A citizens' group carried out the poll asking pedestrians in the city of Okayama's Kita Ward to put stickers on a board under the sections of either "support," "oppose", or "neither" as part of the group's nationwide activities amid a divide in public opinion. After about one hour, those opposed to the funeral had gathered the greatest number of 55 stickers, while "support" stood at 33 and "neither" at 14.

It's interesting to see someone in their 20s defending Abe and a 60-year-old salaryman pointing out Abe's corruption and the democratic deficiencies of Kishida's hasty decision.



 
That's what I call guts: the municipality of Kamakura has adopted by majority vote a written opinion demanding the cancellation of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's state funeral.




Also, in Kanagawa, the mayor of Yokosuka single-handedly decided to fly flags at half-staff at municipal facilities, including city hall and administration centres, on 27 September.


 
During my recent trip I actually walked by, on several occasions, the spot that he was shot. It was right next to Nara Family department store which we went to a few times.

I am glad to see the populous is pushing back and not just accepting this from the National government.
 
More subversion: the governors of Okinawa, Shizuoka, and Nagano decided not to attend the funeral.




PM Kishida has manoeuvred himself into a corner: unable to convince the public of the necessity of the state funeral, his approval rates keep tumbling.




It seems that Kishida's replacement is a topic discussed behind closed doors. However:

And the LDP faction led by Abe remains rudderless, so there is no obvious movement within the party to seek a replacement for Kishida.

 
Due to the queen's state funeral, this news did not get the coverage it deserved: yesterday, 13,000 people demonstrated against Abe's state funeral, which is quite astonishing for Japan on a rainy Typhoon day, to boot!


 
Not a very catchy name for a protest group! Still, very heartening news. If you hear of any other events, can you post them?
 
Not a very catchy name for a protest group! Still, very heartening news. If you hear of any other events, can you post them?

Unfortunately, I always find out the next day in the media. Change.org provides a lot of exciting info once you have signed one of their petitions. A new campaign questions the Japanese media's role and integrity: most of them have criticised the funeral but will still cover the event and send their top execs.

 
Today, in the early morning, a man in his 70s set himself on fire near the prime minister's office in Tokyo's Chiyoda Ward to protest the planned state funeral for former PM Abe. He survived with severe burns on his entire body.



 
They've not reported it yet on the NHK local news yet, although there has been plenty of speculation on the weather during the coming long weekend!
 
Nevertheless, I'm sure plenty of Japanese people will be noting the contrast between a state funeral for someone with 70 years of exemplary service and one for a person whose tenure was associated with mediocrity, authoritarianism, and corruption.
Where is this exemplary service- where she awarded the Royal Family millions of dollars and wrote provisions into legislation to ensure everything benefits the Royal Family and the tyrannical control of the family. The main people who care about her passing are the media as they are losing an easy show.
 
Number of state-funeral-related self-immolations:

Abe (1) : Queen (0)

Clearly, Abe's the winner. His score would probably be higher if we compared them based on corruption or divisiveness.

Anyhow, one LDP member, Murakami Seiichiro, a former Cabinet member and Abe critic, came forward and chastised his fellow LDP lawmakers for remaining silent on the issue.



I assume he's got nothing to lose politically, but it shows that there's simmering dissent even within LDP ranks.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…