On 9-11 3 steel framed buildings collapsed due to fire. If the building was hit hard by debris it still does not collapse. Have you seen buildings from war torn countries? Have you seen pictures from say Beirut or Sarajevo? The buildings have alot of holes and is shattered but they still don't collapse.
Have you seen pictures of Kobe after the earth quake? How many buildings collapsed like they did on 9-11? 0. Buildings collapsed but not like they did in New York. This could be because of the construction design but I think that possibility sounds even less likely.
And what sort of perimeter CCTV camera (aimed towards the ground, as on US home soil that is the most likely vector for intruders) do you think is going to accurately reveal an image of an object travelling at about 300mph?
Yes. We see clear pictures of rockets being shot so how hard can it be to show a clear picture of a commercial airliner? In one of the most heavily secured buildings on this earth.
I think most people consider it extremely cowardly to attack civilians who by definition are not equipped to effectively fight back.
Your posts are made of lose, my friend. Derfel for the win.
Suicide bombings is not regarded as suicides but martyr operation. Scarificing your life in battle is not seen as coward. I think they have more guts than American soldiers hiding behind millitary tanks shooting at bomb shelters though. I don't agree with any of them but if I have to chose what I think is the most coward. It surely is not the peopole who are willing to sacrifice their lives for a cause. Any attack on civilian is wrong. I personally think punching people is wrong too.
It also is coward to impose sanctions on a country and starving close up to a million people like what US did to Iraq prior to the war leading to 9-11.
How about because no three steel framed buildings have ever been in a similar situation, two hit by aircraft and one hit by a huge cloud of concrete debris?
Also judging this entirely on pictures is highly dubious, these things require study and understanding of materials, designs, blueprints- not only of the buildings but the collision objects also.
If you look at that picture how come the buildings around WTC 1,2 did not collapse but only WTC7? WHo cares who said what. With your own eyes. Take a look at the picture and see for yourself.
The whole point is jet fuel fire does not get hot enought to melt steel! The law of science says that this is impossible. If the water temperature is 60 degrees the water does not start to boil. This is another law of science.
They say it doesn't have to melt but only make it softer. And that is enough to make the building collapse. However I argue that it didn't get hot enought to even make steel softer.
This is good.
Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation
While I am not an engineer so I am not a specialist in this field. Just the fact that a number of engineers are critical to the US version makes it strange.
Google jet fuel fire. And you end up with alot of web results.
If it wasn't a set up you would have thought that they would atleast not clean the mess and ship the steel away ASAP like the US government did. Do you remeber how quick they were to point at someone? Then one of Bush's quotes was that there is no room for conspiracy?
These same people wrote a few years earlier through PNAC that a Pearl Harbour style attack is needed to boost millitary spendings. Need a Pearl Harbour? You have to be a nutcase to state in public that US needs a Peral Harbour.
