窶凖環州ﾅｽ窶毒陳?Tongzhou Incident)

[caster51]

http://homepage3.nifty.com/kadzuwo/history/tongzhou.htm
Tungchow mutiny - Wikipedia

why does china avoid this incident?
why dose chinese used japanese victims pics as chinese victims☝

why dose China fake the Japanese victim's pics as the chinese victim?

is this incident written in the chinese taxtbook?

 

[caster51]

Photos document brutality in Shanghai

CNN - Photos document brutality in Shanghai - Sept. 23, 1996

As for the truth, did japanese army really kill the Chinese civilian?

 

[nice gaijin]

Do brutalities committed by one side of a conflict absolve the other?

 

[Supervin]

http://homepage3.nifty.com/kadzuwo/history/tongzhou.htm
Tungchow mutiny - Wikipedia
why does china avoid this incident?
why dose chinese used japanese victims pics as chinese victims☝
why dose China fake the Japanese victim's pics as the chinese victim?
is this incident written in the chinese taxtbook?

Look, this has been raised so many times - it's a futile argument.

You can't compare 200 - 400 deaths in the Tongzhou Incident to 200,000 - 300,000 deaths in the Nanjing Massacre. It's like comparing classroom slaughter to genocide. When you get to this point, the rest of your above queries are entirely irrelevant.

I can't be bothered to rehearse material from the mother thread here on Japan's WWII atrocities when you're just too lazy to read: https://jref.com/showthread.php?t=16607&page=7#164

Please peruse the above thread.

 

[tiku taku]

You can't compare 200 - 400 deaths in the Tongzhou Incident to 200,000 - 300,000 deaths in the Nanjing Massacre.

1) 200,000 and 300,000 is very wild guess number. Which is the actual number of death?

2) How do you know 200,000 people was dead?

2) So you don't care 200 - 400 death. All of Chinese does't care 200- 400 death too?

I think those Chinise and Japanese who killed inocent people is same. Both were ugly murder.