テレビを見て下さい/ご覧ください is an invitation or "feel free to~".
No. The one the speaker is talking to doesn't ask permission previously, and it's not the speaker's request, either. It's like "if you like" or "if you don't mind".Is that a request or a grant of permission?
Not the first clause is a request or an invitation, but the whole sentence is a request or an invitation as a set.On one hand you said that is a request, then you said it is an invitation.
You seem to say the first part is definitely a request. How they all fit together then?
Sorry for nitpicking, but I have to say that this terminology is important. Not the same sentence, but the same clause. And yes, the meaning of the clause changes depending on the context, including the preceding clause.Are you saying it all depends on the context because the same sentence could have either intention?
No. "お + -masu stem of verb + ください" / "ご + Chinese origin verbal noun + ください" also works well.By the way, shouldn't ご覧ください be ご覧になってください if it is an honorific form?
So I understand now that the same clause can mean both and all depends on whether a request has been made before then.No. The one the speaker is talking to doesn't ask permission previously,
I like to be meticulous and that's how I learn the right thing. Thanks for your kind attention and your patience with me.Sorry for nitpicking,
Thanks! This is something new to me. I have learnt お + stem of verb + になる to drive honorific verbs.No. "お + -masu stem of verb + ください" / "ご + Chinese origin verbal noun + ください" also works well.
Exactly.So I understand now that the same clause can mean both and all depends on whether a request has been made before then.
Verbal nouns (動詞性名詞/動作性名詞) usually refer to the stem of -suru verbs. The -masu stem of verbs (読み, 負け, 泳ぎ, etc.) belongs to this group in a broader sense, but they are not Chinese origin, anyway.I've thought verbal nouns refer to する verbs only. So do all nouns derived from the stems of the verbs are also called verbal nouns?
You can think they are mostly on'yomi kanji compound words.It's hard to tell if they are of Chinese origin. Could we say those of Chinese origin consists of all kanji?
お勉強 is an exception. ご is usually used with on'yomi kanji words, but some words are used with お (e.g. お食事, お電話, お世話), and some can be attached to both お and ご (e.g. お/ご返事, お/ご誕生, お/ご病気).ThenI've found お勉強.
お勉強ください might be acceptable, but ご勉強ください sounds more natural to me. I would use another expressions (お学びください, ご学習ください, ご研究ください, etc.) for that meaning, though.I'm not sure if I can say お勉強ください.
That's from a classical verb ご覧ず (This is an honorific verb, so ご is attached from the first.)By the way I can't work out how ご覧 is derived. Is 覧 a verbal noun? According to a textbook, the honorific form of 見る is 覧になる. I've supposed these special honorific forms are used in preference to standard common forms.
I have had a check and found the pronunciation of all the kanji's listed have an 音読み reading, except 生 in 誕生 which I'm not sure if じょう is 音読み or 訓読み. What I'm trying to say is that one can't really be sure of using ご for Chinese-originated words and お for those not. There seems to be many exceptions. Again they need to be remembered together I guess.お勉強 is an exception. ご is usually used with on'yomi kanji words, but some words are used with お (e.g. お食事, お電話, お世話), and some can be attached to both お and ご (e.g. お/ご返事, お/ご誕生, お/ご病気).
I see. ご覧ください is from the stem of the masu form of the obsolete verb ご覧ずThat's from a classical verb ご覧ず
Yes, because I only listed on'yomi stem examples.I have had a check and found the pronunciation of all the kanji's listed have an 音読み reading
You can find しょう as an on'yomi, right? じょう is rendaku of it.except 生 in 誕生 which I'm not sure if じょう is 音読み or 訓読み.
You can think on-on combination is the most common for the stem of -suru verbs. Exceptions are very few, e.g., 仕事する, 試合する, 仕置きする, 仕訳する. These し are originally from the -masu stem of する, and 仕 or 試 are just ateji, so they are actually not Chinese origin, and have nothing to do with on'yomi.What I'm trying to say is that one can't really be sure of using ご for Chinese-originated words and お for those not.
Exceptions are not so many. You can think almost all on'yomi stems are used with ご.There seems to be many exceptions.
Not a strong order, but a gentle/tender suggestion, for instance.What is soft imperative?
Special ones are not so many. What I can think of now is おいで (including ~ておいで), but "お + -masu stem of verb" has a similar nuance (e.g. お食べ, お行き, お入り). (おいで is also from "お + the -masu stem of a classical verb 出づ".)Are there a lot of soft imperative verbs?
Are you saying お電話してください can be used to ask a favour of calling someone else but not oneself? So are 食事 and stems of other する verbs?Incidentally, although 食事 is the stem of -suru verbs, お食事ください means "please give me a meal", not "please eat". Similarly, お電話ください is used only for "please call me", and can't mean "please call someone else", unlike お電話してください. 食事 and 電話 are not interpreted as a verbal noun in these cases, and ください works as a verb "give me ~", not "give a favor of doing for me". You can think お電話ください is a kind of set expression.
Special verbs exclude する verbs, aren't they?Special ones are not so many.
Yes, that's a request because of 宿題が終わってから. 退屈だったら(if you are boring)テレビを見て下さい/ご覧ください is an invitation or "feel free to~".
Yes.Are you saying お電話してください can be used to ask a favour of calling someone else but not oneself?
"The stem of -suru verbs + して" is "the -te form of the -suru verb", after all. Thus, お電話してください or お食事してください are a polite version of "-te form of verb + ください", e.g. 食べてください, 見てください, 教えてください, etc.So are 食事 and stems of other する verbs?
Sorry but I don't get what you mean.Special verbs exclude する verbs, aren't they?
Ooops! My bad!! Yes, I meant "if you are bored". Thanks for your correction.shouldn't it be "if you are bored"?
ご is usually used with on'yomi kanji words, but some words are used with お (e.g. お食事, お電話, お世話)
I did see it and I guessed I knew what Toritoribe san meant so I didn't ask further. Language is a living thing even dictionaries are not up to the minute. So it is hard to tell. Someone might take it literally. Anyway it is good to be meticulous in order to be sure.shouldn't it be "if you are bored"?
I just want to be sure that する verbs cannot be soft imperative verbs.Sorry but I don't get what you mean.
It seems that this is a very good way to differentiate when お instead of ご should go with the kanji.it is helpful (and etymologically accurate) to think of 世話 as ateji,
I see. "The stem of -suru verb + おし" can work as a soft imperative as same as "お + -masu stem of verb". (し is the -masu stem of する.)I just want to be sure that する verbs cannot be soft imperative verbs.