Han Chan
先輩
- 14 Mar 2006
- 444
- 16
I find the claim of Hiragana Times that "Japanese are a Clone-like Race" is very problematic. Earlier this year Hiragana Times had an article: "Japanese are a Clone-like Race", which tries to help forigners understan the "strange" japanese. I assumed that the article had been written by a forigner who enjoyed repeating stereotypes, but I now realize that it was actually a Japanese man who wrote this.
It find "Clone-like Race" a dedrading term which gives associations to "robot". Further it denies the obvious very great variation in personalities, points of view and lifestyles which are so appearent for anyone who know japanese.
Do you think that it is fair to describe Japanese as a Clone-like Race?
It find "Clone-like Race" a dedrading term which gives associations to "robot". Further it denies the obvious very great variation in personalities, points of view and lifestyles which are so appearent for anyone who know japanese.
Do you think that it is fair to describe Japanese as a Clone-like Race?