- 30 Apr 2007
- 1,173
- 84
Real isn't a myth, I think Japan has certain places where Japanese culture as defined by the Japanese is found more abundantly than others. These locations are designated as 'real' because the Japanese feel they correctly (and conveniently) embody what they wish foreigners to experience. From a foreign perspective, everythings great and exciting but its not necessarily real from a Japanese perspective.
Incidentally, I was speaking with a Japanese friend today and moving back to the original topic, she clearly stated that gaijin was a little 'rude' and that she preferred 'gaikokujin'. However, neither of these specificed anything beyond the fact that the person wasn't Japanese. To specifically describe Westerners, 'hakujin' is sometime used. This, she explained, meant white person, however, it was just as rude as 'gaijin'. She preferred to use their country of origin + jin if the country was known.
Incidentally, I was speaking with a Japanese friend today and moving back to the original topic, she clearly stated that gaijin was a little 'rude' and that she preferred 'gaikokujin'. However, neither of these specificed anything beyond the fact that the person wasn't Japanese. To specifically describe Westerners, 'hakujin' is sometime used. This, she explained, meant white person, however, it was just as rude as 'gaijin'. She preferred to use their country of origin + jin if the country was known.