diligentcircle
Sempai
- 21 Jun 2017
- 703
- 97
1 -妹は転んだけど、私はぜんぜん知らなかったです。
"My little sister fell, but I didn't know about it."
2- 明日銀行に行って、お金を持つ。
"I'll be going to the bank tomorrow and getting some money."
3- 殺すこと辞めなさい!
Intended meaning: "Stop killing people!"
4 勉強が大切よ。辞めればいけない!
"Studying is absolutely important. Keep studying!"
5 おいしい食べ物がよく辛い。例えば、タイ料理が一番好き です。
"Food I find to be delicious is often spicy. As an example, Thai cuisine is my favorite."
お金を引き出す is more usual for this purpose.
I can't say I've ever heard anyone say that. I always hear お金をおろす。
"I find" in English can also just indicate a personal preference. I'm pretty sure 思う isn't the sort of thought I was trying to get across.The "I find" goes well with "と思います" or did you actually mean to state that delicious food IS spicy in this case?
No, I just wanted to use 銀行 somehow, and I also wanted to use 持つ somehow, so I ended up sticking the two together.持っていく and 持ってくる are used in japanese for "take" and "bring" respectively, you were probably thinking about them when you wrote this , I guess?
Huh, that's an easy word, especially since I already know the kanji. Thanks for the tip.I can't say I've ever heard anyone say that. I always hear お金をおろす。
Yeah, that was intentional.You probably know that and decided to go for a more casual route, but its worth mentioning that grammatically there should be a を between こと and 止めなさい
So then a positive ~ば conditional shouldn't be used with いけない?やめてはいけない or やめてはダメ instead of やめればいけない. Try not to forget the [です] or [だ] after な形容詞 and 名詞 , even though in casual speech they're sometimes omitted
I'm pretty sure 思う isn't the sort of thought I was trying to get across.
I think you mean 引き落とす not 引き出す
お引き出し (withdraw) is commonly seen on ATMs. I think this is where Kraise would have seen it.
お引き出し (withdraw) is commonly seen on ATMs. I think this is where Kraise would have seen it.
Ah, I didn't know that. Thanks!Also note that よく has the meaning of "often" when modifying verbs, not adjectives.
勉強が大切よ。辞めればいけない!
妹は転んだけど、私はぜんぜん知らなかったです。
This is one of the hardest things to grasp, but it should be 勉強は and 妹が, as Kraise-san revised.(私は ) 妹が転んだことを (全く) 全然知らなかった
Just for confirmation, do you understand the difference between the two conditionals ~ては and ~ば?So then a positive ~ば conditional shouldn't be used with いけない?
There is no implied topic there. That's just a general statement. Related to はが issue I mentioned above, おいしい食べ物は辛い is more appropriate as a statement, though.What I was trying to get across was that I was interpreting 「おいしい食べ物が辛い」 as having 私 as the topic implicitly, since none was stated. From that, I was concluding that this means that おいしい is the speaker's perspective / opinion implicitly. Looking at it now though, I see that can't be the case. I think it actually means "delicious food is spicy". But was I right about the topic and the logic of what that means, at least assuming no context?
No, not at all. I didn't learn conditionals properly, it was one of those ad-hoc things I tried to pick up from inference and examples years ago. I'm just going to drop that for now and come back to it when I get to it in a textbook (except ~なければいけない for "must", which I think is correct, right?).Just for confirmation, do you understand the difference between the two conditionals ~ては and ~ば?
Yes, it's definitely one of the hardest things to grasp.This is one of the hardest things to grasp, but it should be 勉強は and 妹が, as Kraise-san revised.
OK, thanks for clarifying.There is no implied topic there. That's just a general statement.
I have a Taiwanese friend who passed N1 over 10 years ago, received a masters degree in Japanese Literature from Tokyo University, and has worked in a Japanese company for several years...and she still mixes up は and が sometimes (according to Japanese friends). It's a tricky one!Yes, it's definitely one of the hardest things to grasp.
Is there a pattern to it that I'll learn about later on?
Not quite, because all of them end in だ (おいしい is an い-adj).Are any of the following correctly formed statements? If so, what is their meaning?
私は辛い食べ物がおいしいだ。
私には辛い食べ物がおいしいだ。
私には辛い食べ物はおいしいだ。
I get that part. What I have trouble with is understanding when something should be the topic and when it should be the subject. My understanding is that the topic is sort of the main thing being talked about, but that's a bit wishy-washy of an explanation.The subject is marked by が, while the "topic" is marked by は. I'm sure lots of people say the same thing. There plenty of times where it sounds weird to mix them up, if you consider it his way.
Oh! I didn't know that was incorrect. I just learned だ in Japanese class as a casual version of です.Not quite, because all of them end in だ (おいしい is an い-adj).
Yes, as same as なければならない, なくてはいけない or なくてはならない.except ~なければいけない for "must", which I think is correct, right?
私には works fine, but, as already mentioned, と思う can give the meaning that it's the speaker's opinion, for instance, 辛い食べ物はおいしいと思う.Are any of the following correctly formed statements? If so, what is their meaning?
私は辛い食べ物がおいしいだ。
私には辛い食べ物がおいしいだ。
私には辛い食べ物はおいしいだ。
What I have trouble with is understanding when something should be the topic and when it should be the subject.
Wallet is 財布, and かさ is umbrella or parasol.かさは古い[けど/でも]、お金が新しい。 My wallet is old, but it has new money in it.
This would be more confusing, but the most appropriate way to say "This library is huge" is この図書館、広いですね。 without using either は or が because は and が both unnecessarily emphasize "this library". It's similar to a compliment その服かわいいね "your clothes are cute." You can't use any particles after その服 since その服は/がかわいいね has a nuance of "You are not cute", "Your shoes are not cute", "Other clothes are not cute" or like that.このとしょかんは広いね!
This library is huge!
Doh, here I am mixing up my vocabulary. Both さいふ and かさ happen to be new words I'm learning.Wallet is 財布, and かさ is umbrella or parasol.
That's completely turned over everything I thought I knew about Japanese grammar. I never heard of this; I knew that particles weren't used all the time, but I always assumed that the only reason they wouldn't be used was because of them being dropped in colloquial speech.without using either は or が because は and が both unnecessarily emphasize "this library". It's similar to a compliment その服かわいいね "your clothes are cute." You can't use any particles after その服 since その服は/がかわいいね has a nuance of "You are not cute", "Your shoes are not cute", "Other clothes are not cute" or like that.
At the end of my third year of college Japanese, the instructor let us on an advanced secret saying something to the effect of "remember all of that stuff about particles you learned? Well actually you can drop them completely in many cases."That's completely turned over everything I thought I knew about Japanese grammar. I never heard of this; I knew that particles weren't used all the time, but I always assumed that the only reason they wouldn't be used was because of them being dropped in colloquial speech.
I'm also curious, grammatically speaking, what part of the sentence is その服 in 「その服かわいい」