Yeah, that も literally means "too/also" connoting "as same as in other countries" in the example sentence.1. 最近、わたしたちの国でも日本研究が盛んになってきま した。
Translation given (in a dictionary): "Recently the study of Japan has become popular in our country."
I figured that で meant "in (our country)", and も meant mean "too", so I translated it as "Recently the study of Japan has become popular in our country too." However, the dictionary seems to have left も untranslated. I've noticed this before, too, with も. Does も often have a fairly weak meaning in Japanese? Maybe here a sense of weak emphasis?
2. 今晩徹夜で書いちゃおうと思ってるんだ。
I believe this essentially means "I think I'll stay up all night and write (the report)", but I'm not sure about 書いちゃおう. Could it be a contraction of 書いてしまおう perhaps?
Right. やる means 上映する or "to show" in this case.3. Two people are discussing going to see a film.
「七人の侍」なんてめったにやらないんだから、来た時 に見なきゃ。
a) I'm not sure how to interpret やる. Does the first part mean "(They) rarely show films like 「七人の侍」"?
Yes.b) I'm also not sure about 来た時に見なきゃ. Does it mean "... (so) this time (we) must see (the film)"?
Yeah, that's the same to this sentence. The whole clause 落ち着いて本が読める is nagated.4. 隣に座った美人が気になって、落ち着いて本が読めませ んでした。
Translation given: "I was so conscious of the beautiful woman sitting next to me that I couldn't concentrate on my book".
Since 落ち着く means something like "settle down", does the part after the comma mean "... settling down, (I) couldn't read (my) book"? The doubt I have is that the context suggests he couldn't settle down. Does the negative of 読めません somehow distribute to 落ち着いて too?
機嫌よく: in a good mood5. 上田さんは、わたしにきげんよく会ってくれました。
Translation given: "[Mrs] Ueda met me in a good mood."
How does よく work in this sentence? What does it modify?
Thanks Toritoribe. So, would you say the dictionary translation is actually wrong (or at least inadequate) for failing to incorporate the meaning of も?Yeah, that も literally means "too/also" connoting "as same as in other countries" in the example sentence.
Can we put よく directly after any noun with similar effect, or is this a special idiom?機嫌よく: in a good mood
Thanks Toritoribe. So, would you say the dictionary translation is actually wrong (or at least inadequate) for failing to incorporate the meaning of も?
You mean leaving out the が in a noun phrase of condition or mood that normally takes がよく ?Can we put よく directly after any noun with similar effect, or is this a special idiom?
As an example making a weakly causal "te" verb or adjective form that was logically consistent with not being able to read the book ? (I was in a bad mood/I was dancing for joy and couldn't read...etc).Oh, and one other question if I may. Going back to 落ち着いて本が読めませんでした, let's say we wanted the same structure of "verb-て + 本が読めませんでした", but we didn't want the negative sense to apply to the first verb. Could we do that somehow?
It's only the grammar I'm interested in, so if it doesn't work in Japanese with 落ち着く then please choose any other verb that makes sense.
I'm not sure. Any general information about the grammar that allows an adverb to be placed directly after a noun to modify that noun, as in "機嫌よく = in a good mood", would be useful. I don't think I have learned this grammar and I don't understand whether it is generally applicable, or works only with よく, or works only in certain special idioms.You mean leaving out the が in a noun phrase of condition or mood that normally takes がよく ?
Yes, anything like that. For example, with a certain suitable verb, can we say "verb-て本が読めませ んでした" to mean "I did verb and/but couldn't read my book", or does that pattern always propagate the negative sense to "verb", so we have to find another way of saying it?As an example making a weakly causal "te" verb or adjective form that was logically consistent with not being able to read the book ? (I was in a bad mood/I was dancing for joy and couldn't read...etc).
Hmm... I can't find the way with same structure.Oh, and one other question if I may. Going back to 落ち着いて本が読めませんでした, let's say we wanted the same structure of "verb-て + 本が読めませんでした", but we didn't want the negative sense to apply to the first verb. Could we do that somehow?
It can be said that the speaker intends to say, consciously or subconsciously, "as same as in other countries".So, would you say the dictionary translation is actually wrong (or at least inadequate) for failing to incorporate the meaning of も?
Not all nouns that have the structure "nounがいい/悪い" can be used as "nounよく", but some of them can do as follows.Can we put よく directly after any noun with similar effect, or is this a special idiom?
e.g.Going back to 落ち着いて本が読めませんでした, let's say we wanted the same structure of "verb-て + 本が読めませんでした", but we didn't want the negative sense to apply to the first verb. Could we do that somehow?
It's only the grammar I'm interested in, so if it doesn't work in Japanese with 落ち着く then please choose any other verb that makes sense.
"If (you) make a reservation but don't go, the seat will be empty/the organizer must keep the seat empty."Thanks Toritoribe. Can I please check the translation of
予約をして行かないと、空席ができてしまいます。
Does this mean something like "If (you) make a reservation but don't go, a vacant seat will become available"?
Yeah, I thought of that, too. But 礼儀正しい/規則正しい acts like a single word from the first place, i.e., 礼儀が正しい/規則が正しい is not common, is it?Late to the party here (StarCraft II's fault), but just wanted to say that you can also use at least 正しく the same way as the above よく (礼儀正しく, 規則正しく, and probably others).